Search

Background: Due to misinformation and enduring discourses about pregnant women and mothers suspected of using drugs, these women continue to experience systemic discrimination. In 2014, this fact was once again made public in Canada when the Ontario government established an independent review of hair testing practices conducted by Motherisk Drug Testing Laboratory (MDTL) at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Kids. Between 2005 and 2015, MDTL tested the hair of more than 16,000 individuals for drug consumption. The results were introduced as evidence in court and resulted in both temporary and permanent loss of custody of children. Tragically, it was later discovered that the hair testing results were unreliable. This paper provides an analysis of child protection policies and practices directed at pregnant women and mothers suspected of using drugs, with a focus on the Motherisk tragedy in Ontario.Methods: Informed by feminist and critical drug perspectives, this study draws from findings in the 2015″Report of the Motherisk Hair Analysis Independent Review," produced by Honourable Susan Lang, and provides a Bacchi-informed critical analysis of Commissioner Beaman's 2018 report of the Motherisk Commission, "Harmful Impacts: The Reliance on Hair Testing in Child Protection" (HI).Results: The HI report is quite sympathetic to the plight of families and it acknowledges systemic issues and unequal power relations between families, social workers and the courts. Even though drug testing is an inadequate measure of parenting capacity, the HI report does not recommend banning the practice. In the HI report, the themes of harm reduction and drug prohibition are notably absent - while the use of gender-neutral terms, such as "parent" and "families," render mothers invisible.Conclusions: The Motherisk tragedy cannot be understood as an isolated event, rather it is part of a continuum of state and gendered violence against poor, Indigenous, and Black women in Canada. The HI report fails to consider how prohibitionist discourses about drugs, addiction, mothering, and risk lead to institutional practices such as drug testing and child apprehension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper explores elements of the relationships that develop between people who use illicit drugs and people who provide services to them. It focuses on expectations people who use drugs and service providers have of health and social care relationships for harm reduction, as well as facilitators and barriers to effective and ineffective interactions, and to what governments might better do to help strengthen interactions. Prior to Canada''s inaugural national harm reduction conference, informal discussion groups were organized to source local views regarding policy reform for harm reduction. One component of these discussion groups focused upon improving health and social care relationships for harm reduction. Community-based organizations providing services for harm minimisation were consulted to help develop themes and questions. Discussion groups conducted in French or English were held in 10 cities across Canada. Groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Disjuncture between understandings of the nature of health and social care relationships for harm reduction were found. Interpersonal and structural factors functioned both for and against the development of effective interactions. Differences in expectation sets held by illicit drug users and service providers may reflect the fluid experience of boundaries as a population on society''s margins moves between harm-causing and harm-reducing behaviours and identities. The research described in this paper targeted those most directly involved in receiving, developing and delivering harm reduction programmes across a very diverse nation. It did so by including representatives of those most directly involved in utilizing and providing services within the research process itself. By incorporating a process that was community-based, user-driven, and which strived to be non-judgmental, the research was able to explore suggestions for improving health and social care relationships for harm reduction proffered by professionals actively providing services, as well as a variety of users, including some isolated or structurally excluded from service access by geography, illiteracy and/or street-involvement. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Research on harm reduction has typically focused on broad-based or organisational strategies such as needle exchange and opiate substitute programmes. Less attention has been paid to the self-directed harm reduction practices of substance users themselves. Few studies have focused on sexual minority populations such as gay and bisexual men and fewer still on the marginalised groups that constitute these populations. This paper identifies self-directed harm reduction strategies among substance using ethno-racially diverse gay and bisexual men. Methods: This article presents findings from the Party Drugs Study in Toronto''s gay dance club scene, a community-based qualitative study in Toronto, Canada. We present a thematic analysis of interviews with 43 gay and bisexual men from diverse ethno-racial backgrounds about their substance use in the gay dance club scene. Findings: We identify five self-directed harm reduction strategies: rationing, controlling or avoiding mixing, controlling quality, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and following guidelines during substance use. Conclusions: We discuss our findings in relation to prior research and to critical theory. We suggest that drug users’ awareness of possible harm, and their personal investment in harm reduction, constitute a viable platform from which community-based and public health organisations may promote and strengthen harm reduction among gay and bisexual men from ethno-racially diverse backgrounds. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]