Search

We tested the hypothesis that initiation versus non-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a more favorable subsequent change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a real-world setting.A prospective, non-randomized, double-arm, open-label, cohort study had been conducted across 687 centers in 17 European countries enrolling HFrEF patients aged ≥18 years with symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II-IV) and "reduced LVEF". For the current analysis, 2602 patients with LVEF measured at baseline and follow-up were chosen, of which 860 (33%, mean age 67 years, 26% women) were started on sacubitril/valsartan at baseline and 1742 (67%, 68 years, 23% women) were not. Patients started on sacubitril/valsartan had higher NYHA class and lower LVEF.LVEF increased from mean 32.7% to 38.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus from 35.9% to 38.7% in the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (mean difference in increase 2.6%, p 0.001). LVEF increased from baseline in 64% versus 53% of patients and increased by ≥5% (absolute %) in 50% versus 35% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan versus non-sacubitril/valsartan groups, respectively. In the overall cohort, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with any increase in LVEF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [1.26-1.75]) and with increase by ≥5% (OR 1.65 [1.39-1.95]).Initiating versus not initiating sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with a greater subsequent increase in LVEF in this real-world setting. Reverse cardiac remodeling may be one mechanism of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan.

Background Accurate non-invasive estimation of right atrial pressure (RAP) is essential to assess volume status and optimize therapy in heart failure (HF). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of right atrial reservoir strain (RASr) assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography to identify elevated RAP in HF and compare diagnostic performance with estimated RAP employing inferior vena cava size and collapsibility (RAPIVC), in addition to RA area. Method Association between RASr and invasive RAP (RAPInvasive) was examined in 103 HF subjects that underwent standard echocardiography with speckle-tracking strain analysis directly followed by right heart catheterization. The discriminatory ability of RASr to identify RAPInvasive > 7 mmHg was evaluated and compared with RAPIVC and RA area. Results RASr demonstrated association with RAPInvasive (β = −0.41, p 7 mmHg (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI 0.68–0.87; p Conclusions RASr demonstrates good ability to identify elevated RAP and relatively stronger diagnostic performance when compared with conventional non-invasive measures. RASr may be useful as a novel noninvasive estimate of RAP in HF management.

The distinction between pre-capillary and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is central to accurate diagnosis and appropriate therapy. We aimed to investigate the ability of the novel echocardiographic pulmonary to left atrial global strain ratio (ePLAGS) to distinguish pre-capillary from post-capillary PH and compare its discriminatory strength with the echocardiographic pulmonary to left atrial ratio (ePLAR).Consecutive subjects with unexplained dyspnea or heart failure underwent echocardiography immediately followed by right heart catheterization. Subjects who did not satisfy the ESC/ERS criteria for PH, in atrial fibrillation or under pacemaker therapy, or with significant concomitant valvular disease were excluded. ePLAGS was calculated as peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity divided by left atrial global reservoir strain.One hundred and thirty PH subjects, as defined by right heart catheterization, were included in the analysis (pre-capillary: n = 64, post-capillary: n = 66). ePLAGS was lower in pre-capillary compared with post-capillary PH (0.19 ± 0.14 vs. 0.45 ± 0.58 m/s/%; p = 0.02) and significantly different between combined post- and pre-capillary PH (Cpc-PH) and isolated post-capillary PH (Ipc-PH) (0.62 ± 0.85 vs. 0.32 ± 0.19 m/s/%; p = 0.04). ePLAR was higher in pre-capillary as compared with post-capillary PH (0.37 ± 0.16 vs. 0.20 ± 0.08; p 0.001) but did not differ between Ipc-PH and Cpc-PH. ePLAGS demonstrated stronger discriminating power than ePLAR to distinguish pre-capillary from post-capillary PH (AUC = 0.80 vs. 0.70). In the setting of post capillary PH, ePLAGS showed reasonable ability to distinguish Ipc-PH from Cpc-PH (AUC = 0.65). ePLAR, however, did not differentiate these two groups (AUC = 0.49; p 0.05).ePLAGS accurately differentiates pre-capillary from post-capillary PH and demonstrates higher diagnostic ability than ePLAR.

International audience; Background - Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with poor quality of life (QoL), or patient reported outcome (PRO). Despite female predominance in HFpEF, sex-specific differences in PROs remain poorly studied. We assessed PRO measures and their association with HF-severity and outcome in HFpEF by sex. Methods and results - In 378 patients with HFpEF from the KaRen study, EQ-5D-3L® and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire® (MLHFQ) were assessed. Characteristics and comorbidities were largely similar in women (n = 212, 57%) and men. Women expressed worse QoL in EQ-5D-3L®(EQ-VAS), independent of age and HF-severity, mean (SD), 57 (20) vs. 61 (19), p = 0.010. There was no difference in MLHFQ, 31 (21) vs. 29 (21), p = 0.269. Spearman's correlations with HF-severity (NYHA-class) were for MLHFQ in women r 0.37 vs. men 0.41, p for both

International audience; BACKGROUND: In acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) there are no surrogate endpoints for early phase trials. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether a reduction in natriuretic peptides (NP) between acute hospital presentation to stable follow-up is associated with improved mortality and morbidity. METHODS: Patients presenting acutely to the hospital for ADHF with HFpEF enrolled in the Karolinska Rennes (KaRen) study and reporting N-terminal pro-B-type NP or B-type NP assessment at baseline hospital presentation and at 4-8weeks follow-up were prospectively studied. Logistic regression analyses were performed to detect the predictors of baseline and changes in NPs. Cox regression models were performed to assess the impact of NP reductions on mortality and the composite of mortality and HF hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 361 patients (median follow-up 585days), 267 (74%) reported an improvement in NPs, while 94 (26%) reported worsening. At baseline, the independent predictors of lower NPs were higher glomerular filtration rate (Odds Ratio [OR] per unit: 1.013; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.005-1.021) and younger age (OR per year: 0.972; CI: 0.947-0.998). Improvement in NPs at follow-up was predicted by higher heart rate at baseline (OR per bpm: 1.014; CI: 1.003-1.025). After adjustments, the hazard ratio for all-cause death was 0.730 (CI: 0.456-1.169) and for the composite outcome 0.814 (CI: 0.582-1.139) for patients who improved vs. worsened in NP levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting acutely to the hospital with HFPEF, an improvement in NP levels did not independently and significantly predict improved mortality and/or morbidity. NPs as surrogate endpoints in acute HFpEF require further study.

Background The role of anemia in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF, EF 40–49% and HFpEF, EF ≥50%) is unknown. We aimed to compare prevalence of, associations with, and prognostic role of anemia in HF across the EF spectrum. Methods In patients from the Swedish HF Registry, we assessed the associations between clinical characteristics and anemia (hemoglobin Results Of 49,985 patients with HF (anemia = 34%), 23% had HFpEF (anemia = 41%), 21% had HFmrEF (anemia = 35%) and 55% had HFpEF (anemia = 32%). Higher EF was independently associated with higher likelihood of concomitant anemia. Important predictors of anemia across the EF spectrum were male sex, older age, worse New York Heart Association class and renal function, lower systolic blood pressure, higher N-Terminal B-type natriuretic peptides levels, diabetes, valvular disease and in-patient status. Anemia had adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for mortality or HF hospitalization 1.24 (1.18–1.30) in HFpEF, 1.26 (1.19–1.34) in HFmrEF and 1.14 (1.10–1.19) in HFrEF; pinteractionEF = 0.003; and for mortality 1.28 (1.20–1.36) in HFpEF, 1.21 (1.13–1.29) in HFmrEF, and 1.30 (1.24–1.35) in HFrEF; pinteractionEF = 0.22. Conclusions In this nation-wide registry, prevalence of anemia was higher in HFpEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFrEF, but was associated with a similarly increased risk of death across the EF spectrum, with greater risk of death or HF hospitalization in HFpEF and HFmrEF vs. HFrEF.

The aim was to assess sex-specific differences in N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) regarding concentrations, predictors of high concentrations, and prognostic role, in a large and unselected population with chronic heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).In 9847 outpatients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF (49 vs. 35 vs. 25% females, respectively) from the Swedish HF Registry, median NT-proBNP concentrations were 1598 ng/L in females vs. 1310 ng/L in males in HFpEF, 1764 vs. 1464 ng/L in HFmrEF, and 2543 vs. 2226 ng/L in HFrEF (p 0.05 for all). The differences persisted after multiple adjustment. The largest sex-difference in NT-proBNP levels was observed in HFpEF with sinus rhythm, where median concentrations were 1.4 folds higher in females (923 vs. 647 ng/L). Independent predictors of NT-proBNP levels (defined as above the different medians according to sex and HF phenotype) were overall consistent across sexes and EF. NT-proBNP levels were similarly associated with risk of all-cause death/HF hospitalization in both sexes regardless of EF.Concentrations of NT-proBNP were higher in females across the EF spectrum, with larger relative differences in HFpEF with sinus rhythm. However, similar predictors of high levels were observed in both sexes. There were no sex-differences in the prognostic role of NT-proBNP. These findings support the use of NT-proBNP for prognostic purposes in chronic HF, regardless of sex.

Heart failure (HF) in developing countries is poorly described. We compare characteristics and prognosis of HF in Tanzania vs. Sweden.A prospective cohort study was conducted from the Tanzania HF study (TaHeF) and the Swedish HF Registry (SwedeHF). Patients were compared overall (n 427 vs. 51,060) and after matching 1:3 by gender and age±5years (n 411 vs. 1232). The association between cohort and all-cause mortality was assessed with multivariable Cox regression.In the unmatched cohorts, TaHeF (as compared to SwedeHF) patients were younger (median age [interquartile range] 55 [40-68] vs. 77 [64-84] years, p0.001) and more commonly women (51% vs. 40%, p0.001). The three-year survival was 61% in both cohorts. In the matched cohorts, TaHeF patients had more hypertension (47% vs. 37%, p0.001), more anemia (57% vs. 9%), more preserved EF, more advanced HF, longer duration of HF, and less use of beta-blockers. Crude mortality was worse in TaHeF (HR 2.25 [95% CI 1.78-2.85], p0.001), with three-year survival 61% vs. 83%. However, covariate-adjusted risk was similar (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.66; p=0.760). In both cohorts, preserved EF was associated with higher mortality in crude but not adjusted analysis.Compared to in Sweden, HF patients in Tanzania were younger and more commonly female, and after age and gender matching, had more frequent hypertension and anemia, more severe HF despite higher EF, and worse crude but similar adjusted prognosis.

Levosimendan is used in acute heart failure (HF) and increasingly as planned repetitive infusions in stable chronic HF, but the extent of this practice is unknown. The aim was to assess the use of levosimendan vs. conventional inotropes and the use as planned repetitive vs. acute treatment, in Sweden.We performed a descriptive study with individual patient validation assessing the use of levosimendan and conventional intravenous inotropes, indications for levosimendan, clinical characteristics and survival in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2000 and 2011. For repetitive levosimendan, we assessed potential indications for alternative interventions.Of 53,548 total registrations, there were 655 confirmed with inotrope use (597 levosimendan, 37 conventional, 21 both) from 22 hospitals responding to validation, and 6069 in-patient controls with New York Heart Association III-IV and ejection fraction40%. The indications for levosimendan were acute HF in 384 registrations (306 patients), and planned repetitive in 234 registrations (87 patients). Planned repetitive as a proportion of total levosimendan registrations ranged 0-65% and of total levosimendan patients ranged 0-54% in different hospitals. Of planned repetitive patients without existing cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, transplant and/or assist device, 46-98% were potential candidates for such interventions.In HF in cardiology and internal medicine in Sweden, levosimendan was the overwhelming inotrope of choice, and the use of planned repetitive levosimendan was extensive, highly variable between hospitals and may have pre-empted other interventions. Potential effects of and indications for planned repetitive levosimendan need to be evaluated in prospective studies.

Introduction: Numerous cohort analyses suggest rapidly increasing use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HTx), but the role of age in selection for MCS remains unknown. Methods: We assessed adult HTx in the International Society for Heart And Lung Transplantation Registry between 2005 and 2013 and we determined MCS use by recipient age group and transplant year. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify variables associated with continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use within each age group. Results: Among 16,480 HTx recipients the percentage of overall MCS use increased from 23% to 38%, 21% to 41%, and 17% to 42% in age groups 18-39 years, 40-59 years and over 60 years, respectively. This effect was mainly due to an increase in CF LVAD use and primarily in HTx recipients aged over 60. In multivariable analyses, male gender and blood group O were significantly associated with CF LVAD use in all agegroups. Conclusions: Bridge to transplant MCS use increased dramatically between 2005 and 2013 primarily due to increased use of CF LVAD and primarily in higher ages. Pre-HTx CF LVAD use was more frequent in men and blood group O. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

International audience; Background/objectives - In heart failure (HF), activation of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and adrenomedullin (ADM) is adaptive. The activation of these peptides in relation to different HF phenotypes such as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation (HTx) remains poorly characterized. Methods - We measured and compared N-terminal (NT)-proBNP, mid-regional (MR)-proANP and mid-regional (MR)-proADM in 86 patients with HFpEF, 49 patients with HFrEF, 13 patients one year post-LVAD and 22 patients one year post-HTx. We assessed their prognostic impact using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression. Results - In HFpEF, HFrEF, LVAD and HTx, NT-proBNP, median (inter-quartile range), was 1000 (465-2335), 3145 (1475-5190), 1430 (986-2570), and 208 (127-353) pmol/L, p < 0.001. MR-proANP was 313 (192-381), 449 (325-596), 276 (216-305), and 118 (96-163) pmol/L, p < 0.001. MR-proADM was 1.2 (0.9-1.6), 1.3 (0.9-2.0), 0.9 (0.7-1.4), and 0.7 (0.6-0.9) nmol/L, p < 0.001 overall and p = 0.212 HFpEF versus HFrEF. In both HFpEF and HFrEF, NT-proBNP and MR-proANP predicted survival free from HTx or LVAD, independent of age, gender, NYHA class and eGFR, whereas MR-proADM did not. Conclusions - Patterns of the cardiomyocyte stress hormones NT-proBNP and MR-proANP suggest that compared to HFrEF, HFpEF may represent milder disease and LVAD and HTx may represent progressive resolution of HF severity. NT-proBNP and MR-proANP independently predicted prognosis in both HFpEF and HFrEF. In contrast, MR-proADM did not distinguish between HFpEF and HFrEF, did not predict prognosis in either, and may be more non-specific in HF.