Search

Abstract: One of the particularities of information encoded as DNA strands is that a string u contains basically the same information as its Watson–Crick complement, denoted here as . Thus, any expression consisting of repetitions of u and can be considered in some sense periodic. In this paper, we give a generalization of Lyndon and Schützenberger’s classical result about equations of the form , to cases where both sides involve repetitions of words as well as their complements. Our main results show that, for such extended equations, if , then all three words involved can be expressed in terms of a common word t and its complement . Moreover, if , then is an optimal bound. These results are established based on a complete characterization of all possible overlaps between two expressions that involve only some word u and its complement , which is also obtained in this paper. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper studies nested simulation and nested trace semantics over the language BCCSP, a basic formalism to express finite process behaviour. It is shown that none of these semantics affords finite (in)equational axiomatizations over BCCSP. In particular, for each of the nested semantics studied in this paper, the collection of sound, closed (in)equations over a singleton action set is not finitely based. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper introduces a novel (bi)simulation-based faster-than preorder which relates asynchronous processes, where the relative speeds of system components are indeterminate, with respect to their worst-case timing behavior. The study is conducted for a conservative extension of the process algebra CCS, called TACS, which permits the specification of upper time bounds on action occurrences. TACS complements work in plain process algebras which compares asynchronous processes with respect to their functional reactive behavior only, and in timed process algebras which focus on analyzing synchronous processes. The most unusual contribution is in showing that the proposed faster-than preorder coincides with several other preorders, two of which consider the absolute times at which actions occur in system runs. The paper also develops the semantic theory of TACS by studying congruence properties, equational laws, and abstractions from internal actions. Two examples, one dealing with mail delivery and one relating two implementations of a simple storage system, testify to the practical utility of the new theory. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Permutominoes are polyominoes defined by suitable pairs of permutations. In this paper we provide a formula to count the number of convex permutominoes of given perimeter. To this aim we define the transform of a generic pair of permutations, we characterize the transform of any pair defining a convex permutomino, and we solve the counting problem in the transformed space. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This paper compares the expressiveness of different fragments of ambient calculi via leader election problems. We consider Mobile Ambients (MA), Safe Ambients (SA) and the Push and Pull Ambient Calculus (PAC). Cardelli and Gordon encoded the asynchronous π-calculus into MA. Zimmer has shown that the synchronous π-calculus without choice can be encoded in pure (no communication) SA. We show that pure MA without restriction has symmetric electoral systems, that is, it is possible to solve the problem of electing a leader in a symmetric network. By the work of Palamidessi, this implies that this fragment of MA is not encodable (under certain conditions) in the π-calculus with separate choice. Moreover, we use the same technique to show that fragments of SA and PAC are not encodable (under certain conditions) in the π-calculus with separate choice. We also show that particular fragments of ambient calculi do not admit a solution to leader election problems, in the same way as the π-calculus with separate choice. This yields a fine-grained hierarchy within ambient calculi. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Cryptographic protocols are small programs which involve a high level of concurrency and which are difficult to analyze by hand. The most successful methods to verify such protocols are based on rewriting techniques and automated deduction in order to implement or mimic the process calculus describing the execution of a protocol. We are interested in the intruder deduction problem, that is vulnerability to passive attacks in presence of equational theories which model the protocol specification and properties of the cryptographic operators. In the present paper, we consider the case where the encryption distributes over the operator of an Abelian group or over an exclusive-or operator. We prove decidability of the intruder deduction problem in both cases. We obtain a PTIME decision procedure in a restricted case, the so-called binary case. These decision procedures are based on a careful analysis of the proof system modeling the deductive power of the intruder, taking into account the algebraic properties of the equational theories under consideration. The analysis of the deduction rules interacting with the equational theory relies on the manipulation of -modules in the general case, and on results from prefix rewriting in the binary case. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Term algebras can model recursive data structures which are widely used in programming languages. To verify programs we must be able to reason about these structures. However, as programming languages often involve multiple data domains, in program verification decision procedures for a single theory are usually not applicable. An important class of mixed constraints consists of combinations of data structures with integer constraints on the size of data structures. Such constraints can express memory safety properties such as absence of memory overflow and out-of-bound array access, which are crucial for program correctness. In this paper we extend the theory of term algebras with the length function which maps a term to its size, resulting in a combined theory of term algebras and Presburger arithmetic. This arithmetic extension provides a natural but tight coupling between the two theories, and hence the general purpose combination methods like Nelson-Oppen combination are not applicable. We present decision procedures for quantifier-free theories in structures with an infinite constant domain and with a finite constant domain. We also present a quantifier elimination procedure for the extended first-order theory that can remove a block of existential quantifiers in one step. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Many approaches to deciding the satisfiability of quantifier-free formulae with respect to a background theory T—also known as Satisfiability Modulo Theory, or SMT(T)—rely on the integration between an enumerator of truth assignments and a decision procedure for conjunction of literals in T. When the background theory T is the combination of two simpler theories, the approach is typically instantiated by means of a theory combination schema (e.g. Nelson–Oppen, Shostak). In this paper we propose a new approach to SMT, where the enumerator of truth assignments is integrated with two decision procedures, one for T 1 and one for T 2, acting independently from each other. The key idea is to search for a truth assignment not only to the atoms occurring in the formula, but also to all the equalities between variables which are shared between the theories. This approach is simple and expressive: for instance, no modification is required to handle non-convex theories (as opposed to traditional Nelson-Oppen combinations which require a mechanism for splitting). Furthermore, it can be made practical by leveraging on state-of-the-art boolean and SMT search techniques, and on theory layering (i.e., cheaper reasoning first, and more often). We provide thorough experimental evidence to support our claims: we instantiate the framework with two decision procedures for the combinations of Equality and Uninterpreted Functions () and Linear Arithmetic (), both for (the convex case of) reals and for (the non-convex case of) integers; we analyze the impact of the different optimizations on a variety of test cases; and we compare the approach with state-of-the-art competitor tools, showing that our implemented tool compares positively with them, sometimes with dramatic gains in performance. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Previous results for combining decision procedures for the word problem in the non-disjoint case do not apply to equational theories induced by modal logics—which are not disjoint for sharing the theory of Boolean algebras. Conversely, decidability results for the fusion of modal logics are strongly tailored towards the special theories at hand, and thus do not generalize to other types of equational theories. In this paper, we present a new approach for combining decision procedures for the word problem in the non-disjoint case that applies to equational theories induced by modal logics, but is not restricted to them. The known fusion decidability results for modal logics are instances of our approach. However, even for equational theories induced by modal logics our results are more general since they are not restricted to so-called normal modal logics. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]