Search

Background Because data on electrical storm (ES) is limited, this study sought to compare the prognosis of patients with ES to those with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on mortality, rehospitalization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods In this retrospective study consecutive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients presenting with ES were compared to patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF); non-ES) on admission from 2002 to 2016. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, secondary endpoints were rehospitalization and MACE at 2.5 years of follow-up. Results 764 consecutive patients with an ICD were included (11% with ES, 89% with VTA). ES was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality (37% vs. 20%, log-rank p = 0.001; HR 2.084; 95% CI 1.416–3.065, p = 0.001). However, only in secondary preventive ICD recipients, ES remained significantly associated with mortality (39% vs. 20%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 2.235, 95% CI 1.378–3.625, p = 0.001). Furthermore, ES was associated with higher rates of rehospitalization (44% vs. 12%, log-rank p = 0.001; HR 4.763, 95% CI 3.237–7.009, p = 0.001), mainly due to VT (22% vs. 4%, p = 0.001) and acute heart failure (AHF) (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.001) and higher rates of MACE (40% vs. 23%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 1.838; 95% CI 1.273–2.654, p = 0.002). Increasing risks of death and rehospitalization were still observed even after multivariable adjustment. Conclusion ES was associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, respectively due to VT and AHF, as well as MACE at 2.5 years compared to patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias apart from ES.

Objective The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with beta-blocker (BB) compared to combined BB plus amiodarone (BB-AMIO) on long-term survival in patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission. Background Data regarding the prognostic outcome of patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with BB and BB-AMIO is limited. Methods A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with BB were compared to patients with BB-AMIO. The primary prognostic endpoint was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were applied. Results A total of 1354 patients was included, 85% treated with BB, 15% with BB-AMIO. Within the unmatched real-life cohort, uni- and multivariable Cox regression models revealed BB associated with improved long-term survival compared to BB-AMIO (univariable: HR = 0.550; p = 0.001, multivariable: HR = 0.712; statistical trend, p = 0.052). After propensity-score matching (n = 186 matched pairs), BB therapy was still associated with improved survival compared to BB-AMIO (mortality rate 18% versus 26%; log rank p = 0.042; HR = 0.634; 95% CI = 0.407–0.988; p = 0.044). Prognostic superiority of BB was mainly observed in patients with LVEF ≥ 35% (HR = 0.463; 95% CI = 0.215–0.997; p = 0.049) and in those without atrial fibrillation (non-AF) (HR = 0.415; 95% CI = 0.202–0.852; p = 0.017). Conclusion BB therapy is associated with improved secondary long-term prognosis compared to BB-AMIO in patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.