Search

Introduction There is currently a debate on whether all Vancouver type B2 (V-B2) periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHF) should be revised. Vancouver classification takes into account fracture location, implant stability and bone stock, but it does not distinguish between fracture patterns. The aim of our work was to study the different fracture patterns of V-B2 PPHF and to analyze if there is any pattern that presents lower osteosynthesis failure rates. Material and methods All patients with V-B2 PPHF treated by osteosynthesis between January 2009 and January 2019 were included in the study. Using the Gruen system the proximal femur was divided into 3 zones. The lateral zone (Gruen 1±2±3), medial zone (Gruen 5±6±7), and distal zone (Gruen 4±3±5) were analysed and it was determined whether each of the 3 zones was fractured. Results 56 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 79 years (R 45 - 92). The chosen treatment was: 39 Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 10 Stem revision and 7 nonoperatively treatment. In ORIF group, no implant complications (0/24) were found in patients with a single fractured zone, while 5 implant complications (5/15) were discovered in patients with two or more fractured areas; this difference was significant (p=0.0147). All patients treated by stem revision had a fracture that involved two or more zones. In the nonoperatively group, the fracture pattern did not influence the treatment because of all of them had a very precarious functional and medical situation. Conclusions V-B2 PPHF treated via ORIF affecting only one zone (medial, lateral, or distal) have a lower risk of complication than those affecting two or more zones. We propose a sub-classification of Vancouver B2 type fractures: B2.1 (1 fractured zone) and B2.2 (≥2 fractured zones). Level of evidence Historical cohorts. Level III

INTRODUCTION: The correct choice of surgical approaches in complex tibial plateau fractures is essential to achieve adequate reduction and fixation. Detailed fracture morphology and direction of columns displacement, that we have named the Main Deformity Direction (MDD), may aid in selecting the optimal surgical strategy. In this article we present a new algorithm based on MDD and column concepts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a group of tibial plateau fractures treated according to this algorithm. The secondary aim was to evaluate the incidence of the different MDD in our multicolumnar subgroup. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Excluding isolated lateral one-column fractures, open fractures and patients not treated following this algorithm, 72 patients with tibial plateau fractures surgically treated with open reduction and internal fixation were collected retrospectively, from three trauma centers, from January 2015 to April 2019. Radiological assessment was performed to establish the columns involved and the MDD. Quality and maintenance of reduction and alignment, complications and functional outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Initial fracture analysis was performed in 72 patients (8 one-column, 35 two-column and 29 multicolumnar fractures). In the multicolumnar group, the posteromedial MDD was the most frequent pattern (17 of 29 patients). Four patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up, resulting 68 patients for final outcome analysis (7 one-column, 34 two-column and 27 multicolumnar). The average follow-up was 18 months (range: 6-52). Excellent/good outcomes were obtained in all one-column, 31 of 34 two-column and 25 of 27 multicolumnar fractures. Incomplete reduction was present in three patients. As complications, we had two loss of reduction, one conversion to knee arthroplasty, one nonunion and one deep infection. No patient presented neurological or vascular problems, knee instability or extension deficit. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results have been obtained following the principles of our algorithm. In addition to the anatomical involvement of columns and segments, we believe that identifying the Main Deformity Direction (MDD) provides useful information for decision-making, especially in multicolumnar fractures. The most frequent MDD in our multicolumnar subgroup was the posteromedial MDD, but more than one-third presented a different MDD, requiring different surgical strategies.

Introduction Ankle fractures represent the third most common fracture in elderly patients, after hip and wrist fractures. Distal fibula fractures in this population are closely related to osteoporosis, which renders commonly used methods of internal fixation technically demanding and prone to failure. Currently there is a tendency to fix osteoporotic metaphyseal and epiphyseal fractures with locking plates. However, published accounts about the use of this technology in osteoporotic distal fibula fractures are scarce. In this study we compare the results of two groups of patients who underwent surgery for these types of fracture, one group received locking and the other non-locking screws, both using one-third tubular plates. Methods Sixty-two patients, aged over 64 years, underwent surgery for osteoporotic distal fibula fractures between 2011 and 2014. Forty-five of them were stabilized with a non-locking plate and the remaining 17 with a locking plate fixation. Follow-up was performed at 4, 8, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Results were assessed according to the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score and radiological criteria for consolidation. Results Average time to union and AOFAS scores at 6 and 12 months were similar in both groups, including for the individual categories: function, pain, mobility, and alignment. Only time until partial weight bearing was significantly lower in the locking plate group (4.69 ± 2.63 vs 7.77 ± 4.30, p = 0.03). The most common complications were wound dehiscence and superficial infection (two cases of both). Conclusions Both locking and conventional non-locking plates achieved similar treatment outcomes in this group of osteoporotic patients aged over 64. However, locking plates may offer more benefits in cases that have to take into account immobilization time and concomitant soft-tissue damage.