Search

Aims: Many advocate screw fixation of fractures to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal base, better known as Jones fractures (JF), to facilitate quicker ambulation and return to sport. Maximizing screw parameters based on fifth metatarsal (MT5) anatomy, alongside understanding the anatomic structures compromised by screw insertion, may optimize surgical outcomes. This study aims to (1) correlate the proximity of JF to the peroneus brevis (PB) and plantar fascia (PF) footprints and (2) quantify optimal screw parameters given MT5 anatomy.Materials and Methods: 3D CT-scan reconstructions were made of 21 cadaveric MT5s, followed by meticulous mapping of the PB and PF onto the reconstructions. Based on bone length, shape, narrowest intramedullary canal (IMC) diameter, and surrounding anatomy, two traditional debated screw positions were modeled for each reconstruction: (1) an anatomically positioned screw (AP), predicated on maximizing screw length by following the IMC for as long as possible, and (2) a clinically achievable screw (CA), predicated on maximizing screw length without violating the fifth tarso-metatarsal joint or adjacent cuboid bone. Fixation parameters were calculated for all models.Results: The PB and PF extended into the JF site in 29% and 43%, respectively. AP's did not affect PB and PF footprint but required screw entry through the cuboid and fifth tarso-metatarsal joint in all specimens. CA screw entry sites, avoiding the cuboid and fifth tarso-metatarsal joint, partially compromised the PB and PF insertions in 33% and 62% with a median surface loss of 1.6%%(range 0.2-3.2%) and 0.81%%(range 0.05-1.6%), respectively. Mean AP screw length was 64±3.6mm and thread length 49±4.2mm. Mean CA screw length was 48±5.8mm and thread length 28±6.9mm.Conclusion: This study underscores the challenges associated with surrounding MT5 anatomy as they relate to optimal JF treatment. Both the extent of JF as well as a clinically achievable positioned screw violate the PB and PF footprints - although the degree to which even partial disruption of these footprints has on outcome remains unclear. To minimize damage to surrounding structures, including the PB and PF footprint, while allowing a screw length approximately two thirds of the metatarsal length, the CA screw position is recommended. This position balances the desire to maximize pull out strength while avoiding cortical penetration or inadvertent fracture site distraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Syndesmotic instability, when subtle, is challenging to diagnose and often requires visualization of the syndesmosis during applied stress. The primary aim was to assess normal distal tibiofibular motion in the sagittal plane using dynamic ultrasound under stress conditions. The secondary aim was to evaluate the reliability of dynamic stress ultrasonography., Methods: Twenty-eight participants without history of ankle injury were included. Sagittal fibular translation was generated by applying a manual force to the fibula from anterior to posterior and from posterior to anterior. Distance between the ultrasound probe and the fibula was taken at two predefined points: 1) no force applied and, 2) during maximum force application. Each participant was scanned twice by two independent examiners, and each scan was analysed by two independent examiners. Three participants were scanned a second time by the same examiner who analysed these films twice to assess for intraobserver agreement. Means of exam 1 versus exam 2 were compared using a mixed linear model. Agreement among observers was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) interpreted as 0.4, poor; 0.4 〈 ICC < 0.59, acceptable; 0.6 < ICC < 0.74, good; ICC 〉 0.74, excellent., Results: Fifty-six ankles were included in the study, including 16 (57%) males and 12 (42%) females. Average anterior to posterior fibular sagittal translation was 0.89 ± 0.6 mm and posterior to anterior fibular sagittal translation was 0.49 ± 1.1 mm. Anterior to posterior translation means of exam 1 versus exam 2 showed no significant differences, means of 0.81 mm [0.7-0.9] versus 0.77 mm [0.7-1.0], and posterior to anterior means [95% CI] of 0.42 mm [0.3-0.5] versus 0.44 mm [0.2-0.6] (p-values 0.416 and 0.758, respectively). Excellent Inter- and intraobserver agreement was found for all measurements taken., Conclusion: Dynamic ultrasound allows one to effectively and readily evaluate sagittal translation of the distal tibiofibular joint. It is able to afford bilateral comparisons, which becomes critical as the amount of syndesmotic instability approaches greater degrees of subtlety., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. DiGiovanni reports non-financial support from FAI, FAO, Eur J FAS outside the submitted work. Dr. Guss reports other support from Extremity Medical, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)