Search

Dose-response relationships have been suggested for the role of estradiol (E2) in the induction of both the LH surge and estrous behavior in the ewe. However, it is not always clear whether it is the amount of E2 or the length of time that E2 is present that is important. Furthermore, in previous studies, the intensity of sexual behavior has rarely been studied quantitatively. Our aims in this work were to analyze in more detail the effects of two injected doses of estradiol benzoate (25 or 50 micrograms) for the induction of both the LH surge and estrous behavior (experiment I) and to dissociate the roles of quantity and duration of presence of E2 as administered by implants (experiment II). Increasing the dose of E2 in both experiment I and experiment II decreased the latency to onset of both the LH surge and the receptivity. The duration of E2 presence marginally affected the latency of both responses and the duration of the LH surge. By contrast, the duration of receptivity depended largely on the duration of E2 presence (experiment II: r = 0.569, P < 0.01). This result explains the dose-duration effect mentioned previously in the literature and found in experiment I. The maximum response increased with dose in both experiment I and experiment II for receptivity and only in experiment I for the LH surge. We conclude that, at estrus, E2 acts in a similar fashion to induce receptive behavior and the LH surge but controls the maximum levels and the duration of these endocrine and behavioral responses differently.

When estrous behavior is induced in ovariectomized ewes by subjecting them to progestagen priming followed by a dose of estrogen large enough to guarantee estrus in all animals, an abnormally long period of estrus in induced, suggesting that the regime of steroid replacement needs modification. Using quantitative tests for proceptivity and receptivity, we studied the patterns of sexual behavior of intact ewes and then attempted to reproduce them in the same animals after they had been ovariectomized. We used various combinations of exogenous estrogen, androgen, and progestagen and compared the behavioral responses with an endocrine response, the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH). In intact ewes, sexual behavior and the LH surge were closely synchronized and their characteristics differed slightly between the middle and the end of the breeding season. Proceptive behavior was not greatly affected by the frequency of tests, but the duration of receptivity was significantly reduced by frequent testing. In ovariectomized ewes, we found that: (a) progesterone priming is essential for normal patterns of receptive and proceptive behavior, and for synchronizing the behavioral and endocrine responses to estrogen; (b) androgens do not play a major role in the control of either receptive or proceptive behavior; and (c) the inclusion of a low dose of estrogen with the progestagen in the 'priming' regime improves the responses to estradiol-17 beta. Under these conditions, the timing, intensity and duration of the behavior are very close to those observed in the same ewes when they were intact and cycling spontaneously.