Search

Resting‐state functional connectivity (FC) is widely used in multivariate pattern analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), including identifying the locations of putative brain functional borders, predicting individual phenotypes, and diagnosing clinical mental diseases. However, limited attention has been paid to the analysis of functional interactions from a frequency perspective. In this study, by contrasting coherence‐based and correlation‐based FC with two machine learning tasks, we observed that measuring FC in the frequency domain helped to identify finer functional subregions and achieve better pattern discrimination capability relative to the temporal correlation. This study has proven the feasibility of coherence in the analysis of fMRI, and the results indicate that modeling functional interactions in the frequency domain may provide richer information than that in the time domain, which may provide a new perspective on the analysis of functional neuroimaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Until now, dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) based on functional magnetic resonance imaging is typically estimated on a set of predefined regions of interest (ROIs) derived from an anatomical or static functional atlas which follows an implicit assumption of functional homogeneity within ROIs underlying temporal fluctuation of functional coupling, potentially leading to biases or underestimation of brain network dynamics. Here, we presented a novel computational method based on dynamic functional connectivity degree (dFCD) to derive meaningful brain parcellations that can capture functional homogeneous regions in temporal variance of functional connectivity. Several spatially distributed but functionally meaningful areas that are well consistent with known intrinsic connectivity networks were identified through independent component analysis (ICA) of time‐varying dFCD maps. Furthermore, a systematical comparison with commonly used brain atlases, including the Anatomical Automatic Labeling template, static ICA‐driven parcellation and random parcellation, demonstrated that the ROI‐definition strategy based on the proposed dFC‐driven parcellation could better capture the interindividual variability in dFC and predict observed individual cognitive performance (e.g., fluid intelligence, cognitive flexibility, and sustained attention) based on chronnectome. Together, our findings shed new light on the functional organization of resting brains at the timescale of seconds and emphasized the significance of a dFC‐driven and voxel‐wise functional homogeneous parcellation for network dynamics analyses in neuroscience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antisocial behavior (ASB) is believed to have neural substrates; however, the association between ASB and functional brain networks remains unclear. The temporal variability of the functional connectivity (or dynamic FC) derived from resting‐state functional MRI has been suggested as a useful metric for studying abnormal behaviors including ASB. This is the first study using low‐frequency fluctuations of the dynamic FC to unravel potential system‐level neural correlates with ASB. Specifically, we individually associated the dynamic FC patterns with the ASB scores (measured by Antisocial Process Screening Device) of the male offenders (age: 23.29 ± 3.36 years) based on machine learning. Results showed that the dynamic FCs were associated with individual ASB scores. Moreover, we found that it was mainly the inter‐network dynamic FCs that were negatively associated with the ASB severity. Three major high‐order cognitive functional networks and the sensorimotor network were found to be more associated with ASB. We further found that impaired behavior in the ASB subjects was mainly associated with decreased FC dynamics in these networks, which may explain why ASB subjects usually have impaired executive control and emotional processing functions. Our study shows that temporal variation of the FC could be a promising tool for ASB assessment, treatment, and prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]