Search

The rate of reduction of hexavalent 243Am due to self-radiolysis was measured across a range of total americium and nitric acid concentrations. These so-called autoreduction rates exhibited zero-order kinetics with respect to the concentration of hexavalent americium, and pseudo-first-order kinetics with respect to the total concentration of americium. However, the rate constants did vary with nitric acid concentration, resulting in values of 0.0048 ± 0.0003, 0.0075 ± 0.0005, and 0.0054 ± 0.0003 h-1 for 1.0, 3.0, and 6.5 M HNO3, respectively. This indicates that reduction is due to reaction of hexavalent americium with the radiolysis products of total americium decay. The concentration changes of Am(III), Am(V), and Am(VI) were determined by UV-vis spectroscopy. The Am(III) molar extinction coefficients are known; however, the unknown values for the Am(V) and Am(VI) absorbances across the studied range of nitric acid concentrations were determined by sensitivity analysis in which a mass balance with the known total americium concentration was obtained. The new extinction coefficients and reduction rate constants have been tabulated here. Multiscale radiation chemical modeling using a reaction set with both known and optimized rate coefficients was employed to achieve excellent agreement with the experimental results, and indicates that radiolytically produced nitrous acid from nitric acid radiolysis and hydrogen peroxide from water radiolysis are the important reducing agents. Since these species also react with each other, modeling indicated that the highest concentrations of these species available for Am(VI) reduction occurred at 3.0 M HNO3. This is in agreement with the empirical finding that the highest rate constant for autoreduction occurred at the intermediate acid concentration.

The recent development of facile methods to oxidize trivalent americium to its higher valence states holds promise for the discovery of new chemistries and critical insight into the behavior of the 5f electrons. However, progress in understanding high-valent americium chemistry has been hampered by americium's inherent ionizing radiation field and its concomitant effects on americium redox chemistry. Any attempt to understand high-valent americium reduction and/or disproportionation must account for the effects of these radiolytic processes. Therefore, we present a complete, quantitative, mechanistic description of the radiation-induced redox chemistry of the americyl oxidation states in aerated, aqueous nitric acid, as a function of radiation quality (type and energy) and solution composition using multiscale modeling calculations supported by experiment. The reduction of Am(VI) to Am(V) was found to be most sensitive to the effects of ionizing radiation, undergoing rapid reductions with the steady-state products of aqueous HNO3 radiolysis, i.e., HNO2, H2O2, and HO2•, which dictated its practical lifetime under acidic conditions. In contrast, Am(V) is only susceptible to radiolytic oxidation, mainly through its reactions with NO3•, and is notably radiation-resistant with respect to direct one-electron reduction to produce Am(IV). Our multiscale modeling calculations predict that the lifetime of Am(V) is dictated by its rate of disproportionation, 2AmO2+ + 4Haq+ → AmO22+ + Am4+ + 2H2O, with a fourth-order dependence on [Haq+] in agreement with previous experimental findings, giving an optimized rate coefficient of k = 2.27 × 10-6 M-5 s-1. This disproportionation initially produces Am(IV) and Am(VI) species, but the lack of any spectroscopic evidence in our study for Am(IV) suggests that solvent reduction of this cation occurs rapidly. The ultimate product of all the Am(VI)/Am(V) irradiations is Am(III), which shows great stability in an irradiation field.

The complex Ru(II)(NH(3))(2)(o-benzoquinonediimine)Cl(2) undergoes a reversible apparent acid/base reaction, although it has no obvious basic lone pairs. The reaction is a proton-assisted disproportionation yielding an oxidant ([Ru(III)(NH(3))(2)(o-benzoquinonediimine)Cl(2)](+)) and a reductant ([Ru(III)(NH(3))(2)(o-phenylenediamine)Cl(2)](+)). These species were characterized by electrochemistry, ultraviolet-visible light (UV-vis), vibrational (infrared (IR) and Raman), mass and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and X-ray structural analysis. The reaction is shown to be downhill from an isodesmic calculation. Three different isosbestic interconversions of the parent and product species are demonstrated. The electronic structures of these species were analyzed, and their optical spectra assigned, using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT. This disproportionation of a noninnocent ligand complex may be relevant to the application of noninnocent ligands in organometallic catalysis and in the biological milieu.

A collector-generator (C-G) technique has been applied to determine the Faradaic efficiencies for electrocatalytic O2 production by the homogeneous water oxidation catalysts Ru(bda)(isoq)2 (1; bda = 2,2'-bipyridine and isoq = isoquinoline) and [Ru(tpy)(bpz)(OH2)](2+) (2; tpy = 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine and bpz = 2,2'-bipyrazine). This technique uses a custom-fabricated cell consisting of two fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) working electrodes separated by 1 mm with the conductive sides facing each other. With a catalyst in solution, water oxidation occurs at one FTO electrode under a sufficient bias to drive O2 formation by the catalyst; the O2 formed then diffuses to the second FTO electrode poised at a potential sufficiently negative to drive O2 reduction. A comparison of the current versus time response at each electrode enables determination of the Faradaic efficiency for O2 production with high concentrations of supporting electrolyte important for avoiding capacitance effects between the electrodes. The C-G technique was applied to electrocatalytic water oxidation by 1 in the presence of the electron-transfer mediator Ru(bpy)3(2+) in both unbuffered aqueous solutions and with the added buffer bases HCO3(-), HPO4(2-), imidazole, 1-methylimidazole, and 4-methoxypyridine. HCO3(-) and HPO4(2-) facilitate water oxidation by atom-proton transfer (APT), which gave Faradaic yields of 100%. With imidazole as the buffer base, coordination to the catalyst inhibited water oxidation. 1-Methylimidazole and 4-methoxypyridine gave O2 yields of 55% and 76%, respectively, with the lower Faradaic efficiencies possibly due to competitive C-H oxidation of the bases. O2 evolution by catalyst 2 was evaluated at pH 12 with 0.1 M PO4(3-) and at pH 7 in a 0.1 M H2PO4(-)/HPO4(2-) buffer. At pH 12, at an applied potential of 0.8 V vs SCE, water oxidation by the Ru(IV)(O)(2+) form of the catalyst gave O2 in 73% yield. In a pH 7 solution, water oxidation at 1.4 V vs SCE, which is dominated by Ru(V)(O)(3+), gave O2 with an efficiency of 100%. The lower efficiency for Ru(IV)(O)(2+) at pH 12 may be due to competitive oxidation of a polypyridyl ligand.

The syntheses and properties are reported for five Ru(acac)2(R-bqdi) species where acac is acetylacetonate, and R-bqdi is the non-innocent ligand ortho-benzoquinonediimine substituted with R = H (1), 4,5-dimethyl (2), 4-Cl (3), or 4-NO2 (4), and N,N''-dimethylsulfonyl (5). Their identities and purities were confirmed by NMR, mass spectra, IR and analytical data. The large degree of metal-to-ligand pi-back-donation was analyzed by spectroscopic (UV/visible, IR, Raman) and electrochemical data, supported by molecular orbital composition computations using density functional theory (DFT), with the polarizable continuum model (PCM) to mimic the presence of solvent, and prediction of electronic spectra using time-dependent DFT methods. Extended charge decomposition analysis (ECDA) and natural population analysis (NPA) both produced a detailed picture of the bonding between the non-innocent bqdi ligand and the metal center, allowing correlations to be drawn between the nature of the R substituents and the quantitative extent of pi-back-donation and sigma-forward donation. In conclusion, the issue of whether these species are best regarded as Ru(II)(quinonediimine) or coupled Ru(III)(semiquinonediiminate) species is discussed.