Search

The new simplified loleomycin (BLM) mimic ligands L 1 and L 2 (=a carbamide-attached L i ) have been synthesized to study pH-dependent coordination chemistry. Comparison of the protonation constants for L 1 (9.8, 7.3, and 5.6 at 25 o C, I=0.2 (NaClO 4 )) and L 2 (7.8, 6.9, and 3.7) reveals the significance of the carbamide group which is applied to the primary function of the corresponding carbamide of the β-aminoalanine portion in BLM.

Both the fac- and mer-isomers of tricyano[bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine = 2-DPA]ferrate(II) were isolated and their spectroscopic properties compared. The fac-isomer was converted to the corresponding iron(III) complex under acidic conditions. Oxidation of the ferrate(II) complexes with ammonium peroxodisulfate yielded the mer-isomer of the dehydrogenated ferrate(II) compound, but only the metal-oxidized iron(III) complex for the fac-isomer was produced under neutral or basic conditions. Electrochemical measurements confirmed this difference in the oxidation behavior, in which the nature of the coordination governs the ease of oxidative dehydrogenation.

Two new bleomycin analogues, 2-[((2-(4-imidazolyl)ethyl)amino)carbonyl]-6-[((2-amino-2-methylpropyl)amino)methyl]pyridine = L(3)() and 2-[((2-(4-imidazolyl)ethyl)amino)carbonyl]-6-[((2-amino-1,1,2-trimethylpropyl)amino)methyl]pyridine = L(4)(), were synthesized in order to create air-stable ligands of their Cu(I) (and Fe(II)) complexes. The protonation constants (log K(n)()) of the ligands at 25 degrees C and I = 0.1 M NaNO(3) were 9.9, 6.9, and 5.2 for L(3)() and 10.0, 6.7, and 3.9 for L(4)(). The complexation of the triprotonated L(3)() and L(4)() with Cu(II) started at pH5 to yield 4-coordinate [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L).H(+)](2+) complexes, 4 and 6, respectively, followed by formation of square-pyramidal [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L)](+) complexes, 5 and 7, with pK(a) values of 5.6 for 5 and 5.9 for 7. The complexation constants, log K(Cu)()II(H)()-1(L), were 8.9 for [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L(3))](+), 5, and 8.6 for [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L(4))](+), 7, respectively. The structures of [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L(3))]ClO(4) (5.ClO(4)) and [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L(4))]BF(4) (7.BF(4)) were determined by X-ray crystallography. Crystal data for 5.ClO(4): monoclinic, space group P2(1)/n (No. 14), a = 13.978(6) Å, b = 8.103(3) Å, c = 18.037(5) Å, beta = 98.61(3) degrees, V = 2019(1) Å(3), Z = 4, R = 0.053, and R(w) = 0.044 for 2996 [I3sigma(I)] reflections. Crystal data for 7.BF(4): monoclinic, space group P2(1)/n (No. 14), a = 16.092 (4) Å, b = 7.974(4) Å, c = 16.819(2) Å, beta = 99.64(1) degrees, V = 2127(1) Å(3), Z = 4, R = 0.040, and R(w) = 0.025 for 1633 [I4sigma(I)] reflections. The coordination geometry around the copper was a distorted square-pyramid in 5, while that of 7 was the intermediate between a trigonal-bipyramid and a square-pyramid. The distortion is influenced strongly by the number of the methyl group. The EPR spectral data for both copper(II) complexes were consistent with the retention of the solid-state structure in frozen DMF/MeOH (1:1) solution at 77 K. The visible absorption spectra of 10% DMF/aqueous solutions (pH 9.5) of 5 and 7 at I = 0.1 M NaNO(3) showed absorption maxima at 646 nm with a shoulder at ca. 900 nm for 5 and at 658 and 888 nm for 7. The red-shift of 7 by ca. 12 nm relative to 5 reflects the distortion toward the trigonal-bipyramidal geometry of 7 in solution. Both complexes displayed irreversible redox behavior in DMF at I = 0.1 M tetra(n-butyl)ammonium tetrafluoroborate. The anodic and cathodic peak potentials obtained by cyclic voltammetry for 5 and 7 were -0.14 and -0.76 V for 5 and -0.17 and -0.80 for 7 vs Ag/AgCl. The cathodic potentials of copper(II) complexes were shifted toward the anodic direction by ca. 20-60 mV compared to the nonsubstituted 5-coordinate, [Cu(II)(H(-)(1)L(1))](+) complex, 16 (-0.82 V vs Ag/AgCl). The Cu(I) complexes (9and 10) are air-oxidized to the corresponding Cu(II) complexes, 5 and 7, respectively.