Search

Background and Aims The TRI-SCORE is a recently published risk score for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve surgery (ITVS). The aim of this study is to externally validate the ability of the TRI-SCORE in predicting in-hospital and long-term mortality following ITVS. Methods A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried out to identify all patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve repair or replacement from March 1997 to March 2021. The TRI-SCORE was calculated for all patients. Discrimination of the TRI-SCORE was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Accuracy of the models was tested calculating the Brier score. Finally, a COX regression was employed to evaluate the relationship between the TRI-SCORE value and long-term mortality. Results A total of 176 patients were identified and the median TRI-SCORE was 3 (1–5). The cut-off value identified for increased risk of isolated ITVS was 5. Regarding in-hospital outcomes, the TRI-SCORE showed high discrimination (area under the curve 0.82), and high accuracy (Brier score 0.054). This score showed also very good performance in predicting long-term mortality (at 10 years HR: 1.47, 95% CI [1.31–1.66], p 0.80 at 1–5 and 10 years) and high accuracy values (Brier score 0.179). Conclusions This external validation confirm the good performance of the TRI-SCORE in predicting in-hospital mortality. Moreover, the score showed also very good performance in predicting the long-term mortality.

OBJECTIVES Aim of this study was to evaluate arrhythmic burden of patients with Barlow’s disease and significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and assess the impact of mitral repair on ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in this group of subjects. METHODS We prospectively included 88 consecutive patients with Barlow’s disease referred to our Institution from February 2021 to May 2022. All enrolled patients underwent 24-h Holter monitoring before surgery. Sixty-three of them completed 3 months echocardiographic and Holter follow-up. Significant arrhythmic burden was defined as ≥1% premature ventricular beats/24 h or at least one episode of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT or ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS At baseline, 29 patients (33%) were arrhythmogenic (AR), while 59 (67%) were not [non-arrhythmogenic (NAR)]. AR subjects tended to be more often females with history of palpitations. Sixty-three patients completed 3-months follow-up. Twenty of them (31.7%) were AR at baseline and 43 (68.3%) were not. Among AR patients, 9 (45%) remained AR after mitral surgery, while 11 (55%) became NAR. Considering NAR subjects at baseline, after mitral valve repair 8 (18.6%) evolved into AR, while 35 (81.4%) remained NAR. A higher prevalence of pre-operative MAD was found among patients experiencing VA reduction if compared with patients who remained arrhythmogenic (63.6% vs 11.1%, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS In our experience, one-third of Barlow’s patients referred for mitral surgery showed a significant arrhythmic burden. Almost half of the subjects arrhythmogenic at baseline were free from significant VA after mitral repair. However, a minority (18.6%) of subjects without arrhythmic burden at baseline experienced significant VA at follow-up.