Search

Electrocardiographic criteria of preexcitation syndrome are sometimes not visible on ECG in sinus rhythm (SR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the significance of unapparent preexcitation syndrome in SR, when overt conduction through accessory pathway (AP) was noted at atrial pacing. Methods Anterograde conduction through atrioventricular AP was identified at electrophysiological study (EPS) in 712 patients, studied for tachycardia (n=316), syncope (n=89) or life-threatening arrhythmia (n=55) or asymptomatic preexcitation syndrome (n=252). ECG in SR at the time of EPS was analysed. Results 78 patients (11%) (group I) had a normal ECG in SR and anterograde conduction over AP at atrial pacing; 634 (group II) had overt preexcitation in SR. Group I was as frequently asymptomatic (35%) as group II (35%), had as frequently tachycardias, syncope or life-threatening arrhythmia as group II (43, 5, 2% vs 43, 13, 8%). AP was more frequently left lateral in group I (57%) than in group II (36%)(p Conclusions The frequency of unapparent preexcitation syndrome represents 11% of our population with anterograde conduction through an AP and could be underestimated. The risk to have a malignant form is as high as in patients with overt preexcitation syndrome in SR.

Electrocardiographic criteria of preexcitation syndrome are sometimes not visible on ECG in sinus rhythm (SR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the significance of unapparent preexcitation syndrome in SR, when overt conduction through accessory pathway (AP) was noted at atrial pacing.Anterograde conduction through atrioventricular AP was identified at electrophysiological study (EPS) in 712 patients, studied for tachycardia (n=316), syncope (n=89) or life-threatening arrhythmia (n=55) or asymptomatic preexcitation syndrome (n=252). ECG in SR at the time of EPS was analysed.78 patients (11%) (group I) had a normal ECG in SR and anterograde conduction over AP at atrial pacing; 634 (group II) had overt preexcitation in SR. Group I was as frequently asymptomatic (35%) as group II (35%), had as frequently tachycardias, syncope or life-threatening arrhythmia as group II (43, 5, 2% vs 43, 13, 8%). AP was more frequently left lateral in group I (57%) than in group II (36%)(p0.001). AV re-entrant tachycardia, atrial fibrillation (AF), antidromic tachycardia were induced as frequently in group I (54, 18, 10%) as in group II (54, 27, 7%). Malignant forms (induced AF with RR intervals between preexcited beats250ms in control state or200ms after isoproterenol) were as frequent in group I (11.5%) as II (14%).The frequency of unapparent preexcitation syndrome represents 11% of our population with anterograde conduction through an AP and could be underestimated. The risk to have a malignant form is as high as in patients with overt preexcitation syndrome in SR.