Search

Background: Since all patients with a scaphoid nonunion are generally treated surgically to prevent progressive osteoarthritis, it is important to set postoperative expectations regarding physical functioning and pain. Previous study mainly focus on postoperative scaphoid union and physician-based outcomes. Therefore we aim to report the change from preoperative to postoperative patient-reported outcomes to inform patients with a scaphoid nonunion about their postoperative expectations., Material and Methods: Data were prospectively collected as part of usual care at the Xpert Clinic in the Netherlands. Adult patients who underwent scaphoid nonunion surgery minimally 3 months after a scaphoid fracture, were eligible for inclusion. Only patients with complete preoperative and postoperative questionnaires regarding our primary outcome (Patient Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation (PRWHE) were included. As secondary outcomes, we assessed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain and hand function, range of motion of the injured wrist measured by a hand therapist, and patient satisfaction with questionnaires., Results: We included 118 patients with complete preoperative and postoperative (11 - 92 months) PRWHE questionnaires. The median PRWHE score improved significantly from 47 [IQR 27 - 62]) preoperative to 11 [IQR 5 - 23] postoperative (p<0.001). Postoperative improvement in pain and physical functioning was also observed in the PWRHE subdomains pain and disability separately (p<0.001), VAS pain, and VAS function (p<0.001). There was no difference between preoperative and postoperative range of motion of the injured wrist. Satisfaction with the hand improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative (p<0.001). Good or excellent satisfaction with the treatment result was reported by 69% of the patients and 86% would undergo the treatment again., Conclusions: Patients can expect an improvement in physical functioning and pain after scaphoid nonunion surgery. Most patients are satisfied with the treatment result., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The institution of one or more of the authors (AC) has received funding from ZonMw, a Dutch organization for health research and care innovation, and co-funding from CZ, a Dutch health insurance company., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Both-bone forearm fractures in children frequently result in a limitation of pronation/supination, which hinders daily activities. The purpose of this prospective multicentre study was to investigate which clinical factors are related to the limitation of pronation/supination in children with a both-bone forearm fracture., Methods: In four Dutch hospitals, consecutive children (<16 years) who sustained a both-bone forearm fracture were included. Children were followed up for 6-9 months and data from questionnaires, physical examination and X-rays were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between limitation of pronation/supination (≥20°) and several clinical factors., Results: A group of 410 children with both-bone forearm fractures were included, of which 10 children missed the final examination (follow-up rate of 97.6%). We found that a re-fracture (odds ratio (OR) 11.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2; 118.5), a fracture in the diaphysis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4; 7.9) and less physiotherapy during follow-up (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82; 0.98) were independently associated with a limitation of pronation/supination of 20° or more., Conclusions: These findings imply that a re-fracture and a diaphyseal located fracture were associated independently of each other with a limitation of pronation/supination in children with a both-bone forearm fracture. Furthermore, in children with severe limitation extensive physiotherapy is associated with better functional outcome., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm are generally reduced and stabilised by an above-elbow cast (AEC) with or without additional pinning. The purpose of this study was to find out if re-displacement of a reduced stable metaphyseal both-bone fracture of the distal forearm in a child could be prevented by stabilisation with Kirschner wires., Methods: Consecutive children aged <16 years with a displaced metaphyseal both-bone fracture of the distal forearm (n = 128) that was stable after reduction were randomised to AEC with or without percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires. The primary outcome was re-displacement of the fracture., Results: A total of 67 children were allocated to fracture reduction and AEC and 61 to reduction of the fracture, fixation with Kirschner wires and AEC. The follow-up rate was 96% with a mean follow-up of 7.1 months. Fractures treated with additional pinning showed less re-displacement (8% vs. 45%), less limitation of pronation and supination (mean limitation 6.9 (± 9.4)° vs. 14.3 (± 13.6)°) but more complications (14 vs. 1)., Conclusions: Pinning of apparent stable both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children might reduce fracture re-displacement. The frequently seen complications of pinning might be reduced by a proper surgical technique., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children are often treated with an above-elbow cast (AEC). Treatment with a below-elbow cast (BEC) could give more comfort, but might lead to fracture displacement reducing pronation and supination. Because this has not been systematically investigated, we set up a randomised multicentre study. The purpose of this study was to find out whether BEC causes equal limitation of pronation and supination but with higher comfort level, compared with AEC., Patients and Methods: In four hospitals, consecutive children aged<16 (mean 7.1) years with a minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fracture of the distal forearm were randomised to 4 weeks BEC (n=35) or 4 weeks AEC (n=31). Primary outcome was limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma. The secondary outcomes were cast comfort, limitation of flexion/extension of wrist/elbow, complications, cosmetics, complaints, and radiological assessment., Results: A group of 35 children received BEC and 31 children received AEC. All children attended for the final examination at a mean follow-up of 7.0 months (range 5.0-11.6 months). Limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma showed no significant difference between the two groups [4.4° (± 5.8) for BEC and 5.8° (± 9.8) for AEC]. Children treated with BEC had significantly higher cast comfort on a visual analogue scale [5.6 (± 2.7) vs. 8.4 (± 1.4)] and needed significantly less help with dressing (8.2 days vs. 15.1 days). Six complications occurred in the BEC group and 14 in the AEC group. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: Children with minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm should be treated with a below-elbow cast., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)