Search

Background: For primary organ preservation, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is performed for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In this organ-preservation setting with CCRT, surgery is reserved as a salvage treatment in cases of locoregional failure after CCRT. The purpose of the study was to review our experience with salvage surgery after CCRT for patients with SCCHN and to evaluate the effectiveness and prognostic factors affecting survival. Methods: The records of patients with stage II-IVB SCC of the larynx, oropharynx, or hypopharynx treated with salvage surgery after CCRT between 1998 and 2012 were reviewed. Results: A total of 645 patients with previously untreated, resectable SCC of the larynx, oropharynx, or hypopharynx received CCRT. Salvage surgery was performed for 78 of 225 patients with residual or recurrent tumors. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival rates for patients who received salvage surgery were 61.0 and 65.5 %, respectively. Stage IV, poorly differentiated, synchronous double cancer, and surgical complications were significant predictors of unfavorable OS on multivariate analysis. Postoperative complications were observed in 30 patients (38.5 %). Conclusions: Salvage surgery is the best therapeutic option for failure after CCRT for SCCHN because of its good survival rate, although a high surgical complication rate is seen. Patients with initial stage IV tumors, poorly differentiated SCC, or synchronous double cancer are considered for further adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used to treat lymph node metastatic head and neck cancer patients. Regional control of the neck disease is important to improve the prognosis, and the accuracy of the method used to evaluate the metastatic lymph node(s) after CRT is crucial to the decision-making process for any following salvage surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing CRT were divided in two groups of patients of those showing complete clinical response (CR) and those showing clinical non-response (non-CR), as assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and fine needle aspiration cytology. The responses (CR vs. non-CR) were compared with the actual clinical outcomes. For the interim analysis, the study period was broken down into two periods, namely, the exploratory phase (patients treated between January 2002 and April 2012) and the validating phase (patients treated between May 2012 and January 2014). Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were as follows: CT and/or MRI, 66.7, 73.8, and 72.8 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase; ultrasonography, 91.7, 70.6, and 73.4 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 80.0, 82.8, and 82.4 %, respectively, in the validating phase; FDG-PET, 50.0, 97.5, and 91.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 60.0, 100, and 94.1 %, respectively, in the validating phase; cytology, 68.4, 95.9, and 90.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 66.7, 100, and 85.7 %, respectively, in the validating phase. Conclusions: Based on our results, CT and/or MRI appear to be inadequate methods for the evaluation of the response of lymph node(s) to CRT. In contrast, ultrasonography appears to be a highly sensitive and useful tool for positive screening at 6-8 weeks after CRT, and FDG-PET appears to be a highly specific and useful tool for negative screening at 8-12 weeks after CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used to treat cervical lymph node(s) metastatic head and neck cancer patients. Evaluation and treatment of lymph node(s) after CRT is important to improve the prognosis. Methods: Prior to CRT, we determined the TNM stage by visual and imaging examinations. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated from the results of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). After CRT, the patients were divided in two groups-complete response (CR) and non-CR-and their responses were compared with the clinical characteristics. Results: T4, N2b, N2c and TLG ≥18.8 were statistically significant predictive indices before CRT. The odds ratio, 95 % confidence interval and p value were, respectively-T4: 2.73, 1.15-6.51, 0.0230; N2b: 6.96, 1.50-32.3, 0.0132; N2c: 11.80, 2.37-58.50, 0.00258; and TLG ≥18.8: 6.25, 2.17-18.00, 0.000672. Conclusions: TLG was found to be a good predictive factor for metastatic lymph node(s) prior to CRT treatment. After CRT treatment, FDG-PET was found to be highly specific and useful for negative screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]