Search

People alive many years after breast (BC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses are increasing. This paper aimed to estimate the indicators of cancer cure and complete prevalence for Italian patients with BC and CRC by stage and age. A total of 31 Italian Cancer Registries (47% of the population) data until 2017 were included. Mixture cure models allowed estimation of net survival (NS); cure fraction (CF); time to cure (TTC, 5‐year conditional NS >95%); cure prevalence (who will not die of cancer); and already cured (prevalent patients living longer than TTC). 2.6% of all Italian women (806,410) were alive in 2018 after BC and 88% will not die of BC. For those diagnosed in 2010, CF was 73%, 99% when diagnosed at stage I, 81% at stage II, and 36% at stages III–IV. For all stages combined, TTC was >10 years under 45 and over 65 years and for women with advanced stages, but ≤1 year for all BC patients at stage I. The proportion of already cured prevalent BC women was 75% (94% at stage I). Prevalent CRC cases were 422,407 (0.7% of the Italian population), 90% will not die of CRC. For CRC patients, CF was 56%, 92% at stage I, 71% at stage II, and 35% at stages III–IV. TTC was ≤10 years for all age groups and stages. Already cured were 59% of all prevalent CRC patients (93% at stage I). Cancer cure indicators by stage may contribute to appropriate follow‐up in the years after diagnosis, thus avoiding patients' discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this population‐based study was to evaluate the impact of being a cancer survivor (CS) on COVID‐19 risk and prognosis during the first wave of the pandemic (27 February 2020 to 13 May 2020) in Reggio Emilia Province. Prevalent cancer cases diagnosed between 1996 and 2019 were linked with the provincial COVID‐19 surveillance system. We compared CS' cumulative incidence of being tested, testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), being hospitalized and dying of COVID‐19 with that of the general population; we compared COVID‐19 prognosis in CS and in patients without cancer. During the study period, 15 391 people (1527 CS) underwent real‐time polymerase chain reaction for SARS‐CoV‐2, of whom 4541 (447 CS) tested positive; 541 (113 CS) died of COVID‐19. CS had higher age‐ and sex‐adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) of testing (1.28 [95% confidence interval, CI = 1.21‐1.35]), of positive test (IRR 1.06 [95% CI = 0.96‐1.18]) and of hospitalization and death (IRR 1.27 [95% CI = 1.09‐1.48] and 1.39 [95%CI = 1.12‐1.71], respectively). CS had worse prognosis when diagnosed with COVID‐19, particularly those below age 70 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of death 5.03; [95% CI = 2.59‐9.75]), while the OR decreased after age 70. The OR of death was higher for CS with a recent diagnosis, that is, <2 years (OR = 2.92; 95% CI = 1.64‐5.21), or metastases (OR = 2.09; 95% CI = 0.88‐4.93). CS showed the same probability of being infected, despite a slightly higher probability of being tested than the general population. Nevertheless, CS were at higher risk of death once infected. What's new Immunosuppressed status caused by cancer or cancer treatment has been suggested to increase the risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and worse outcomes in cancer patients compared to the general population. This study in an Italian province with a high tumour incidence rate that saw a high cumulative COVID‐19 incidence found that, during the first wave, the cumulative incidence of COVID‐19 in cancer survivors was similar to that in the general population, despite their slightly higher probability of being tested. Cancer survivors had a greater risk of hospitalisation and death once infected, especially if aged <70 years or recently diagnosed with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Oceania, North America and north‐western Europe, after decades of increase, cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) rates began to stabilise or decline before 2000. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the reversal of the incidence trend is extending to southern Europe. To obtain a formal confirmation, this nationwide study from Italy investigated the incidence trends by birth cohort. Twenty‐one local cancer registries covering a population of 15 814 455 provided incidence data for primary CMM registered between 1994 and 2013. Trends in age‐standardised rates were analysed using joinpoint regression models and age‐period‐cohort models. Age‐standardised incidence showed a consistent increase throughout the period (estimated annual percent change, 3.6 [95% confidence interval, 3.2‐4.0] among men and 2.5 [2.0‐3.1] among women). This pattern was confirmed by a sensitivity analysis with removal of low‐risk populations of southern Italy. The rates, however, showed a stabilisation or a decrease in men and women aged below 35. Using the cohort of 1949—the median cohort with respect to the number of cases for both genders—as a reference, the incidence rate ratio increased for successive cohorts born until 1973 (women) and 1975 (men), and subsequently tended to decline. For the most recent cohorts in both genders, the risk of disease returned to the level of the cohort of 1949. The changes observed in the latest generations can be interpreted as the earliest manifestations of a birth‐cohort‐dependent incidence decrease. Our study adds to previous data indicating that the reversal of the long‐term upward incidence trend of CMM is extending to southern Europe. What's new? After increasing for many years, malignant melanoma rates began to stabilise or decline in many regions before 2000. Is this also true for southern Europe? In the current study, the authors found that melanoma rates have also began to decline in Italy. The reversal of the long‐term, worldwide increase in melanoma risk seen in other Caucasian populations thus appears to extend to southern Europe. These results indicate that primary prevention strategies have been effective in modifying sun‐exposure habits in this region, and should continue to be reinforced via public health messaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the impact of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening on stage distribution at diagnosis, and to estimate relative incidence rates by stage in screened at first and subsequent rounds vs. unscreened. We included all incident cases occurring in 2000–2008 in 50‐ to 71‐year‐olds residing in areas with an FIT‐screening programme. Multinomial logistic models were computed to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) of stages I and IV, compared to stage II + III, adjusting for age, sex, geographical area, and incidence year. Proportions were then used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) by stage for screened subjects at the first and at subsequent rounds vs. unscreened subjects, applying the expected changes in overall incidence during screening phases. 11,663 cancers were included: 5965 in not‐invited and 5,698 in invited subjects, 3,425 of whom attendees. Compared to not‐invited, invited subjects had RRR 2.04 (95% CI: 1.84; 2.46) of stage I and RRR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) of stage IV. Differences were stronger comparing attendees vs. nonattendees. Interval cancers were more frequently stage I compared to non‐invited (RRR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.15; 2.04), but there was no difference for stage IV. IRRs in screened at first round vs. unscreened were 4.6 (95% CI: 4.2; 5.1), 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3; 1.5) and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6; 0.9) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively; in the following rounds the IRRs of screened vs. unscreened were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2; 1.6), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7; 0.9) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1; 0.4) for stages I, II + III and IV, respectively. FIT screening reduces the incidence of metastatic cancers by about 70% after the first round. What's new? Screening programs are intended to reduce mortality by early diagnosis. In this study, the authors evaluated the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer. They calculated the effect of FIT screening on stage at diagnosis, and estimated the relative incidence rates by stage. Individuals who attended screening had far higher incidence of stage I cancer, and lower incidence of stage IV, than those not screened. Metastatic cancer incidence, they found, decreased by about 70% at the first round of screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Filamin A (FLNA) is poorly expressed in adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) compared to adenomas (ACA). Its presence is associated to a less aggressive tumour behaviour, potentially due to its role in negatively regulating IGF1R signalling. Upregulation of G2/M Wee1 kinase was shown in FLNA-deficient mouse neural progenitor cells, and it has been reported in several tumours. This study explored Wee1 expression in ACC and its regulation by FLNA, the effects of Wee1 inhibitor AZD1775, and the impact of FLNA on its efficacy in ACC cell lines and primary cells. Analysis of FLNA and Wee1 proteins revealed elevated Wee1 and reduced FLNA in ACC compared to normal adrenal gland. FLNA knockdown increased Wee1 protein in NCI-H295R, MUC-1, and in primary ACC cells. Higher p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 were shown in FLNA-silenced MUC-1, while decreased Wee1, p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 resulted after FLNA overexpression. Wee1 reduction was reverted by lactacystin treatment and FLNA transfection increased p-Wee1 (Ser123), suggesting FLNA's role in targeting Wee1 for degradation. AZD1775 dose-dependently reduced proliferation and viability in ACC cell lines and primary cultures, and it triggered MUC-1 cell death. Similar effects were induced by Wee1 silencing. FLNA depletion augmented AZD1775's efficacy in reducing proliferation and potentiating apoptosis in MUC-1 and primary cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated that FLNA regulates Wee1 expression by promoting its degradation, suggesting that low FLNA typical of ACC leads to increased Wee1 with consequent cancer cells growth. It proposes Wee1 inhibition as a new potential therapeutic approach for ACC, particularly for those lacking FLNA., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)