Search

• In vitro models may inform on the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. • High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin vs. A. baumannii and polymyxin/fosfomycin vs. K. pneumoniae. • High or moderate synergism was also shown for imipenem/amikacin vs. P. aeruginosa. • Combinations including old antibiotics appear promising, while high-quality studies on novel antibiotics are lacking. • Correctly designed in vitro studies may highlight potential synergies to test in human trials or to optimise further tests. The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time–kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66–1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21–1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • We report real-life clinical experience with ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) since its approval in Italy. • C/T appears to be effective for many serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, including VAP and HAP. • Septic patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy had a higher risk of clinical failure. ABSTRACT This study describes the largest clinical experience using ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) for different Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. A retrospective study was performed at 22 hospitals in Italy (June 2016–March 2018). All adult patients treated with ≥4 days of C/T were enrolled. Successful clinical outcome was defined as complete resolution of clinical signs/symptoms related to P. aeruginosa infection and lack of microbiological evidence of infection. C/T treatment was documented in 101 patients with diverse infections, including nosocomial pneumonia (31.7%), acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (20.8%), complicated UTI (13.9%), complicated IAI (12.9%), bone infection (8.9%) and primary bacteraemia (5.9%). Over one-half of P. aeruginosa strains were XDR (50.5%), with 78.2% of isolates resistant to at least one carbapenem. C/T was used as first-line therapy in 39 patients (38.6%). When used as second-line or later, the most common reasons for discontinuation of previous antibiotics were in vitro resistance of P. aeruginosa and clinical failure of previous therapy. Concomitant antibiotics were reported in 35.6% of patients. C/T doses were 1.5 g q8h in 70 patients (69.3%) and 3 g q8h in 31 patients (30.7%); median duration of C/T therapy was 14 days. Overall clinical success was 83.2%. Significant lower success rates were observed in patients with sepsis or receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Mild adverse events were reported in only three patients. C/T demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile regardless of the infection type. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of clinical failure with C/T therapy in septic patients receiving CRRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]