1. Lung cancer and socio-economic status: inextricably linked to place of residence
- Author
-
David Hart, Matthew Conron, Eve Denton, Gavin M. Wright, and Prue Russell
- Subjects
Gerontology ,education.field_of_study ,Multivariate analysis ,Referral ,business.industry ,Population ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cohort ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,Lung cancer ,Prospective cohort study ,business ,Socioeconomic status ,Cohort study ,Demography - Abstract
Background The association between socioeconomic status (SES) and lung cancer is internationally established but in Australia this relationship remains ill defined. Aims To examine the association between SES, place of residence and lung cancer outcomes in a large Australian cohort. Methods 2369 consecutive lung cancer patients managed by St Vincent's Hospital lung multidisciplinary meeting between 2001–2014 were included. Postcode data stratified participants by Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas, a validated measure of SES, and by geographical location, an important socioeconomic factor in Australia. Results There was no difference between socioeconomic groups in age (68 years), sex (63% males) or presentation (75% symptomatic). Low socioeconomic patients had increased smoking rates and a trend towards less adenocarcinoma. More low SES patients were from rural locations, had a greater frequency of earlier stage disease and curative treatment with higher overall survival even after multivariate analysis. When stratified for socioeconomic status, overall 5-year survival was significantly better in the low SES group (33% vs 24%, n = 2275, p = 0.02), although stage-stratified survival was similar in all socioeconomic groups. Conclusions Low SES patients were more frequently from rural locations and unexpectedly had earlier stage disease and higher overall survival. The excellent outcomes in rural and lower SES patients is reassuring but suggests that there is a population of these patients with advanced lung cancer who are not referred for multidisciplinary care. Further studies are required to better define this group and determine the barriers to referral to improve overall lung cancer outcomes.
- Published
- 2017