Search

Background This study aimed at analysing risk factors for development of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) in tibial plateau fractures, and to construct a nomogram predicting ACS-risk. Patients and Methods 243 patients (102 males; mean age: 50.7 [range: 18-85] years) with 253 tibial plateau fractures treated between 2010 and 2019 at a level-1 trauma centre were retrospectively included. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (OR) were performed to assess variables predicting ACS. Based on the multivariate model, ROC curve, Youden index, and nomogram were constructed. Results ACS developed in 23 patients (9.1%), with risk factors being male gender (OR: 10.606; p<0.001), BMI (OR: 1.084; p = 0.048), polytrauma (OR: 4.085; p = 0.003), and Schatzker type IV-VI fractures (OR: 6.325; p = 0.004). Age, ASA score, diabetes, renal insufficiency, hypertension, smoking or open fracture were not significantly associated with ACS-risk (all p>0.05). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 7.392; p = 0.002), and Schatzker type IV-VI fractures (OR: 5.533; p = 0.009) remained independent negative ACS-predictors, irrespective of polytrauma (p = 0.081), or BMI (p = 0.194). Area under the ROC curve was 0.840. Youden index revealed a cut-off value of ≥ 18%, upon which patients are at extremely high risk for ACS. Conclusions Particular attention should be paid to male patients with high-energy fractures of the tibial plateau towards any signs of ACS of the affected extremity to initiate early treatment. The compiled nomogram, consisting of four easily quantifiable clinical variables, may be used in clinical practice to individually predict ACS risk. Any risk score ≥ 18% should prompt critical monitoring towards ACS, or even prophylactic fasciotomy during primary surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflicts of interest related to the present manuscript to declare., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) following total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA) have become more common over the years. The aim of the present study was to assess morbidity and mortality following surgery for PPF of hip and knee., Patients and Methods: Altogether, 124 patients (mean age: 77 years; 77.4% female) with PPF of the hip (n=97) and knee (n=27), treated between 2005 and 2017 at a level-1 trauma centre, were retrospectively included. In order to assess risk factors for postoperative morbidity, Fine and Gray's model was used to compensate for death as the competing event. Risk factors for mortality were estimated with uni- and multivariate Cox-regression models., Results: Vancouver B2 fractures were most common (n=39; 42.4%), followed by B1 fractures (n=23; 25.0%). Lewis-Rorabeck Type I fractures (n=14; 51.9%) were most frequent in PPF of the knee. Overall complication rates were 44.0% and 29.9% for PPF of the knee and hip, respectively, with three patients having both early and late complications, 25 patients developing early complications and 19 patients undergoing surgery for implant-related, late complications. In the multivariate Fine and Gray model, advanced patient age (HR: 0.956; 95%CI: 0.922-0.991; p=0.014) and prosthesis exchange (vs. ORIF; HR: 0.242, 95%CI: 0.068-0.859; p=0.028) were associated with lower risk of implant-related complications, irrespective of gender (p=0.450) and a surgical delay > 2 days (p=0.411). One- and 5-year overall survival-rates were 97.9% and 93.1%, respectively. Gender, type of fixation (ORIF vs. prosthesis exchange), surgical delay > 2 days, BMI and age at surgery were neither in the univariate, nor multivariate Cox-regression model associated with an increased mortality rate., Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity caused by implant-related complications is higher in younger patients and those receiving ORIF. With the statistical approach used, potential underestimation of actual complication rates may have been avoided, taking into account death as the competing event. Despite being based on a retrospective, heterogenous patient collective treated at a level-1 trauma centre, our results indicate that careful planning of the surgical procedure beyond 2 days, taking into consideration both patient's age and activity level, has no negative effect on patient outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any conflicts of interest related to the present manuscript to declare., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The utilisation and consequences of standardised operative procedures may importantly differ between different healthcare systems. This is the first investigation comparing the treatment and outcome of femoral shaft fractures stabilised with an identical implant between trauma centres in 2 continents (Europe, EU and South Africa, SA)., Methods: Following standardised introduction of the technique, the prospective, observational multicentre study enrolled 175 patients who underwent intramedullary fracture fixation using the antegrade femoral nail (AFN) for femoral shaft fractures. Eleven EU hospitals recruited 86 patients and 1 SA centre 89 patients in the study period. Comparison of epidemiologic data, operative characteristics as well as subjective (e.g., pain, SF-36) and objective (e.g., X-ray, range of motion [ROM]) 3-month and 1-year outcomes were performed (p<0.05)., Results: Compared to EU centres, several significant differences were observed in SA: (1) on average, patients operated on were younger, had less concomitant diseases and had more severe open fractures; (2) operative stabilisation was more often undertaken by young, unsupervised residents, with shorter operating and intraoperative fluoroscopy times; (3) mean hospital stay was shorter, with less recorded complications, but a higher loss to follow-up rate. Non- or malunion rates and subjective outcomes were similar for both groups, with the physical component of the SF-36 at the 1-year follow-up not fully restoring to baseline values., Conclusions: Our investigation demonstrates the importance of several major differences between 2 different regions of the world in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, despite involving only high level trauma centres and using an identical implant. The intercontinental comparison of results from clinical studies should be interpreted very carefully considering the heterogeneity of populations and clinical settings., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)