Search

Generic human detectors perform poorly in application scenes in which conditions are significantly different from those of the benchmark data sets. Based on the assumption that only a limited number of labeled examples are available, we propose a variant semi-supervised boosting approach for improving scene adaptiveness by utilizing unlabeled data. Specifically, we train a max-margin-based model as an initial detector for new example collection, instead of using generic detectors, and then a better model is trained via boosting in which the newly obtained examples influence the training process through their similarities to the labeled examples. Since the widely used human descriptors are usually high dimensional and redundant, we employ a graph-based method to determine the weight representing the importance of each feature, such that the weighted similarity measurement leads to a performance gain. In the experiments, the effectiveness of the proposed approach “Variant SemiBoost” is demonstrated and state-of-the-art performance on challenging data sets is achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compared with other applications in computer vision, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have underperformed on pedestrian detection. A breakthrough was made very recently using sophisticated deep CNN (DCNN) models, with a number of handcrafted features or explicit occlusion handling mechanism. In this paper, we show that by reusing the convolutional feature maps of a DCNN model as image features to train an ensemble of boosted decision models, we are able to achieve the best reported accuracy without using specially designed learning algorithms. We empirically identify and disclose important implementation details. We also show that pixel labeling may be simply combined with a detector to boost the detection performance. By adding complementary handcrafted features such as optical flow, the DCNN-based detector can be further improved. We advance the state-of-the-art results by lowering the log-average miss rate from 11.7% to 8.9% on the Caltech data set and from 11.2% to 8.6% on the Inria data set. We also achieve a comparable result to state-of-the-art approaches on the KITTI data set. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]