Search

Most research has investigated the seat-to-head transmissibility during single-axis excitations. Associations between head accelerations and discomfort or effects on vision were reported. Possible differences between the seat-to-head transmissibility determined during different vibration magnitudes with a variable number of excitation axes have not been systematically examined. An experimental study was performed with 8 male subjects sitting on a rigid seat with hands on a support. They were exposed to random whole-body vibration (E1=0.45 ms(-2), E2=0.90 ms(-2), and E3=1.80 ms(-2)) to single- and three-axis vibration. All translational and rotational seat-to-head transmissibilities were calculated. The effects of the factors vibration magnitude and number of axes on the peak modulus and frequency of the seat-to-head transmissibilities were tested. In general the head motions follow constant pattern. These pattern of head motions comprise a combination of rotational and translational shares of transmissions, i.e. the curves show a dependence on the factors 'vibration magnitude' and 'number of vibration axes'. Mechanical properties of the soft tissue, relative motions of body parts, and muscle reactions were supposed to cause the nonlinearities of the head. Future research should consider effects of multi-axis vibration, if conclusions shall be drawn for the evaluation of possible health effects and model validations.

In a laboratory experiment, six male subjects were exposed to sinusoidal (0.8, 1.6, 3.15, 6.3 and 12.5 Hz) or random octave band-width white noise (mid-frequencies identical to those of the sinusoidal vibrations) whole-body vibration in x- or y-directions, at six levels of magnitude (0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 m/s(2) r.m.s. non- and frequency-weighted) with two repetitions. In order to examine time effects, additional reference stimuli were used. Each subject was exposed to these 304 exposure conditions with a duration of about one minute on four different days (76 exposures per day). The subject's sensations of vibration intensity and vibration comfort were obtained by cross modality matching (length of a line). The subjects sat with an upright posture on a hard seat without backrest, hands on the thighs. The derived equivalent sensation contours suggest an underestimation of the sensation varying in extent from 2 dB to 8 dB at 1.6, 3.15, 6.3 and 12.5 Hz in comparison with the reference frequency 0.8 Hz for both types and directions of signals by the current evaluation methods according to ISO 2631-1 with the most pronounced effects revealed at the frequencies 3.15 and 6.3 Hz and at lower intensities (overall vibration total value a(ov) around 0.48 m/s(2) to 0.8 m/s(2) at the reference frequency 0.8 Hz).