Search

Background In cardiogenic shock (CS) the Impella CP® device provides a fast available left ventricular circulatory support of up to 4.0L/min. However, the use of the Impella CP® device was not systematically analysed yet. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive patients suffering from severe therapy refractory CS treated with Impella CP®. Mortality was estimated using the SAPS II-Score. Primary outcome was 30-day survival. We compared the different aetiologies of CS and the effect of additional extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Results Aetiology of CS was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 15 patients, 9 patients received additional therapy with ECLS. SAPS II was 73±14, representing an estimated mortality of 87.1%. 18 patients deceased representing a 30-day survival of 36%. Comparing the different aetiologies, ACS-CS patients show a trend towards better survival. Additional therapy with ECLS did not change 30-day survival. In 3 cases, vascular complication needing surgical treatment occurred. All other patients showed no relevant complications except for the commonly seen haemolysis with consecutive need of transfusion. Conclusion Our data could demonstrate that the Impella CP ® application in these severely diseased patients is feasible and safe. Compared to the estimated mortality, the 30-day survival seems to be improved.

Background Autologous progenitor cell therapy comprising granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of bone-marrow derived progenitor cells (BMPCs) into peripheral blood and inhibition of dipeptidylpeptidase-IV by sitagliptin for enhanced myocardial recruitment of circulating BMPCs has been shown to improve survival after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in preclinical studies. In the SITAGRAMI trial we found that during short-term follow-up G-CSF plus sitagliptin (GS) failed to show a beneficial effect on cardiac function and clinical events in patients with acute MI that underwent successful PCI. The objective of the present analysis was to assess the impact of GS versus placebo treatment on long-term clinical outcomes of the SITAGRAMI trial patient population. Methods In the randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled SITAGRAMI trial, 174 patients with acute MI were assigned to GS or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome for the present long-term analysis was the composite of death, MI or stroke on long-term follow-up. Results The median [IQR] follow-up duration was 4.50 [3.56–5.95] years. The primary outcome occurred in 12.8% of patients assigned to placebo and 9.2% assigned to GS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.28–1.69; p=0.42). The incidence of the combined cardiovascular outcome was 47.7% in the placebo- and 41.4% in the GS-group (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48–1.18; p=0.21). Overall, there was no significant difference in MACCE rates between both treatment groups (p=0.41). Conclusion These long-term follow-up data indicate that GS therapy does not improve clinical outcomes of patients with acute MI.

Background Endothelial injuries regularly occur in atherosclerosis and during interventional therapies of the arterial occlusive disease. Disturbances in the endothelial integrity can lead to insufficient blood supply and bear the risk of thrombus formation and acute vascular occlusion. At present, effective therapeutics to restore endothelial integrity are barely available. We analyzed the effect of pharmacological DPP-4-inhibition by Sitagliptin on endogenous progenitor cell-based endothelial regeneration via the SDF-1α/CXCR4-axis after acute endothelial damage in a mouse model of carotid injury. Methods and Results Induction of a defined endothelial injury was performed in the carotid artery of C57Bl/6 mice which led to a local upregulation of SDF-1α expression. Animals were treated with placebo, Sitagliptin or Sitagliptin+AMD3100. Using mass spectrometry we could prove that Sitagliptin prevented cleavage of the chemokine SDF-1α. Accordingly, increased SDF-1α concentrations enhanced recruitment of systemically applied and endogenous circulating CXCR4+ progenitor cells to the site of vascular injury followed by a significantly accelerated reendothelialization as compared to placebo-treated animals. Improved endothelial recovery, as well as recruitment of circulating CXCR4+ progenitor cells (CD133+, Flk1+), was reversed by CXCR4-antagonization through AMD3100. In addition, short-term Sitagliptin treatment did not significantly promote neointimal or medial hyperplasia. Conclusion Sitagliptin can accelerate endothelial regeneration after acute endothelial injury. DPP-4 inhibitors prevent degradation of the chemokine SDF-1α and thus improve the recruitment of regenerative circulating CXCR4+ progenitor cells which mediate local endothelial cell proliferation without adversely affecting vessel wall architecture.

Objective In animal models, G-CSF based progenitor cell mobilization combined with a DPP4 inhibitor leads to increased homing of bone marrow derived progenitor cells to the injured myocardium via the SDF1/CXCR4 axis resulting in improved ejection fraction and survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Research design and methods After successful revascularization in AMI, 174 patients were randomized 1:1 in a multi-centre, prospective, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double blind, phase III efficacy and safety trial to treatment with G-CSF and Sitagliptin (GS) or placebo. Diabetic and non-diabetic patients were included in our trial. The primary efficacy endpoint hierarchically combined global left and right ventricular ejection fraction changes from baseline to 6months of follow-up (Δ LVEF , Δ RVEF ), as determined by cardiac MRI. Results At follow-up Δ LVEF as well as Δ RVEF did not differ between the GS and placebo group. Patients in the placebo group had a similar risk for a major adverse cardiac event within 12months of follow-up as compared to patients under GS. Conclusion Progenitor cell therapy comprising the use of G-CSF and Sitagliptin after successfully revascularized acute myocardial infarction fails to show a beneficial effect on cardiac function and clinical events after 12months. (EudraCT: 2007–003,941-34; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00650143, funding: Heinz-Nixdorf foundation).