Search

We have characterized HLA incompatibilities in a group of 16 B44-positive patients who were serologically ABDR matched with their 23 (unrelated) potential bone marrow donors. After analysis with a combination of cellular techniques, IEF for HLA-A/B and oligotyping for class II and HLA-B44, 44% of the patients revealed one or more HLA incompatibility with at least one of their potential donors. CTL activity was detected in 12 of the 22 combinations tested. CTL incompatibility occurred more frequently in DR subtype-mismatched combinations, but CTL reactivity was always directed against class I. To characterize these incompatibilities between matched unrelated individuals, we analyzed the specificity of T-cell clones from seven primary CTL cultures. In three combinations, CTL reactivity was directed against a subtype of B44. In two combinations, the CTL reactivity was directed against a non-B44 class I subtype. In two of seven combinations, the CTLs recognized an antigen that, though unconditionally associated with B4403, was expressed by 60% of the B4403+ cells only. Because all 12 of these B4403+ targets recognized could be typed for one HLA-C allele only (Cwl-Cw8), we believe that this alloreactivity might be directed against a serologically undefined Cw antigen.

We have set up a simple PCR-SSO oligotyping procedure that is able to discriminate ten HLA-A2 (2 PCR/11 probes), two HLA-A3 (1 PCR/1 probe), and two HLA-B44 subtypes (1 PCR/2 probes). The frequency of these subtypes has been determined in a large panel of local blood donors and leukemic patients in combination with their unrelated potential donors. A*0201 and A*0301 were the predominant subtypes (> 95%) for A2 and A3, respectively. B*4402 occurred twice as frequently as B*4403. A2 and B44 subtype mismatches were analyzed in a group of 30 patients and their 116 unrelated potential donors who were matched serologically (low-stringency matching: AB without splits, DR1-10). For seven patients (23%) at least one A2- or B44-subtype-mismatched donor was found. For two of these patients (7%), the subtype-mismatched donor would have been considered as compatible on the basis of high stringency matching (AB splits, DRB1 subtypes, DRB3/B5). For one patient of Mediterranean origin, all five donors recruited from a north European registry (matched with high stringency) appeared to be subtype incompatible (A*0201/A*0205). The rather low percentage of A2- and B4-subtype mismatches in DRB1/B3/B5 matched combinations confirms the significance of linkage disequilibria of HLA antigens. Because unrelated donor selection is done through international registries, however, class I subtyping might be necessary when individuals originate from different geographic areas.

We have characterized HLA incompatibilities in a group of 17 B35-positive patients who were ABDR matched (AB serology and oligotyping for DR1-14) with their 28 (unrelated) potential bone marrow donors. High-resolution oligotyping for DR subtypes disclosed that nine combinations were in fact DR mismatched. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity was detected in nine combinations (32%). In the group matched for DR subtypes, three (16%) of 19 combinations were CTL positive. Patient-specific cytotoxic activity appeared to be directed against HLA C (two cases) or against a subtype of B35. In the group of DR-subtype-mismatched combinations, CTL activity was found in six (67%) of nine pairs. In all four cases that were studied in detail, however, CTL reactivity appeared to be directed against a variant subtype of B35. We have studied the B35 incompatibilities recognized in five different combinations by specificity analysis of the B35-specific CTLs and by partially sequencing of relevant segments of B35 exon 3. Preliminary data show that, within this relatively small Caucasoid group, at least five B35-variant subtypes could be distinguished. This would make B35 an antigen that will be frequently subtype mismatched, in particular when DR matching is done with low resolution (DR1-14) only.