Search

Objectives: We evaluated 4384 procedures performed between 1957 and 2018, collected in the National Register for Congenital Heart Defects, conducted on 997 patients with 1823 pulmonary valve replacements (PVRs), including 226 implanted via catheter [transcatheter valve (TCV)]. Main study targets are as follows: TCV benefit, valve type durability, decade-wise treatment changes and procedure frequencies over the lifetime of a PVR patient., Methods: We studied TCV impact on surgical valve replacement (via Kaplan-Meier); pulmonary valve type-specific performance (Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions with age group as stratification or ordinary variable); procedure interval changes over the decades (Kaplan-Meier); procedure load, i.e. frequency of any procedure/surgical PVR/interventional or surgical PVR by patient age (multistate analyses)., Results: TCV performance was equivalent to surgical PVRs and extended durability significantly. Homografts were most durable; Contegras lasted comparably less in older; and Hancock devices lasted less in younger patients. Matrix P-valves showed poorer performance. Age group stratification improves the precision of valve-specific explantation hazard estimations. The current median interval between procedures is 2.6 years; it became significantly shorter in most age groups below 40 years. At 30 years, 80% of patients had undergone ≥3 procedures, 20% ≥3 surgical PVRs and 42% ≥3 surgical or interventional PVRs., Conclusions: TCVs doubled freedom from explantation of conventional valves. Homografts' age group-specific explantation hazard ratio was lowest; Matrix P's hazard ratio was highest. Age-stratified Cox regressions improve the precision of prosthesis durability evaluations. The median time between procedures for PVR patients shortened significantly to 2.6 years. At 30 years, 42% had ≥3 PVRs., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Consensus paper of the German Society of Cardiovascular Engineering, the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, the German Society of Cardiology, the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology, the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine and the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Detailed anatomical information is essential for planning of surgical therapy in patients with congenital heart disease. We wanted to determine whether cinematic rendering, the novel 3-dimensional visualization technique, could help paediatric cardiac surgeons achieve better preoperative visualization of the extracardiac anatomy in patients with complex congenital heart defects. Therefore, cinematic rendering was compared to the traditional volume rendering technique by means of a questionnaire with predefined criteria., Methods: Picture sets from 20 infant patients (mean age = 17 days) were generated from computed tomography data with both the cinematic rendering and the volume rendering techniques. These were presented side by side in a digital high-resolution portfolio without labelling them. Three experienced paediatric cardiac surgeons were provided with these portfolios and a questionnaire. They were asked to evaluate the images individually in predefined categories on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = 'fully acceptable' to 4 = 'unacceptable'., Results: Cinematic rendering scored significantly better values on the Likert scale in 7 of 9 categories, namely 'spatial impression in general', 'depth perception', 'delineation of the atrial appendages/pulmonary veins/peripheral pulmonary arteries', 'assessability of the anterior interventricular sulcus' and 'assessability of the aortic arch branches'., Conclusions: Cinematic rendering is a valuable software tool, and our data suggest that it provides significantly better visualization than volume rendering. The surgeons appraised improved depth perception and delineation of structures adjacent to the heart as the most significant advantages., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In this study, we report our experience on the primary and staged surgical approaches for common arterial trunk (CAT) repair., Methods: Between August 2003 and February 2015, 16 consecutive patients underwent CAT repair in our institution. Two different approaches have been followed: group 'primary repair' (PR) consists of patients suitable for straightforward CAT repair, who underwent surgery electively at 1-3 months of age (n = 13); group 'staged repair' (SR) consists of critically ill neonates with CAT and poor preoperative status or coexisting interrupted aortic arch (n = 3). They underwent staged CAT repair with aortic arch repair and right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) shunt within the neonatal period, followed by an intracardiac repair later in infancy., Results: Median age at initial surgical treatment was 8 days (range: 7-21 days) in group SR and 34 days (range: 14-91 days) in group PR (P = 0.03). Mean Aristotle Comprehensive Complexity score was 11 ± 0.6 (range: 11-13) in group PR and 18 ± 3.1 (range: 15-21) in group SR (P < 0.01). Follow-up was completed with a median duration of 3.6 years (range: 8 months to 11 years). There was neither early nor late mortality in both groups. In group SR, the median interval to second stage surgery was 216 days (range: 216-260 days). Seven patients (54%) in group PR required reoperation for RV-PA conduit failure (n = 4), truncal valve repair/replacement (n = 2) or both (n = 1). After initial surgery, Kaplan-Meier freedom from reoperation after 1, 2 and 8 years was 77 ± 12, 68 ± 13 and 20 ± 17% in group PR, and 0% in group SR (log-rank P < 0.01). Although all patients in group SR required reoperation to complete the anatomical correction (second stage procedure), there was no surgical reintervention of truncal valve and aortic arch thereafter., Conclusions: Routine elective CAT repair could be safely performed at 1-3 months of age. However, neonatal CAT repair could be associated with a higher mortality especially in the presence of an interrupted aortic arch. In such cases, a staged CAT repair seems to be associated with favourable postoperative course and improved hospital survival, despite the inevitable need for reoperation, which can be performed at a relatively low risk., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)