Search

Introduction: Paediatric trauma is a leading cause of death, with correlations between trauma outcomes and geographical locations. Certain rural regions of Norway face a higher risk of trauma-related fatalities compared to the nationwide population. Among adults, the risk of both fatal and non-fatal injuries rises with increased rurality. The study aimed to investigate whether there is an increased risk of fatal and non-fatal injuries for children in rural areas across the entire country, as well as any changes over two decades., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of fatal and non-fatal paediatric injuries by accessing two national registries for all trauma-related patients under the age of 18. All cases were stratified into six groups according to level of centrality based on a national index used as a proxy for rurality. For inter-group comparison, urban-rural disparities were evaluated using Pearson`s Chi-square test, linear regression, and relative risk (RR)., Result: 1,059 paediatric deaths were included in the study period from 2002 to 2021. The mortality rate increased linearly with increased rurality (r = 0.985, p < .001). The overall mortality risk was 2.4 times higher in the most rural group compared to the most urban (RR = 2.37, 95 %CI 1.78 - 3.14, p < .001). Most deaths occurred pre-hospital (73 %), the total number of fatalities was highest in the age group 16 to 17 (42 %), and transport-related injury (32 %) was the most common cause of death. The relative risk of non-fatal injury was significantly higher for all centrality groups compared to most urban, and the highest rate was seen in sub-rural areas (RR = 1.39, 95 %CI 1.37 - 1.42, p < .001)., Conclusion: The mortality rate increased linearly across all levels of centrality, and the relative risk was 2.4 times higher in the most rural population compared to the most urban population. To effectively target primary prevention and enhance trauma care for paediatric patients in rural areas, a deeper epidemiological understanding and more comprehensive studies are essential., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors state that they have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In line with international trends, initial treatment of trauma patients has changed substantially over the last two decades. Although trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children globally, in-hospital pediatric trauma related mortality is expected to be low in a mature trauma system. To evaluate the performance of a major Scandinavian trauma center we assessed treatment strategies and outcomes in all pediatric trauma patients over a 16-year period., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients under the age of 18 years admitted to a single institution from 1st of January 2003 to 31st of December 2018. Outcomes for two time periods were compared, 2003-2009 (Period 1; P1) and 2010-2018 (Period 2; P2). Deaths were further analyzed for preventability by the institutional trauma Mortality and Morbidity panel., Results: The study cohort consisted of 3939 patients. A total of 57 patients died resulting in a crude mortality of 1.4%, nearly one quarter of the study cohort (22.6%) was severely injured (Injury Severity Score > 15) and mortality in this group decreased from 9.7% in P1 to 4.1% in P2 (p<0.001). The main cause of death was brain injury in both periods, and 55 of 57 deaths were deemed non-preventable. The rate of emergency surgical procedures performed in the emergency department (ED) decreased during the study period. None of the 11 ED thoracotomies in non-survivors were performed after 2013., Conclusion: A dedicated multidisciplinary trauma service with ongoing quality improvement efforts secured a low in-hospital mortality among severely injured children and a decrease in futile care. Deaths were shown to be almost exclusively non-preventable, pointing to the necessity of prioritizing prevention strategies to further decrease pediatric trauma related mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: A rural gradient in trauma mortality disfavoring remote inhabitants is well known. Previous studies have shown higher risk of traumatic deaths in rural areas in Norway, combined with a paradoxically decreased prevalence of non-fatal injuries. We investigated the risk of fatal and severe non-fatal injuries among all adults in Norway during 2002-2016., Methods: All traumatic injuries and deaths among persons with a residential address in Norway from 2002-2016 were included. Data were collected from the Norwegian National Cause of Death Registry and the Norwegian Patient Registry. All cases were stratified into six groups of centrality based on Statistics Norway's classification system, from most urban (group one) to least urban/most rural (group six). Mortality and injury rates were calculated per 100,000 inhabitants per year., Results: The mortality rate differed significantly among the centrality groups (p<0.05). The rate was 64.2 per 100,000 inhabitants/year in the most urban group and 78.6 per 100,000 inhabitants/year in the most rural group. The lowest mortality rate was found in centrality group 2 (57.9 per 100,000 inhabitants/year). For centrality group 6 versus group 2, the risk of death was increased (relative risk, 1.36; 95%CI: 1.11-1.66; p<0.01). The most common causes of death were transport injury, self-harm, falls, and other external causes. The steepest urban-rural gradient was seen for transport injuries, with a relative risk of 3.32 (95%CI: 1.81-6.10; p<0.001) for group 6 compared with group 1. There was a significantly increasing risk for severe non-fatal injuries from urban to rural areas. Group 2 had the lowest risk for non-fatal injuries (1531 per 100,000 inhabitants/year) and group 6 the highest (1803 per 100,000 inhabitants/year). The risk for non-fatal injuries increased with increasing rurality, with a relative risk of 1.07 (95%CI: 1.02-1.11; p<0.01) for group 6 versus group 1., Conclusions: Fatal and non-fatal injury risks increased in parallel with increasing rurality. The lowest risk was in the second most urban region, followed by the most urban (capital) region, yielding a J-shaped risk curve. Transport injuries had the steepest urban-rural gradient., Competing Interests: Declarations of interest All authors state that they have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Geriatric patients have a high risk of poor outcomes after trauma and is a rapid-increasing group within the trauma population. Given the need to ensure that the trauma system is targeted, efficient, accessible, safe and responsive to all age groups the aim of the present study was to explore the epidemiology and characteristics of the Norwegian geriatric trauma population and assess differences between age groups within a national trauma system., Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis is based on data from the Norwegian Trauma Registry (2015-2018). Injury severity was scaled using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). Trauma patients 16 years or older with NISS ≥9 were included, dichotomized into age groups 16-64 years (Group 1, G1) and ≥65 years (Group 2, G2). The groups were compared with respect to differences in demographics, injury characteristics, management and outcome. Descriptive statistics and relevant parametric and non-parametric tests were used., Results: Geriatric patients proved to be at risk of sustaining severe injuries. Low-energy falls predominated in G2, and the AIS body regions 'Head' and 'Pelvis and lower extremities' were most frequently injured. Crude 30-day mortality was higher in G2 compared to G1 (G1: 2.9 vs. G2: 13.6%, P<0.01) and the trauma team activation (TTA) rate was lower (G1: 90 vs. G2: 73%, P<0.01). A lower proportion of geriatric patients were treated by a physician prehospitally (G1: 30 vs. G2: 18%, [NISS 15-24], P<0.01) and transported by air-ambulance (G1: 24 vs. G2: 14%, [NISS 15-24], P<0.01). Median time from alarm to hospital admission was longer for geriatric patients (G1: 71 vs. G2: 78 min [NISS 15-24], P<0.01), except for the most severely injured patients (NISS≥25)., Conclusion: In this nationwide study comparing adult and geriatric trauma patients, geriatric patients were found to have a higher mortality, receive less frequently advanced prehospital treatment and transportation, and a lower TTA rate. This is surprising in the setting of a Nordic country with free access to publicly funded emergency services, a nationally implemented trauma system with requirements to pre- and in-hospital services and a national trauma registry with high individual level coverage from all trauma-receiving hospitals. Further exploration and a deeper understanding of these differences is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)