Search

Abstract: Pollinator declines have motivated efforts to plant nectar and host plants for butterflies and other pollinators, but whether gardens promote pollinator conservation requires further investigation. We established garden plots to determine whether plant type (native vs. exotic) and weed maintenance (low or high) influence adult butterfly abundance and species richness, and the abundance and survival of immature stages of four species (monarch, queen, black swallowtail, and gulf fritillary). To assess how predator activity and mortality of immature stages might differ inside gardens compared to other suitable habitat patches, we compared caterpillar survival on sentinel host plants placed within and outside of plots. The abundance and species richness of adult butterflies (all taxa) increased with the number of flowering plants per plot, but did not depend on plant type or weeding treatment. Exotic plots had greater adult monarch and gulf fritillary abundances, greater monarch and queen egg counts, and lower black swallowtail caterpillar counts relative to native plots. The survival of immature stages (egg to instar 5) ranged from 2 to 13% and was similar across plots, except for gulf fritillary larvae, which had higher survival in exotic plots. Monarch caterpillar mortality risk was higher on sentinel plants placed inside plots, relative to those outside of plots. This study suggests that garden plots attracted a diversity of adult butterflies and supported the reproduction of focal species. Given lower immature monarch survival within versus outside of plots, further work is needed to examine natural enemy pressure within pollinator gardens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent declines in the size of overwintering colonies of monarch butterflies ( Danaus plexippus) in eastern North America have stimulated calls for greater conservation efforts of the migratory phenomenon. Conservation decisions, however, should be guided by sound science, and the migratory phase of this population is the least-studied part of its life cycle., Data from large-scale citizen science programs can help address this knowledge gap. For over 20 years, volunteers have been tagging migrating monarchs with numbered stickers from MonarchWatch (), who oversees the management of tagging and recovery records. These data have the potential to vastly improve scientific understanding of the migratory phase (such as identifying spatial and temporal trends in mortality) and help target conservation efforts, but this potential has not yet been fully realised, based on a review of published studies in the last 20 years., Since citizen science programs are often understaffed and operate on minimal budgets, data analysis may not be a high priority for project staff. To stimulate scientific investigations using tagging data, there are alternative solutions that could be implemented including making data publicly available or soliciting assistance from external scientists. Such efforts would not only benefit research into monarch biology, but would lend scientific credibility to tagging activities., Tagging monarchs is a popular activity with clear educational value. In my opinion these data could be, however, better utilised to improve the conservation of the migratory phenomenon itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

. 1. The status of the eastern North American monarch butterfly population is a highly sensitive issue, given that winter and breeding habitats are being lost at an alarming rate each year, and because of this, most believe the population to be declining, although there has been little empirical data to support this idea. In a recent forum article of this journal, Brower et al. (2011) report a statistically significant decline in winter colony size over a 17-year period and suggest that this is the first sign of impending collapse. 2. I conducted an analysis of numbers of migrating monarchs from two fall monitoring stations in the United States (Cape May, NJ and Peninsula Point, MI), which span 15 and 19 years, respectively, and at both locations there was no significant linear trend in average monarch numbers counted over time, which is in marked contrast to the conclusion drawn by Brower et al. (2011). 3. Although I identify several possible reasons for the discrepancy between the fall census counts and size of the overwintering areas, these differing patterns argue for a more balanced perspective regarding the status of this population, and certainly for considering more than one phase of the life cycle. Even though it is difficult to imagine how monarchs will fare in the future with so many threats to their population, the data presented here suggest that the population remains stable for now, probably because of the high fecundity of the species and its ability to rebound from small winter numbers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]