1. Place of birth and risk of gallbladder cancer in India
- Author
-
Rajini Nagrani, Prachi Patil, Preetha Rajaraman, Rajesh Dikshit, Freddie Bray, Mathieu Laversanne, Atul Budukh, RA Badwe, Shubhada V. Chiplunkar, and Sharayu Mhatre
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,India ,Context (language use) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,medicine ,Humans ,Genetic Predisposition to Disease ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Registries ,Gallbladder cancer ,education ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Case-control study ,Odds ratio ,Place of birth ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Cancer registry ,Surgery ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Case-Control Studies ,Female ,Gallbladder Neoplasms ,business ,Demography - Abstract
Context: Within India, the incidence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is characterized by marked geographical variation; however, the reasons for these differences are unclear. AIMS: To evaluate the role of place of birth, length of residence, and effect of migration from high- to low-risk region on GBC development. Settings and Design: Population-based cancer registries (PBCRs); case–control study. Subjects and Methods: Data of PBCRs were used to demonstrate geographical variation in GBC incidence rates. A case–control study data examined the role of birth place, residence length, and effect of migration in etiology of GBC. Statistical Analysis: Rate ratios for different PBCRs were estimated using Chennai Cancer Registry as the reference population. Odds ratios (ORs) for developing GBC in a high-risk region compared to a low-risk region and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated through unconditional logistic regression models using case–control study. Results: GBC shows marked variation in incidence with risk highest in Northeast regions and lowest in South India. OR of 4.82 (95% CI: 3.87–5.99) was observed for developing GBC for individuals born in a high-risk region compared to those born in a low-risk region after adjusting for confounders. A dose–response relationship with increased risk with increased length of residence in a high-risk region was observed (OR lifetime 5.58 [95% CI: 4.42–7.05]; Ptrend ≤ 0.001). The risk persisted even if study participant migrated from high- to low-risk region (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02–1.82). Conclusions: The present study signifies the importance of place of birth, length of stay, and effect of migration from high- to low-risk region in the development of GBC. The data indicate role of environmental and genetic factors in etiology of disease.
- Published
- 2017