Search

Abstract The mechanical behaviour of two elastomeric fuel tank sealants was investigated. Laboratory tests were conducted on two sealants, an epoxy cured polythioether and a manganese cured polysulfide. Tensile, planar tension and torsion tests were performed to characterize and understand the response of the sealants under quasi-static loading. Single lap joint tests in tension were also carried out using four different sealant layer thicknesses and two types of adherend (aluminium and steel). The adherends were either primed with an epoxy primer or otherwise conventionally treated (e.g. grit blasted). Experimental results showed a decrease in joint strength with increasing sealant layer thickness. Emphasis was given to the understanding of the failure and the prediction of the strength of the single lap joints. Predicted failure loads were derived by analytical calculations and finite element simulation of the joints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In automotive construction, adhesive bonding can be used for joining metals, plastics or combinations of the two, and it offers the further advantage that, because the joints are continuous, an overall increase in body stiffness is achieved, thus enabling thinner material to be used. Because of their ability to absorb energy adhesive joints can also contribute to the impacted system. The objective of this work is to investigate the behavior of a flexible adhesive under impact loading using the single lap joint configuration. This adhesive showed a high strain to failure with good strength. These features of the adhesive under impact loading improve structural crashworthiness. Results showed that the lap joint strength increases considerably under impact loading compared with those under quasi-static loading and that there is a relationship between the joint performance and the loading speeds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This special issue of the International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives (IJAA) contains selected papers presented at the 5th International Conference on Structural Adhesive Bonding (AB 2019). In order to disseminate the work presented in AB 2019, selected papers were prepared which resulted in the present Special Issue. The criterion adopted for inclusion in this Special Issue was these papers being related to "Joint Design" which resulted in 25 papers. [Extracted from the article]

Dimensioning adhesively bonded joints remains a challenging task. Their diversity in geometry and material (including combinations thereof), characteristic stress peaks, scatter and brittleness are aspects few practitioners are prepared to handle for dimensioning purposes. As developed in the first part of this two-part paper, direct stress based methods, despite diverse fudging techniques, proved to be unsuitable. This left the field open for fracture mechanics, which, however, departed very much from the engineering reality leading to only lukewarm acceptance from practitioners. Almost unnoticed, probabilistic methods, much closer to classical mechanics, may offer an alternative. Based upon the presentation, in the first part of this series, of the concepts, the authors suggested an implementation in terms of design procedure. The second part of this two-part paper, is dedicated to the presentation of several examples, from available literature, of adhesively bonded joints involving a large variety of typologies (single and double-lap, tubular, and hybrid joints) and materials (fibre-reinforced polymers, steel, wood). The focus therein is set on practitioner oriented aspects, in particular on techniques for implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adhesive bonding is increasingly being considered by engineers for load-bearing joints to complement, or supplement, traditional mechanical fasteners for a large variety of structural materials, including fibre-reinforced polymers, timber, and steel. However, practitioners are still largely applying analysis and design methods, including codes and standards, that rely heavily on fudge factors. This is not due to the relative novelty of the joining technique, and the complexity of the associated mechanics. This paper guides the reader through some of the most important aspects of adhesively bonded joints, and the reasons why classical mechanics can only be applied in conjunction with fudge factors. Subsequently, the principles of fracture mechanics (FM) are presented; it is shown that, despite its conceptual strengths, FM is rather difficult to implement, as it introduces mechanical concepts practitioners are not familiar with. Then probabilistic methods (PM) are introduced; it is shown that PM can be considered as an extension of classical mechanics, as they can be easily implemented as a post-processing routine of the latter. Additionally, it is shown that PM, unlike FM, neither require specific test procedures for characterisation, nor complicated numerical analyses. Lastly, the paper offers a step-by-step guide for the implementation of PM for the dimensioning of adhesively bonded joints. The second part of this paper illustrates the latter analysis and design of adhesively bonded joints on a series of examples involving FRP, timber, and steel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]