1. Chronological transition in outcome of second-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer after pembrolizumab approval: a multicenter retrospective analysis
- Author
-
Toshiki Etani, Noriyasu Kawai, Taku Naiki, Takashi Nagai, Ryosuke Ando, Teruki Isobe, Takahiro Yasui, Nami Tomiyama, Nobuhiko Shimizu, Rika Banno, Satoshi Nozaki, Aya Naiki-Ito, Yusuke Noda, Yosuke Sugiyama, Keitaro Iida, Hiroki Kubota, and Shuzo Hamamoto
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Chemotherapy ,Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Hazard ratio ,Hematology ,General Medicine ,Pembrolizumab ,Confidence interval ,Gemcitabine ,Docetaxel ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Surgery ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
After first-line chemotherapy failure, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients undergo pembrolizumab (PEM) or gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) therapy. We retrospectively investigated outcomes of second-line GD or PEM for mUC patients. A total of 198 mUC patients from Nagoya City University and affiliated hospitals who received second-line treatment were grouped according to immune check point inhibitor (ICI) availability: Groups A (pre-ICI: n = 104) and B (post-ICI: n = 94). We compared clinical outcomes using Kaplan–Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses assessed potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Median OS was significantly longer for Group B [median 13.6 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6–17.6] than A (7.6 months, 5.3–8.8). By sub-group analysis, patients received no additional treatment (Naive, n = 70), or PEM or GD (Salvage, n = 24) in Group B, with median OS of Naive and A groups similar. Compared to the Salvage group, significant differences in OS were observed (median 7.6 months, 95% CI 5.3–8.8; Group A, 7.6 months, 4.7–13.8; Naive, 25.7 months, 14.0–31.0; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF