1. Assessment of endothelial shear stress in patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses using coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
- Author
-
Huang D, Muramatsu T, Li Y, Yang W, Nagahara Y, Chu M, Kitslaar P, Sarai M, Ozaki Y, Chatzizisis YS, Yan F, Reiber JHC, Wu R, Pu J, and Tu S
- Subjects
- Aged, Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology, Coronary Stenosis physiopathology, Coronary Vessels physiopathology, Endothelium, Vascular physiopathology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Cardiovascular, Patient-Specific Modeling, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Predictive Value of Tests, Pulsatile Flow, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Mechanical, Computed Tomography Angiography, Coronary Angiography methods, Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging, Coronary Circulation, Coronary Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging, Endothelium, Vascular diagnostic imaging, Hemodynamics, Multidetector Computed Tomography
- Abstract
Characterization of endothelial shear stress (ESS) may allow for prediction of the progression of atherosclerosis. The aim of this investigation was to develop a non-invasive approach for in vivo assessment of ESS by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to compare it with ESS derived from invasive coronary angiography (ICA). A total of 41 patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses who underwent both CTA and ICA were included in the analysis. Two geometrical models of the interrogated vessels were reconstructed separately from CTA and ICA images. Subsequently, computational fluid dynamics were applied to calculate the ESS, from which ESS
CTA and ESSICA were derived, respectively. Comparisons between ESSCTA and ESSICA were performed on 163 segments of 57 vessels in the CTA and ICA models. ESSCTA and ESSICA were similar: mean ESS: 4.97 (4.37-5.57) Pascal versus 4.86 (4.27-5.44) Pascal, p = 0.58; minimal ESS: 0.86 (0.67-1.05) Pascal versus 0.79 (0.63-0.95) Pascal, p = 0.37; and maximal ESS: 14.50 (12.62-16.38) Pascal versus 13.76 (11.44-16.08) Pascal, p = 0.44. Good correlations between the ESSCTA and the ESSICA were observed for the mean (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), minimal (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and maximal (r = 0.62, p < 0.001) ESS values. In conclusion, geometrical reconstruction by CTA yields similar results to ICA in terms of segment-based ESS calculation in patients with low and intermediate stenoses. Thus, it has the potential of allowing combined local hemodynamic and plaque morphologic information for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF