Search

We retrospectively examined the feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for de novo stenosis in large coronary vessels (LV; pre- or postprocedural reference vessel diameter ≥ 2.75 mm) in comparison with placement of drug-eluting stents (DESs).Consecutive de novo stenotic lesions in the LV electively and successfully treated with either PCB (n = 73) or DESs (n = 81) from January 2016 to December 2018 at our center were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The impact of PCB on TLF was examined using Cox proportional hazards models by including 39 variables. The secondary endpoint, angiographic restenosis, defined as a follow-up percent diameter stenosis > 50, was examined in angiographic follow-up lesions after PCB angioplasty (n = 56) and DES placement (n = 53). This retrospective investigation was conducted in July 2022.The mean PCB size and length were 3.23 ± 0.42 and 18.4 ± 4.3 mm, respectively. The TLF frequency in the PCB group (6.8% during the mean observational interval of 1536 ± 538 days) was not significantly different from that in the DES group (14.6%, 1344 ± 606 days, P = 0.097). PCB was not a significant predictor of TLF in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.424; 95%CI: 0.15-1.21; P = 0.108). There was no angiographic restenosis after PCB angioplasty.The present observational single-center study showed that PCB for de novo stenosis in the LV had no significant adverse impact on TLF and had favorable angiographic outcomes.

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, lesion-based study to examine the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for de novo coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by comparing them with those of drug-eluting stents (DESs).A total of 309 consecutive lesions in patients with ACS who were successfully treated by emergent procedures using either a DCB (n = 107) or a DES between January 2016 and December 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death without mortality due to ACS, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any target lesion revascularization, including acute occlusion, after DCB use and definite stent thrombosis after DES placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to adjust the 36 baseline variables. Retrospective investigations were conducted in January 2021.Baseline adjustment yielded 91 lesions in each group, with a mean balloon size of 3.02 ± 0.22 mm and a mean length of 20.9 ± 6.2 mm in the DCB group. The frequency of TLF in the DCB group (9.9% during the mean observational interval of 671 ± 508 days) was not significantly different from that in the DES group (13.2% during a period of 626 ± 543 days, P = 0.467). The cumulative TLF-free ratio in the DCB group was not significantly different from that in the DES group (P = 0.475, log-rank test).The present propensity score-matched comparison showed statistically equivalent midterm clinical outcomes after DCB use to those of DES placement for de novo lesions in patients with ACS treated by emergent procedures.