Search

To test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a closed-loop blood sampling system and blood conservation bundle.Single site, parallel group, pilot randomised control trial comparing open system sampling to closed system sampling and conservation bundle aligned with national guidelines. Randomisation sequence was generated by an independent statistician and allocation concealment maintained via sealed opaque envelopes. The study setting was the general intensive care unit of a major metropolitan public hospital in Queensland, Australia. Participants were ≥ 18 years who had an arterial catheter inserted in intensive care. Main outcome measures included trial feasibility, blood sample loss, haematocrit (HCT) change, and packed red blood cell transfusion use.Eighty patients were randomised (n = 39 open group, n = 41 closed group). Characteristics in each group were equal at baseline with overall median age 60 years (IQR 48.6-70.4), 58 % male, and median APACHE II score 16 (IQR 11-22). The proportion of patients eligible was 29 % and missed eligible was 65 %. Otherwise, feasibility criteria were met with proportion of eligible patients agreeing to enrolment 99 %, 100 % of patients receiving allocated treatment; only 1 % of data missing. Analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mean daily blood sample losses (open 32.7 (SD 1.58) mL vs closed 15.5 (SD 5.79) mL, t = -8.454, df = 78, p 0.001).A large, multi-site trial is feasible with enhanced eligibility criteria, increased recruitment support. The intervention reduced daily blood sample volumes and transfusion use. Further trials are required to provide both effectiveness and implementation outcomes.

To compare time to incidence, extent of incidence and severity of heel pressure injury with a heel off-loading boot (intervention) or pillows (control).Multi-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial of 394 critically ill patients. Patients were randomised to the intervention or control for heel offloading.Three hospital intensive care units; two in greater Sydney, Australia and one in regional New South Wales, Australia.Time to intensive care unit-acquired pressure injury in heels of patients without pre-existing heel pressure injury within 28 days from intensive care unit admission.incidence of heel pressure injury within 28 days of intensive care unit admission; severity of intensive care unit-acquired heel pressure injuries; occurrence of plantar contractures (a change in ankle dorsiflexion of 5° or greater) within 28 days of admission.Within 28 days of admission, one pressure injury was recorded in the intervention group and 11 in the control group. Hazard of pressure injury incidence within 28 days of admission was significantly lower (p = 0.0239) in heels assigned to the intervention (hazard ratio 0.0896 [95% CI 0.0110, 0.727]). Odds of pressure injury incidence within 28 days of admission were significantly lower (p = 0.0261) in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.0883 [95% CI 0.0104, 0.749]). The pressure injury recorded in the intervention group was superficial (stage 1) whereas those recorded in the control group were more severe (stage 2 to 4).The heel-offloading boot used in this study significantly reduced heel pressure injury occurrence compared with heel offloading using pillows.

Summary Objective To identify factors associated with critical care nurses' engagement in end-of-life care practices. Methods Multivariable regression modelling was undertaken on 392 responses to an online self-report survey of end-of-life care practices and factors influencing practice by Australian critical care nurses'. Univariate general linear models were built for six end-of-life care practice areas. Results Six statistically significant ( p F (3, 377)=40.53, adjusted R 2 23.8%; Environmental modification F (5, 380)=19.55, adjusted R 2 19.4%; Emotional support F (10, 366)=12.10, adjusted R 2 22.8%; Patient and family centred decision making F (8, 362)=17.61 adjusted R 2 26.4%; Symptom management F (8, 376)=7.10, adjusted R 2 11.3%; and Spiritual support F (9, 367)=14.66, adjusted R 2 24.6%. Stronger agreement with values consistent with a palliative approach, and greater support for patient and family preferences were associated with higher levels of engagement in end-of-life care practices. Higher levels of preparedness and access to opportunities for knowledge acquisition were associated with engagement in the interpersonal practices of patient and family centred decision making and emotional support. Conclusion This study provides evidence for interventions to address factors associated with nurse engagement to increase participation in all end-of-life care practice areas.

Summary Objective To explore how registered nurses (RNs) in the general ward perceive discharge processes and practices for patients recently discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). Background Patients discharged from the ICU environment often require complicated and multifaceted care. The ward-based RN is at the forefront of the care of this fragile patient population, yet their views and perceptions have seldom been explored. Design A qualitative grounded theory design was used to guide focus group interviews with the RN participants. Methods Five semi-structured focus group interviews, including 27 RN participants, were conducted in an Australian metropolitan tertiary referral hospital in 2011. Data analyses of transcripts, field notes and memos used concurrent data generation, constant comparative analysis and theoretical sampling. Results Results yielded a core category of ‘two worlds’ stressing the disconnectedness between ICU and the ward setting. This category was divided into sub categories of ‘communication disconnect’ and ‘remember the family’. Properties of ‘what we say’, ‘what we write’, ‘transfer’ and ‘information needs’ respectively were developed within those sub-categories. Conclusion The discharge process for patients within the ICU setting is complicated and largely underappreciated. There are fundamental, misunderstood differences in prioritisation and care of patients between the areas, with a deep understanding of practice requirements of ward based RNs not being understood. The findings of this research may be used to facilitate inter departmental communications and progress practice development.

Objective: Diarrhoea in the enterally tube fed (ETF) intensive care unit (ICU) patient is a multifactorial problem. Diarrhoeal aetiologies in this patient cohort remain debatable; however, the consequences of diarrhoea have been well established and include electrolyte imbalance, dehydration, bacterial translocation, peri anal wound contamination and sleep deprivation. This study examined the incidence of diarrhoea and explored factors contributing to the development of diarrhoea in the ETF, critically ill, adult patient. ---------- Method: After institutional ethical review and approval, a single centre medical chart audit was undertaken to examine the incidence of diarrhoea in ETF, critically ill patients. Retrospective, non-probability sequential sampling was used of all emergency admission adult ICU patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. ---------- Results: Fifty patients were audited. Faecal frequency, consistency and quantity were considered important criteria in defining ETF diarrhoea. The incidence of diarrhoea was 78%. Total patient diarrhoea days (r = 0.422; p = 0.02) and total diarrhoea frequency (r = 0.313; p = 0.027) increased when the patient was ETF for longer periods of time. Increased severity of illness, peripheral oxygen saturation (Sp02), glucose control, albumin and white cell count were found to be statistically significant factors for the development of diarrhoea. ---------- Conclusion: Diarrhoea in ETF critically ill patients is multi-factorial. The early identification of diarrhoea risk factors and the development of a diarrhoea risk management algorithm is recommended.

Objective: The aim of this literature review is to identify the role of probiotics in the management of enteral tube feeding (ETF) diarrhoea in critically ill patients.---------- Background: Diarrhoea is a common gastrointestinal problem seen in ETF patients. The incidence of diarrhoea in tube fed patients varies from 2% to 68% across all patients. Despite extensive investigation, the pathogenesis surrounding ETF diarrhoea remains unclear. Evidence to support probiotics to manage ETF diarrhoea in critically ill patients remains sparse.---------- Method: Literature on ETF diarrhoea and probiotics in critically ill, adult patients was reviewed from 1980 to 2010. The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Science Direct, Medline and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) electronic databases were searched using specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Key search terms used were: enteral nutrition, diarrhoea, critical illness, probiotics, probiotic species and randomised clinical control trial (RCT).---------- Results: Four RCT papers were identified with two reporting full studies, one reporting a pilot RCT and one conference abstract reporting an RCT pilot study. A trend towards a reduction in diarrhoea incidence was observed in the probiotic groups. However, mortality associated with probiotic use in some severely and critically ill patients must caution the clinician against its use.---------- Conclusion: Evidence to support probiotic use in the management of ETF diarrhoea in critically ill patients remains unclear. This paper argues that probiotics should not be administered to critically ill patients until further research has been conducted to examine the causal relationship between probiotics and mortality, irrespective of the patient's disease state or projected prophylactic benefit of probiotic administration.

Chemical and physical restraints are frequently used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to control agitated patients and to prevent self-harm and unplanned extubations. Published work relating to the numerous issues of the care and treatment strategies for these patients remains conflicting and unclear. Literature regarding sedation and chemical restraint reveals a trend towards management with lighter sedation, use of sedation assessment tools and sedation protocols. It remains unclear which treatment is best for agitated and delirious patients, and the evidence on the effect of sedation is conflicting. A large portion of the literature on the use of physical restraint is from general hospital wards and residential homes, and not from the ICU environment. The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the existing literature on the use of physical and chemical restraints in the ICU setting. In Part 1 of this two-part paper, the evidence on chemical and physical restraints is explored with specific focus on definition of terms, unplanned extubation, agitation, delirium and the impact of nurse-patient ratios in the ICU on these issues. Part 2 of the paper examines the evidence related to chemical and physical restraints from the perspective of the mechanically ventilated patient.

Summary The care of the mechanically ventilated patient is a fundamental component of a nurse's clinical practice in the intensive care unit (ICU). Published work relating to the numerous nursing issues of the care of the mechanically ventilated patient in the ICU is growing significantly, yet is fragmentary by nature. The purpose of this paper is to provide a single comprehensive examination of the evidence related to the care of the mechanically ventilated patient. In part one of this two-part paper, the evidence on nursing care of the mechanically ventilated patient was explored with specific focus on patient safety: particularly patient and equipment assessment. This article, part two, examines the evidence related to the mechanically ventilated patient's comfort : patient position, hygiene, management of stressors (such as communication, sleep disturbance and isolation), pain management and sedation.

This Husserlian phenomenological study explored the lived experience of eight full-time agency nurses working in the environment of intensive care in London, United Kingdom. In-depth interviews were used to ascertain the participants' experiences of full-time agency nursing in intensive care. Colaizzi's [Colaizzi P. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Vale R, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. London: Oxford University Press; 1978, p. 48-71] method of data analysis was utilised. Thematic analysis identified three cluster themes: the shared experience of lacking confidence; the shared experience of deskilling; and the shared experience of feelings of isolation. The theme of the shared experience of lacking confidence identified the importance of support and understanding of agency nurses' needs in the ICU. The theme of the shared experience of deskilling illuminated participants concern at not having the opportunity to care for patients of higher acuity. The theme of the shared experience of feelings of isolation highlighted that often participants did not feel they "belonged to a team". Study findings suggest the need to include: the implementation of protocols within the clinical setting; the provision of performance feedback to agency nurses; and the consideration of ongoing structured professional development and education for ICU agency nurses.

Objective: To standardise the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) team’s approach to weaning paediatric patients from mechanical ventilation. Method: The study employed a time series design over 2 years. A total of 220 patients (pre-intervention n=107 and post-intervention n=113) were studied. Independent variables measured in both the pre- and post-intervention groups included total ventilation time (TVT), weaning duration (WD), and length of stay (LOS), as well as quality indicators (weaning failure and reintubation rates). Results: The pre-intervention analysis demonstrated an existing fluctuation between outcome variables. When outcome indicators were compared between the pre- and post-intervention groups, both TVT and LOS were longer post-intervention (median difference: TVT −15.8 hours, P