Search

Introduction: There is no consensus in literature on the surgical treatment of patients with Crowe type III/IV patients. Each arthroplasty procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this study by placing the acetabular cup between the true and false acetabulum, we aimed to share our experience about criteria of patient selection, surgical technique, and mid-term results of THA (total hip arthroplasty) in which the risk of dislocation was minimized using a standard-sized acetabular cup. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of the patients with Crowe type III/IV treated by cementless THA without femoral shortening osteotomy from January 2015 to January 2020. The clinical (Harris hip score, Trendelenburg sign, limb lengths) and radiographic (AP/L hip X-ray, 3D CT) examinations before surgery; 1, 3 months and 1 year after the surgery were evaluated. All postsurgical complications were noted. Results: Among all, 268 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-two patients (11.9%) were male and 236 (88.1%) were female. Mean age was 46.8 years. Mean follow-up duration was 42.4 (26–57) months. Mean Harris Hip score (HHS) was 49.7 and Trendelenburg sign was positive in all patients preoperatively. In the final evaluation, mean HHS significantly improved to 80.2 (p < 0.005) and none of the patients had Trendelenburg sign. Mean lengthening of the operated leg was 4.3 cm. Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty with placement of acetabular cup between true and false acetabulum can be successfully preferred in selected patients with Crowe III/IV dysplasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a relatively common disorder of the paediatric age group and can have a significant impact on the quality of life, if left untreated. Some research has been done in this field from India over the past many decades, thereby helping to attain the present state of knowledge about DDH. Through this review, an attempt was made to identify and acknowledge important contributions in this field from India. Purpose: To provide some historical aspects and summarise the evidence developed in India concerning different facets of DDH since 1920. Methods: Information about the evolution of DDH management in India was collated from recollections of the senior author (ANJ), from existing records, and contributions from senior Paediatric Orthopaedic surgeons of the country. The Medline database was searched for Indian literature concerning different aspects of DDH. All studies published in English language were included. Included studies were categorised into original studies, reviews, book chapters, case series and case reports, and their contribution to the understanding of DDH was highlighted. Results: The analysis showed 63 published studies on DDH from India. The majority of publications occurred between 2011 and 2020. Retrospective cohort studies and reviews comprised 46% of the published literature. Conclusion: There is a scarcity of research on DDH from India, with many knowledge gaps still prevalent. The overall quality of published literature is poor, with very few good quality original research. However, an increasing trend for research on different aspects of DDH was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify literature on variations and knowledge gaps in the incidence, diagnosis, and management of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) in India. Methods: Following standard methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping systematic review of literature on incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of DDH in India was conducted. Studies conducted in India, published in indexed or non-indexed journals between 1975 and March 2021, were included in the search. Results: Of 57 articles which met the inclusion criteria, only 33 studies (57.8%) were PubMed-indexed. Twenty-eight studies (49%) were published in Orthopaedic journals and majority had orthopaedic surgeon as the lead author (59.6%). Sixteen studies were mainly epidemiological, 20 reported screening/diagnosis, and 21 reported treatment of DDH. Almost 90% of the studies (51) were Level 4 or 5 according to the levels of evidence in research. There is lack of clarity in the definition of hip dysplasia and screening/diagnostic guidelines to be used. The incidence of hip dysplasia in India is reported to be 0–75 per 1000 live births, with true DDH between 0 and 2.6/1000. Late-presenting DDH is common in India, with most studies reporting a mean age of > 20 months for children presenting for treatment. The treatment is also varied and there is no clear evidence-based approach to various treatment options, with lack of long-term studies. Conclusion: This systematic scoping review highlights various knowledge gaps pertaining to DDH diagnosis and management in India. High-quality, multicentric research in identified gap areas, with long-term follow-up, is desired in future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Traditional swaddling, which implies restrictive immobilisation of the infant's lower limbs with the hips in forced extension and adduction, has been shown to be a risk factor for Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH). Methods: We reviewed the literature regarding the correlation between DDH and post-natal positioning by swaddling and baby-wearing, to draw awareness of healthcare professionals towards an important risk factor for DDH that has often been overlooked. Results: There is overwhelming evidence in the literature, by both experimental and clinical studies, that proves the close association between improper post-natal positioning of the baby's hips in extension-adduction and an increased incidence of DDH. On the other hand, "hip safe" swaddling which allows unrestricted flexion-abduction movements of the infants' hips, and the use of baby-wearing devices which keep the lower limbs in an attitude of hip flexion-abduction and knee flexion, is optimal for hip development. Populations which practice these "hip-safe" techniques of infant immobilisation have a lower incidence of DDH as compared to those which practice restrictive immobilisation. Furthermore, populations which have adopted "hip-safe" positioning have demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of DDH. Understanding this association is vital, since this is a modifiable risk factor, rectification of which can decrease the incidence of DDH. Conclusion: Policy makers and governments must design educational campaigns tailored to their respective populations to increase awareness regarding the benefits of "hip-safe" techniques of infant positioning, since this simple intervention has the potential of decreasing the incidence of DDH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) represents a spectrum from acetabular dysplasia to fixed dislocation, giving disability through premature osteoarthritis. Most DDH cases continue to present without any known risk factors such as breech presentation, female sex, and family history. Incidence and population-based outcomes of DDH are difficult to reliably establish due to many DDH definitions and classifications using different types of examinations. Purpose: This review takes a historical perspective on the role of imaging in DDH. Methods: Pelvic radiographs (X-Ray) were amongst the first medical images identifying DDH, but these have a limited role in infancy due to absent ossification. In the 1980s, ultrasound led to a large expansion in infant DDH screening. Unfortunately, even for well-trained users, DDH indices on ultrasound generally lack reproducibility, and have led to overdiagnosis of mild DDH. CT and MRI more thoroughly evaluate the 3D hip deformity in DDH, but are costly, less available and involve radiation dose and/or anaesthesia. Results: Recently 3D ultrasound has been used to characterize the 3D deformity of DDH more fully, with improved inter-observer reliability, particularly amongst novice users. 3D ultrasound is also well suited to automated image analysis, but high-resolution 3D probes are costly and not widely available. Conclusion: Combining the latest handheld portable ultrasound probes and artificial intelligence analysis could lead to an inexpensive tool permitting practical mass population screening for DDH. Overall, our understanding of DDH is heavily influenced by the imaging tools used to visualize it and changing quickly with modern technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a common disorder of childhood and has a good prognosis when treated at an early age. In spite of being a significant concern, many children with DDH are not picked early and present late at walking age. In our country, it is presumed to be due to absence of a national policy for screening of DDH. Screening programmes including the combination of clinical and radiological methods in different ways have been suggested. However, the exact method of screening is controversial. Purpose: To analyze effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various screening methods for DDH. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline database was explored for original case series and randomized clinical trials. Inclusion criteria were English language, screening for DDH in neonates, sample size more than 500, and studies with minimum duration of one year. Results: Thirty-four studies were selected to write the manuscript. This included 23 studies looking for effectiveness of a screening programme and 11 studies comparing various outcomes of different screening strategies. A trend favoring universal ultrasound screening was observed Conclusion: The literature supports universal ultrasound screening and has proved its cost-effectiveness. However, considering the logistic and financial challenges in our country, immediate implementation of universal ultrasound screening seems impractical. In the absence of any current guidelines for screening for DDH in India, we suggest professional organizations involved in the care of children and public health policy-makers to come together to develop national screening guidelines for DDH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common skeletal dysplasia. Two principal methods used in early diagnosis of DDH are clinical examination and ultrasonographic investigation. Dogruel et al. found a low specificity of clinical examination in patients with DDH. Additionally, Kamath et al. stated that ultrasonography performed by a radiologist in routine clinical practice is more reliable than physical examination performed by the average clinician. In clinical practice, the application and assessment of hip ultrasonography are completed by a single person. This assessment determines the followup of the patient. Thus, hip ultrasonography performed on the same person by different individuals underthe same conditions will yield a more accurate assessment of the reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of DDH. Although inter-observer reliability was high in many previous studies of ultrasound image evaluation, reliability rates vary among studies of the application of ultrasonography. Materials and Methods: Inter-examiner reliability of hip ultrasonography was analyzed among four investigators who separately evaluated 100 hips (50 infants). The obtained bone structure angles (α), cartilage structure angles (β), and distribution of hip types were compared among the investigators. All infants were brought to the hospital for a healthy child followup examination, according to the country's health policy. Babies between 0 and 6 months were included in the study. Babies with any neuromuscular disorders, neural tube defects or any type of genetic anomalies were excluded from the study. The study was explained to the families of all infants and written informed consent was obtained. Results: There was a significant difference in the hip type determined by the investigators with respect to α and β angles (P< 0.01, P< 0.01, P= 0.002). The average alpha measurements of the first orthopedist, second orthopedist, first radiologist, and second radiologist were 67.38 ± 6.24, 65.60 ± 5.84, 65.44 ± 4.59, and 62.59 ± 4.50, respectively. The average beta measurements of the first orthopedist, second orthopedist, first radiologist, and second radiologist were 53.85 ± 8.86, 50.74 ± 7.80, 44.77 ± 6.30, and 44.39 ± 5.81, respectively. Agreement among the results obtained by the clinicians was investigated in dual comparisons. The relative agreement according to the alpha angle ranged from 3.6% to 44.5%, and the relative concordance according to the beta angle ranged from 0.9% to 45.3%. Agreement regarding hip typing was determined to range from 19.1% to 42.6%. Conclusion: Sonographic evaluation of the hip appears to vary depending on the investigator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) varies according to the age of the patient. For children under 3 months, the preferred treatment is Pavlik bandaging and/or dynamic hip orthosis;for children of 3-18 months (with/without arthrography), closed and open reductions (ORs) are most common; and for children 18 months and older, pelvic osteotomies are used. Radiological and functional outcomes of patients between 16 months and 7 years of age who underwent Pemberton pericapsular osteotomy (PPO) were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) received treatment on 14 hips between 2001 and 2006. All patients with DDH had PPO as pelvic osteotomy. PPO was done solely in 3 hips, PPO and open reduction (OR) in and OR + PPO + femoral shortening in 6. The average age was 39.85 months (range 16-83 months). All had 1-stage surgery. Acetabular index (AI) and the grade of displacement were determined according to Tönnis'. Center-edge (CE) angle was evaluated. Clinical evaluations were made as described by McKay, radiological assessments by Severin's criteria and femoral head avascular necrosis measurements by Kalamchi-MacEwen's criteria. Average followup periods were 83.35 months (range 48-115 months). Results: Preoperative and postoperative average AI levels were 41.92° (range 30-50°) and 19,5° (range 5-34°), respectively ( P < 0.001). According to Severin's classification, 11 (78.57%) patients were Ia, 1 (7.14%) was Ib, 1 (7.14%) was II and 1 (7.14%) was III. According to Kalamchi-McEven criteria, 12 (85.71%) patients were type I, 2 (14.28%) patients were type II. CE postoperatively was measured as 24.24° (range 12-41°). Clinically (McKay), the functional results in 13 (92.85%) patients were very good (I) and in 1 (7.14%) was good (II). Conclusions: Functional and radiological mid term outcomes were found to be comparable in most of the patients with DDH undergoing PPO between the ages of 16 months and 7 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a common condition presenting to a pediatric orthopedic surgeon. There is a consensus on the surgical treatment of children with ages ranged from 18 to 24 months where majority agree on open reduction and hip spica. Open reduction was done with an additional pelvic procedure wherever required to get better results and prevent residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) and early osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: 35 children with unilateral DDH were operated between 2002 and 2007 at our institute. Open reduction was performed in all using the standard anterior approach and peroperative test for hip stability was done. Nine children got an additional pelvic procedure in the form of Dega acetabuloplasty. All were followed up for a minimal period of 2 years (range 2‑7 years). Results: No hip got redislocated. At the end of 18 months, there were seven cases of RAD with acetabular index (AI) of 35° and above. These were all from the group where open reduction alone was done. Conclusion: We feel that a preoperative AI of >40° and a per‑operative safe‑zone <20° increases the need for supplementary pelvic osteotomy in age group of 18 to 24 months because in such cases, the remodeling capacity of the acetabulum is unable to overcome the dysplasia and to form a relatively normal acetabulum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]