Search

Background: Patients experiencing non-ST segment elevation acute-coronary-syndromes (NSTE-ACS) often present with multivessel-coronary-artery-disease (MVD). An immediate complete multivessel revascularization (MVR) - within the index hospitalization - may be considered the default therapeutic strategy, although its risk-to-benefit profile has not been definitively established through dedicated clinical trials., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines, was conducted to assess studies comparing immediate MVR versus a conservative culprit-only revascularization (COR) in NSTE-ACS with MVD. The main endpoints were all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). The incidence of any revascularization or further percutaneous-coronary-interventions (PCIs) were also collected. The primary analyses for the main endpoints were conducted on propensity-matched groups only., Results: A total of 22 studies (182,798 patients) were identified. 7 studies, encompassing 11,372 patients, were included in the primary analysis of propensity score-matched groups. Immediate MVR significantly increased (28%) survival (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90, P < 0.01) along with a 35% reduction in MACE (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.88, P = 0.01) and a 60% decrease in MI (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.63, P < 0.01) during a mean 3-years follow-up compared to the propensity score-matched COR group. Results were consistent in the unmatched analyses., Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports an immediate MVR for improving clinical outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD as compared to a conservative immediate COR. These data prompt further evaluations regarding optimal strategies in the pursuit of MVR, including patient selection, revascularization modality, and assessment methods of revascularization completeness., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Francesco Bianchini received a research grant from Abbott Vascular. Enrico Romagnoli received speaker fees from Abbott, Abiomed and Terumo.Cristina Aurigemma has been involved in advisory board activities by Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic, and Biotronic. Lazzaro Paraggio received speaker fees from Abiomed and Terumo. Mattia Lunardi received speaker fees from Medtronic. Antonio Maria Leone received speakers' fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Menarini, Bayer, Daichii Sankyo, Bruno. Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai has consulted for Amarin, Balmed, Cardionovum, Crannmedical, Endocore Lab, Eukon, Guidotti, Innovheart, Meditrial, Microport, Opsens Medical, Terumo, and Translumina, outside the present work. Carlo Trani and Francesco Burzotta received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Medtronic and Terumo. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Several repair strategies emerged as possible treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the different percutaneous mitral valve repair approaches., Methods: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies until December 11th, 2023. Clinical efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-procedural NYHA functional class <3; the echocardiographic efficacy endpoint was a post-intervention residual MR less than moderate. Safety endpoints and procedural outcome measures were also assessed., Results: Eleven studies were included: 8 [N = 1662 patients, mean follow-up (FUP) 294 days] compared MitraClip® vs Pascal® device, 2 (N = 195 patients) MitraClip® vs Carillon® and 1 study (N = 186 patients) evaluated MitraClip® against Cardioband®. The Pascal®-treated group had lower MR degree compared to the MitraClip®-treated group, without difference in post-intervention mean trans-mitral gradient and in clinical and safety endpoints. A longer procedure time was observed in the Pascal® group, albeit with a lower average number of implanted devices per procedure. The two studies comparing MitraClip® and Carillon® were inconsistent in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes, while the study evaluating MitraClip® vs Cardioband® showed that the latter might confer a significant clinical benefit, with a similar reduction in MR., Conclusions: Pascal® is as safe and clinically effective as MitraClip® in treating patients with MR, with an apparent greater reduction in the magnitude of residual valve insufficiency over the long term. Data on Cardioband® and Carillon® are not robust enough to draw conclusions from the use of such devices., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for the present work., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Routine thrombus aspiration (TA) does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), although data from meta-analyses suggest that patients with high thrombus burden may benefit from it. The impact of TA on left ventricular (LV) functional recovery and remodeling after STEMI remains controversial. We aimed to pool data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of TA on LV function and remodeling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)., Methods: PubMed and CENTRAL databases were scanned for eligible studies. Primary outcome measures were: LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end systolic volume (LVESV) and wall motion score index (WMSI). A primary pre-specified subgroup analysis was performed comparing manual TA with mechanical TA., Results: A total of 28 studies enrolling 4990 patients were included. WMSI was lower in TA group than in control (mean difference [MD] -0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.19 to -0.03). A greater LVEF (MD 1.91, 95% CI 0.76 to 3) and a smaller LVESV (MD -6.19, 95% CI -8.7 to -3.6) were observed in manual TA group compared to control. Meta regressions including patients with left anterior descending artery (LAD) involvement showed an association between TA use and the reduction of both LVEDV and LVESV (z = -2.13, p = 0.03; z = -3.7, p < 0.01) and the improvement in myocardial salvage index (z = 2.04, p = 0.04)., Conclusion: TA is associated with improved LV function. TA technique, total ischemic time and LAD involvement appears to influence TA benefit on post-infarction LV remodeling., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiotoxicity occurs in 5-20% of cancer patients who receive anthracyclines. The aim of this study was to pool all the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the cardio-protective role of statins in patients treated with anthracyclines., Methods: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies up to May 3rd, 2023. A total of 5 RCTs with 808 patients were included. Efficacy endpoints were the rate of anthracycline-mediated cardiotoxicity, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value after anthracycline treatment, and ∆LVEF calculated as the difference in LVEF before and after anthracycline therapy. Safety endpoints [i.e., the incidence of muscle pain and serious adverse events (SAE)] were also assessed., Results: On pooled analysis, the statin-treated group had a lower incidence of cardiotoxicity compared to the placebo group [risk ratio (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence Interval (CI) 0.33-0.83, P = 0.01; I 2  = 0%], as well as higher mean LVEF [Mean difference (MD) 1.88, 95% CI 0.66-3.1, P < 0.01; I 2  = 57.3%)] and a more favorable ∆LVEF during follow-up (MD 2.38, 95% CI -0.03 - +4.79, P = 0.05; I 2  = 99%), despite no significant difference in terms of hospitalization for HF and rate of adverse events. Of note, severe heterogeneity affected the analyses for both LVEF and ΔLVEF., Conclusions: The current meta-analysis of all RCTs conducted so far shows an overall beneficial effect of statins on the risk of anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity and LVEF preservation. No difference was observed in the rate of HF hospitalization. More powered RCTs are needed to fully investigate the impact of statins on prognosis in patients receiving anthracyclines therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.G. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Terumo, outside the present work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for the present work., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Several implant-based remote monitoring strategies are currently tested to optimize heart failure (HF) management by anticipating clinical decompensation and preventing hospitalization. Among these solutions, the modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices have been equipped with sensors allowing continuous monitoring of multiple preclinical markers of worsening HF, including factors of autonomic adaptation, patient activity, and intrathoracic impedance., Objectives: We aimed to assess whether implant-based multiparameter remote monitoring strategy for guided HF management improves clinical outcomes when compared to standard clinical care., Methods: A systematic literature research for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiparameter-guided HF management versus standard of care was performed on PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Poisson regression model with random study effects. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization events, whereas secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary outcome., Results: Our meta-analysis included 6 RCTs, amounting to a total of 4869 patients with an average follow-up time of 18 months. Compared with standard clinical management, the multiparameter-guided strategy reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome (IRR 0.83, 95%CI 0.71-0.99), driven by statistically significant effect on both HF hospitalization events (IRR 0.75, 95%CI 0.61-0.93) and all-cause death (IRR 0.80, 95%CI 0.66-0.96)., Conclusion: Implant-based multiparameter remote monitoring strategy for guided HF management is associated with significant benefit on clinical outcomes compared to standard clinical care, providing a benefit on both hospitalization events and all-cause death., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)