Search

The past 20 years have seen a proliferation of scientific data on the pathophysiology of asthma. Most of these data were generated in mice using tool reagents, gene-deficient or transgenic animals. In contrast, studies on disease pathogenesis in patients are scarce. Previously, a good novel antiasthma target for drug development was one that abrogated asthma in mice when it was knocked out, neutralized or induced asthma when it was overexpressed. This type of approach led to many drug candidates that worked in mice but unfortunately failed in patients, thereby demonstrating that the results of experiments in mice are not always predictive of clinical efficacy. Currently, there is active debate about the use of mouse models in drug discovery. In this review, we summarize the obstacles and challenges faced when using experimental mouse models of asthma in drug discovery. We propose that the initial selection of a novel drug target begins with defining the unmet medical need and specific patient population, followed by a thorough evaluation of available human data, and, only then, well-planned and executed mouse asthma experiments. Using this approach, we argue that mouse models lend support for the target when the models are tailored for the specific asthma patient population, and that targeted, reliable, and predictive mouse models can indeed improve and accelerate the drug discovery process., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Repeated allergen administration is a well-established therapeutic strategy for desensitizing patients with allergic disease. Similarly, repeated inhalation of antigen by mice with established allergen-induced asthma suppresses allergic inflammation. The mechanisms underlying antigen-dependent suppression of allergic immune responses remain unknown. In previous studies, we found that repeated aerosol antigen challenges in sensitized mice reduced eosinophils while increasing plasma cells and antibody in the lungs. We sought to test whether plasma cells and antibody played a role in suppression of allergic disease., Methods: We primed wild-type and B-cell-deficient (microMT) mice with 25 microg ovalbumin (OVA) precipitated in alum on days 0 and 5, nebulized weekly with 1% OVA, 1 h, twice daily, for up to 6 weeks, and assessed lung inflammation, mucus hypersecretion, and IgE/IgG1., Results: Kinetic studies revealed that initial aerosol exposure induced high numbers of eosinophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages within lung infiltrates and increased mucus production in wild-type mice. After 3-4 weeks of antigen exposure, eosinophils diminished while lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages and mucus hypersecretion increased. However, by 6 weeks, lung inflammation and mucus hypersecretion were dramatically reduced. In contrast, repeated aerosol challenges maintained OVA-specific IgG1 and IgE production. Repeated aerosol antigen challenges in microMT mice resulted in reduced lung inflammation and mucus hypersecretion and the development of smooth muscle hypertrophy of the pulmonary microvasculature., Conclusions: B cells and antibody do not appear to play a role in antigen-dependent suppression of allergic responses in mice., (Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Experimental mouse models of allergic asthma established almost 10 years ago offered new opportunities to study disease pathogenesis and to develop new therapeutics. These models focused on the factors governing the allergic immune response, on modeling clinical behavior of allergic asthma, and led to insights into pulmonary pathophysiology. Although mouse models rarely completely reproduce all the features of human disease, after sensitization and respiratory tract challenges with antigen, wild-type mice develop a clinical syndrome that closely resembles allergic asthma, characterized by eosinophilic lung inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), increased IgE, mucus hypersecretion, and eventually, airway remodeling. There are, however, differences between mouse and human physiology that threaten to limit the value of mouse models. Three examples of such differences relate to both clinical manifestations of disease and underlying pathogenesis. First, in contrast to patients who have increased methacholine-induced AHR even when they are symptom-free, mice exhibit only transient methacholine-induced AHR following allergen exposure. Second, chronic allergen exposure in patients leads to chronic allergic asthma, whereas repeated exposures in sensitized mice causes suppression of disease. Third, IgE and mast cells, in humans, mediate early- and late-phase allergic responses, though both are unnecessary for the generation of allergic asthma in mice. Taken together, these observations suggest that mouse models of allergic asthma are not exact replicas of human disease and thus, question the validity of these models. However, observations from mouse models of allergic asthma support many existing paradigms, although some novel discoveries in mice have yet to be verified in patients. This review presents an overview of the clinical aspects of disease in mouse models of allergic asthma emphasizing (1). the factors influencing the pathophysiological responses during the initiation and perpetuation of disease, (2). the utility of mouse models for studying clinical manifestations of disease, and (3). the applicability of mouse models for testing new treatments for allergic asthma., (Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel)