Search

Background: The evaluation of the immune status of cancer patients is not routinely included in clinical oncological practice mainly because of the great number of candidate immune parameters that could potentially be the best index of the status of anticancer immunity. Until recently, the T-helper/T-suppressor lymphocyte ratio (CD4/CD8) was considered to be an index of immunosuppression in cancer patients. Successive studies documented the existence of several subtypes of CD4+ lymphocytes, as well as showing that CD8+ cells were not in fact suppressive, but cytotoxic lymphocytes. More recently, the existence of a subtype of T-helper lymphocytes has been demonstrated provided by an evident suppressive activity on anticancer immunity. These are the so-called T-regulator (T-reg) lymphocytes, which may be detected as CD4+CD25+ cells., Materials and Methods: A study was carried out to evaluate CD4+/CD4+CD25+ ratio, corresponding to the T-helper/T-reg cell ratio (TH/TR), in a group of 50 cancer patients in relation to their disease extension and in 20 healthy controls., Results: The mean TH/TR ratio observed in patients with metasytases was significantly lower with respect to that found in both patients without metastases and controls. On the contrary, the absolute mean number of T-reg cells was higher in patients with metastases than in those without, but the difference was not statistically significant., Conclusion: The evaluation of T-reg cells in terms of their proportion with respect to T-helper cell total number seems to be more appropriate than the simple measurement of their absolute count, in order to quantify cancer-related immunosuppression. Thus, the TH/TR ratio could represent a useful biological marker to explore the immune status of cancer patients.

In addition to the occurrence of pain, the evidence of a diminished capacity to feel pleasure is one of the most common cancer-related symptoms. Recent advances in psychoneuroendocrinological knowledge has shown that the perception of pleasure is mainly mediated by the dopaminergic pathways in the brain. Moreover, it has also been demonstrated that the brain dopaminergic sensitivity may be clinically explored by evaluating the endocrine response to the administration of dopaminergic agents, such as apomorphine, which consists of a decline in PRL concentrations and an increase in GH and cortisol levels. The present study was performed to evaluate dopaminergic sensitivity by the administration of apomorphine in cancer patients in an attempt to document possible cancer-related neuroendocrine anomalies, which could explain the psychological status of the patients. The study included 24 cancer patients (breast cancer: 12; colorectal cancer: 7; non-small cell lung cancer: 5), 12 of whom showed distant organ metastases. Apomorphine was given orally at 0.01 mg/kg b.w., by collecting venous blood samples before and after 20 and 60 minutes. A normal decline in PRL levels was seen in both non-metastatic and metastatic cancer patients. No cortisol increase in response to apomorphine was achieved and the lack of cortisol response was particularly evident in metastatic patients. No GH rise occurred in either metastatic or non-metastatic cancer patients. Finally, no significant difference in the endocrine response to apomorphine was seen in relation to the histotype of tumor. The results of this study show that the neoplastic disease is characterized by neurochemical alterations involving pleasure-related dopaminergic pathways, which are more evident in the metastatic disease, without particular differences in relation to tumor histotype. Therefore, the psychological condition of cancer patients would not depend only on psychological factors, but it could be due at least in part to cancer-related neuroendocrine alterations involving the dopaminergic system.

Immunochemotherapeutic combinations containing IL-2 theoretically represent the most effective therapies for metastatic melanoma, particularly in association with cisplatin (CDDP); however, both IL-2 and CDDP have been generally utilized at high doses, with the consequence of considerable toxicity. According to psychoneuroimmunological knowledge, the antitumor activity of IL-2 has been proven to be enhanced by the immunomodulating pineal neurohormone melatonin (MLT), which has also been shown to increase the cytotoxicity of cancer chemotherapy and reduce its toxicity. On this basis, a study was planned with low-dose IL-2 and CDDP in association with MLT as a second-line therapy for metastatic melanoma patients progressing on dacarbazine plus interferon-alpha. The study included 13 evaluable patients. CDDP was injected i.v. at 30 mg/m2/day for 3 days every 21 days. IL-2 was administered s.c. at 3 million IU/day from days 4 to 9 and from days 11 to 16 of the cycle. Finally, MLT was given orally at 20 mg/day in the evening, every day without interruption. One patient obtained a complete response (CR), while partial response (PR) was achieved in 3 other patients. Therefore, the objective tumor response-rate (CR + PR) was 4 out of 13 (31%). A stable disease occurred in 5 patients, whereas the remaining 4 patients had a progressive disease. The treatment was extremely well-tolerated in all patients and, in particular, no CDDP-related neurotoxicity was observed. The results of this preliminary study would suggest that low-dose CDDP and IL-2 in association with the pineal hormone MLT (P.I.M. schedule), given as a second line therapy, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for metastatic melanoma, with a clinical efficacy at least comparable to that obtained with a first-line therapy of dacarbazine plus interferon-alpha.