Search

Auditory metronomes have been used to preserve movement consistency when examining local dynamic stability (LDS) and coordination variability (CV) of lumbar spine motion during repetitive movements. However, the potential influence of the metronome itself on these outcome measures has rarely been considered. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of different metronome paces (i.e., lifting speeds) on measures of lumbar spine LDS and thorax-pelvis CV during a repetitive lifting/lowering task in comparison to self-paced movements. Ten participants completed 5 repetitive lift/lower trials, where participants completed 35 consecutive repetitions (analysis on last 30 repetitions) at a self-selected pace for the first and last trial, and were paced by a 10 lift/min, 15 lift/min, and 20 lift/min metronome, in randomized order, for the remaining three trials. The average self-paced lift/lower speed before and after experiencing the three different metronome paced speeds was 16.2 (±1.02) and 17.2 (±0.73) lifts/min, respectively, and the most-preferred metronome pace trial was 15 lifts/min. Thorax-pelvis CV during the self-paced trials were similar (p > 0.05) to the 15 lift/min metronome paced trials, while greater thorax-pelvis CV was observed for the 10 lift/min compared to the 15 lift/min and 20 lift/min and second self-paced trial (all p < 0.026). This movement speed effect was not observed for lumbar spine LDS; however, more-dynamically stable movements were observed during all metronome paced trials in comparison to the self-paced trials. This study highlights that careful consideration is required when employing a metronome to control/manipulate movement characteristics while examining neuromuscular control using non-linear dynamical systems measures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A central application of Uncontrolled Manifold (UCM) analysis is the quantification of the presence of motor synergies for the control of task-level variables during human movement. Choosing which task-level variable to analyse is a critical step in UCM analyses because this choice determines a relationship linking the motor performance and motor control. End-effector and/or centre of mass position are frequently chosen as task-level variables, whereas velocity and acceleration receive relatively little attention in this regard. Additionally, UCM analyses are most often conducted on discrete time points of a movement cycle, although these singular time points do not necessarily represent the characteristics of the whole cycle. Accordingly, the purpose of this investigation was to explore synergistic hand control during simulated Nordic skiing. It was hypothesized that 1) hand velocity would be a controlled task-level variable, 2) hand position would not be a controlled task-level variable, and 3) synergistic control of hand kinematics would be fluid (not constant throughout the movement cycle). Seven varsity-level skiers completed a simulated Nordic skiing task, producing specified power outputs on a Nordic skiing ergometer. Normalized time series of indices of task control from UCM analyses were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. Synergies were observed for all of position, velocity, and acceleration (p < 0.0001), but not for the entire- skiing cycle. Therefore, UCM analyses conducted on discrete time points are not recommended without suitable a priori justification because its outputs fluctuate across time- especially during continuous movements. Velocity and acceleration should be considered in the choice of task-level variables, especially if they help define task performance., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cognitive motor interference (CMI) is a psychomotor phenomenon characterized by alterations in kinematic spatial-temporal parameters during concurrent cognitive and motor tasks (i.e. dual-tasking). Previous literature has demonstrated that cognitive-motor dual-tasking induces alterations gait parameters; however, the influence of CMI on spine reflexive motion has yet to be researched. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of cognitive-motor dual-tasking during unexpected spine loading, in particular focusing on paraspinal muscle responses and spine sub-regional kinematic responses. To do this, the spine was perturbed by unexpectedly dropping a 6.8 kg mass into the participants' hands during cognitive dual-task and control conditions. Intersegmental spine angles, paraspinal muscle onset latencies, baseline activations, and response magnitudes were measured. The results demonstrated that participants experienced greater spine flexion at all intersegmental levels during the cognitive dual-task condition compared to the control condition. Additionally, muscle onset latencies were significantly delayed in three of the four paraspinal muscles studied when performing the cognitive-motor dual-task. These results demonstrate that the additional cognitive load led to delayed muscle activation responses and subsequently greater intersegmental lumbar spine flexion in response to a sudden loading perturbation. This suggests that cognitive-motor dual-tasking may increase the risk of developing an acute spine injury under similar conditions., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Given the appropriate cues, kinematic factors associated with low back injury risk and pain, such as spine flexion, can be avoided. Recent research has demonstrated the potential for tactile sensory information to change movement. In this study an athletic strapping tape was applied bilaterally along the lumbar extensor muscles to provide continuous tactile feedback information during a repeated lifting and lowering task. The presence of the tape resulted in a statistically significant reduction in lumbar spine flexion when compared to a baseline condition in which no tape was present. This reduction was further increased with the explicit instruction to pay attention to the sensations elicited by the tape. In both cases, the reduction in lumbar spine flexion was compensated for by increases in hip and knee flexion. When the tape was then removed and participants were instructed to continue lifting as if it was still present, the reduction in lumbar flexion and increases in hip and knee flexion were retained. Thus this study provides evidence that tactile cues can provide vital feedback information that can cue human lumbar spine movement to reduce kinematic factors associated with injury risk and pain., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to induce both trunk extensor and abdominal muscle fatigue, on separate occasions, and compare their effects on standing postural control and trunk proprioception, as well as look at the effects of a recovery period on these outcome measures. A total of 20 individuals participated, with 10 (5 males and 5 females) completing either a standing postural control or lumbar axial repositioning protocol. Participants completed their randomly assigned protocol on two occasions, separated by at least 4  days, with either their trunk extensor or abdominal muscles being fatigued on either day. Postural control centre of pressure variables and trunk proprioception errors were compared pre- and post-fatigue. Results showed that both trunk extensor and abdominal muscle fatigue significantly degraded standing postural control immediately post-fatigue, with recovery occurring within 2 min post-fatigue. In general, these degradative effects on postural control appeared to be greater when the trunk extensor muscles were fatigued compared to the abdominal muscles. No statistically significant changes in trunk proprioception were found after either fatigue protocol. The present findings demonstrate our body's ability to quickly adapt and reweight somatosensory information to maintain postural control and trunk proprioception, as well as illustrate the importance of considering the abdominal muscles, along with the trunk extensor muscles, when considering the impact of fatigue on trunk movement and postural control., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)