Search

We present a domain decomposition (DD) framework for the analysis of impenetrable structures; it allows for the electric field integral equation (EFIE) and combined field integral equation (CFIE), and for open, closed, and open–closed structures. The DD results in an effective preconditioner for large and complex problems exploiting iterative solution and fast factorizations. The DD employs specialized transmission conditions among the domains, and the use of discontinuous Galerkin (DG) allows conformal as well as nonconformal discretizations of domain boundaries; the nonconformal nature of the decomposition gives considerable flexibility in the meshing. The strategy is highly parallelizable, as all the operations involving the subdomains can be performed in parallel. The proposed scheme is implementation independent and can be easily merged with existing electromagnetic codes. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The electromagnetic dual-primal finite element tearing and interconnecting (FETI-DPEM) method is a nonoverlapping domain decomposition method developed for the finite element analysis of large-scale electromagnetic problems, where the corner edges are globally numbered. This paper presents an extension of the FETI-DPEM2 method, named FETI-full dual primal (FETI-FDP2), where more flexible Robin-type boundary conditions are imposed, on the inner interfaces between subdomains as well as on the corner edges, leading to a new interface problem. Its capacities are tested in the framework of a three-dimensional (3-D) free-space scattering problem, with a scattered field formulation and a computational domain truncated by perfectly mathed layers (PML). First, we compare its accuracy with respect to other FETI-DPEM2 methods and to a complete resolution of the FEM problem, thanks to a direct sparse solver. We show that the convergence of iterative solvers is affected by the presence of the PML and can be accelerated by means of a more accurate approximation, between adjacent subdomains, of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) operator. The effectiveness of the iterative solvers are also considered for different test cases. The advantages of the proposed FETI-FDP2 method combined with the associated DtN approximation is numerically demonstrated, regardless the chosen working frequency or the iterative solvers. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]