Search

This study examined the effects of virtual and physical robots (VPR) using in different learning stages (simple session/complex session) in a robotics programming course. A quasi-experimental design was implemented with 84 junior high school students from two classes. One class with 44 students used combination of VPR strategy for learning, whereas the other class with 42 students used only physical robots (the PR strategy) to learn the same content materials. Results showed that no significant difference was found in the students' learning attitude, programming skills, and learning engagement between VPR and PR, while significant difference existed in engineering design ability and cognitive load, no matter in simple or complex learning sessions. Although the VPR strategy is not always better than the PR one, it has unique advantages on facilitating students' higher-order thinking in solving complex problem, as well as reducing their cognitive load. These findings highlight that VPR is more valuable to the engineering design tasks than PR, and indicate a potential direction in the future to integrate Virtual Reality/Augment Reality into robotics education.

In recent years, Game-Based Learning (GBL) has been widely adopted in various educational settings. This paper aims to review empirical studies that adopt GBL in the field of AI education and explore its future research perspectives. After a systematic keyword search in the online database and a snowballing approach, a total of 125 empirical papers with 133 studies were targeted as samples. Results indicated that the games in AI education are mainly fell into five categories: Puzzle games are the most used in the curriculum (27.07%), followed by Reasoning strategy games (23.31%), Robot games (18.05%), Role-playing games (9.02%) and Simulation games (6.77%). Among them, 22.39% of games were with real characters, 11.94% were with virtual characters and 64.18% were with no characters. Besides, games were used in three main forms in AI education: games as teaching tools (78.95%), games as student works (12.03%), and games as a competing mechanism (9.02%). Researchers mainly paid attention to the effect of GBL on students' Opinions and Attitude (52.96%) and Learning achievement (24.04%), while the other three categories such as Skills and ability, Interaction, and Cognition were not extensively measured. The cross-sectional analysis, research gaps, and potential directions for future research were also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Technology-Based Embodied Learning (TBEL) is a hotspot in learning science. By systematically reviewing 49 SSCI journal articles, this paper revealed the relationship between any two of sample group, sample size, duration, subject distribution, research design, and measurement instrument, etc. In general, the major results showed TBEL is helpful for students to enhance the knowledge comprehension and skills, improve long-term retention and transfer, et al. But sometimes, the effect of embodied learning may be limited by types of learning, age of learners, or redundant strategy. We also derive some limitations and future research directions from reviewed papers. ABSTRACT Technology-Based Embodied Learning (TBEL) has become a hotspot in learning science. This paper systematically reviewed 49 SSCI journal articles. The results mainly indicate that: (1) The learning phase is proportional to sample size; (2) The sample size of experiments is inversely proportional to the duration; (3) The experiment duration may be inversely proportional to the learning phase; (4) The integration between experiments and various subjects in middle and high school still needs to be improved; (5) A variety of measurement tools are used for almost every type of research design; (6) TBEL has been integrated with a variety of embodied learning theories in various disciplines, especially mathematics and language; and (7) Comparing with other interaction modes, tangible interaction is more conducive to achieve a higher degree of embodied learning, et al. In general, the major results showed TBEL is helpful for students to enhance the knowledge comprehension and skills, improve long-term retention and transfer, achieve high levels of engagement and attention, increase positive learning attitude, and decrease cognitive load. But sometimes, the effect of embodied learning may be limited by types of learning, age of learners, or redundant strategy. We also derive some future research directions from reviewed papers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]