Search

Background Women with AMI may have worse outcomes than men. However, it is unclear if this is related to differences in treatment, treatment effect or gender specific factors. We sought to determine whether primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) has a differential impact on infarct size, myocardial perfusion and ST segment resolution in men and women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods A total of 501 AMI patients were prospectively enrolled in the EMERALD study and underwent PCI with or without distal protection. Post hoc gender subset analysis was performed. Results 501 patients (108 women, 393 men) with ST-segment elevation AMI presenting within 6 h underwent primary (or rescue) PCI with stenting and a distal protection device. Women were older, had more hypertension, less prior AMI, smaller BSA, and smaller vessel size, but had similar rates of diabetes (30% versus 20.2%, p = 0.87), LAD infarct, and time-to-reperfusion compared to men. Women more frequently had complete ST-resolution (> 70%) at 30 days (72.8% versus 59.8%, p = 0.02), and smaller infarct size compared to males (12.2 ± 19.6% versus 18.4 ± 18.5%, p = 0.006). At 6 months, TLR (6.9% versus 5.2%) and MACE (11.4% versus 10.3%) were similar for women and men. Conclusions Despite worse comorbidities, women with AMI treated with primary PCI with stenting showed similar early and midterm outcomes compared to men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ischaemia−reperfusion (IR) injury is an important cause of myocardial damage during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are few therapies in widespread clinical use which impact on IR injury and it remains an important and underutilized target for treatment in acute myocardial infarction. This review will examine the translational scientific evidence for ischaemic conditioning and pharmacological agents including conditioning mimetics such as cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory agents, and those which modify myocardial glucose metabolism. We will address the reasons why many trials have failed to demonstrate clinical benefit and emphasize the need to deliver the right therapy to the right patient, at the right time to achieve successful translation of cardioprotection from bench-to-bedside. We critique trial design and offer advice for future translational trials in the field to ensure that effective treatments can be demonstrated clinically to improve patient outcomes during PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The incidence and treatment strategies of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vary by region. Additionally, the clinical spectrum of ACS is changing and outcomes are improving. Aim: We assessed the incidence, treatment strategies, and outcomes of ACS for a well-defined population within a well-established network of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers and non-PCI centers. Methods: The CZECH-2 registry included 1221 consecutive patients (mean age: 68±13years; 63.4% males) admitted for suspected ACS to 32 hospitals (including 4 PCI centers) within four Czech counties (total population: 2,370,841 inhabitants) during a 2-month period. Results: The estimated incidence of confirmed ACS was 2149cases/million/year. In 374 (31%) patients, ACS was ruled out during the hospital stay. Coronary angiography (CAG) was performed in 60% of the patients overall and PCI was performed in 59% of the confirmed ACS patients. Killip classifications II–IV on admission were more common in patients with final diagnosis of non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (37.1% vs. 22.8%; p<0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.7% for the whole study group, 7.3% for STEMI patients, 8.4% for NSTEMI patients, and 1.6% for patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), respectively. Conclusions: Almost one-third of the patients admitted for suspected ACS had a different final diagnosis. Among those with confirmed ACS, the use of CAG, PCI, CABG, and effective medications is rational. Outcome in NSTEMI patients was equivalent to those in STEMI patients, mainly due to the high-risk population in this group. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: There is a paucity of data concerning the clinical outcome of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and near-normal coronary angiograms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and the prognosis of the patients with near-normal coronary angiograms who were registered in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). Methods: The subjects were divided into three groups according to findings from coronary angiograms performed between September 2005 and November 2006. Among 8510 consecutive AMI patients, 372 patients (Group I) had near-normal coronary arteries, 6136 patients (Group II) had one- or two-vessel disease, and 2002 patients (Group III) had three-vessel or left main disease. Results: Clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and major cardiac adverse events (MACE) were analyzed. Group I was younger, had the lower prevalence of DM, and showed the higher percentage of previous angina history compared to the other two groups. Group III showed a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality, but there was no significant difference between Group I and Group II (2.6% in Group II and 2.2% in Group I, p =0.952). Furthermore, MACE at 1month, 6months and 12months revealed no significant difference between Groups I and II (12month MACE: 7.8% in Group I and 12.2% in Group II, p =0.359). Conclusions: Patients with near-normal coronary angiograms had similar clinical outcomes and prognosis compared with one- or two-vessel diseased patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: To examine the impact of primary stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty on long-term outcome (median 8 years) in 117 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from randomized trials. Methods: Enrolled patients were those presenting with STEMI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either Palmaz–Schatz stent implantation (N =25) or balloon angioplasty (N =23) between January and November 1996; or Palmaz–Schatz (N =26), or Cordis coil stent implantation (N =24) or balloon angioplasty (N =19) between February 1998 and March 1999. Results: Patients (67±11 years) arrived to the hospital within median 2.5 h of symptom onset with Killip 1/2/3/4 grade (72/19/7/2%, respectively). The culprit lesion was located in the left anterior descending (50%), right (39%), or left circumflex coronary artery (11%) with TIMI 0/1/2/3 flow (81/5/12/2%, respectively). Clinical/angiographic features were comparable between the 2 groups. During follow-up, there was a significant reduction in cardiac mortality in the stent group (5%) compared to the angioplasty group (17%, log-rank test p =0.04). In addition, the stent group had a lower target lesion revascularization rate (28% versus 52%, p =0.008), and a significantly lower major adverse cardiac event rate (37% versus 67%, p =0.005), than the angioplasty group. Conclusion: Compared to balloon angioplasty, primary stenting resulted in a sustained beneficial effect on cardiac mortality at 8 years. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]