Search

A total of 195 children (117 males and 78 females) with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (IGHD), treated with growth hormone (GH) for at least 1 year before puberty onset and who had completed tre

Background/Aims: We investigated whether genetic or maternal/environmental risk factors for being born small for gestational age (SGA), e.g. Silver-Russell syndrome, congenital heart defects, infections of mothers or smoking during pregnancy, explain the variation in the first-year growth response to GH therapy. Methods: Secondary analysis was made of growth response in 135 short prepubertal German children (66% males) enrolled in a SGA phase III trial. Initial mean patient age was 6.8 ± 2.6 years; mean patient height SDS –3.8 ± 1.2, and GH treatment dose was 0.066 mg/kg body weight per day. Results: Growth velocity increased by 4.5 ± 2.0 cm/year and height SDS by 1.0 ± 0.5 SDS. Although patient number was limited and variation was high, both growth response (cm/year) and change in height SDS did not appear to differ between subgroups which also did not differ in terms of Studentized residuals set up in the KIGS growth prediction model for SGA. Likewise, in a step-forward multivariate analysis, the variables Silver-Russell syndrome, congenital heart defects, infections of mothers and smoking were not identified as independent factors influencing growth velocity. Conclusion: The retrospectively analyzed genetic and maternal/environmental risk factors for SGA do not appear to explain the observed patient variance in response to GH. Larger prospective studies are needed, however, to substantiate these preliminary findings.

Aim: To develop methods to identify factors associated with a favorable outcome in GH-treated children with idiopathic short stature (ISS). Methods: From 4,685 children listed as having ISS within KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database), we studied (a) the prediction model group (n = 657) to develop the first-year prediction model, and (b) the near adult height group (NAH; n = 256) which received GH for >4 years to develop descriptive models for adult height and overall height gain. Results: NAH group at GH start: age was 10.0 years, height –2.5 SD score (SDS), weight –2.3 SDS, height minus mid-parental height (MPH) –1.5 SDS; GH dose 0.19 mg/kg/week. Height gain was 1.1 SDS at a median age of 17.2 years. Growth response correlated positively with GH dose and weight at the start of GH treatment, and negatively with age and height SDS minus MPH SDS. The model explains 39% (error SD 1.2 cm) of the variability. Adult height correlated (R2 = 0.64) positively with height at GH start, MPH and the first-year responsiveness to GH, and negatively with age. Conclusions: Prepubertal children with ISS who show an appropriate first-year response to GH are likely to benefit from long-term treatment, even on low GH dosages.

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency in children covers a spectrum of disorders involving an impairment in GH secretion and a clinical syndrome characterized by permanent stunting of growth. Ascertaining impairments in GH secretion directly is complex, especially if GH deficiency (GHD) is isolated and not caused by congenital or acquired pituitary defects or genetic abnormalities. It has been established that the concentrations of GH-dependent peptides, such as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), are low in patients with GHD. Their levels are, however, also influenced by a multitude of factors, such as age, gender, height, liver function, nutritional status and other hormones. In addition, the type of complex formed, e.g. either binary or ternary, may influence the measurements of IGFs and their binding proteins. Therefore, levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are generally lower in short children compared with age-matched norms. The reported diagnostic value of sub-normal basal levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 is, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, approximately 70%. Thus, definite proof of GHD can only be achieved by means of GH measurements. As the diagnosis of GHD is somewhat unlikely if IGF testing shows normal values, it is clearly advantageous to schedule these tests as part of the initial diagnostic work-up in short children, as their implementation is not only practical but also inexpensive. The Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) analysis of IGF-I (n = 2,750) and IGFBP-3 (n = 1,300) levels in children with idiopathic GHD shows that these two parameters are now firmly embedded in diagnostic strategies around the world.

Background: Medulloblastoma is the most frequent primary solid central nervous system tumour in children. The 5-year survival rate is at present at about 60%. Height in general is severely compromised in survivors. The present study is an extension of the investigation by the author’s group of the effect of exogenous growth hormone (GH) among medulloblastoma patients. Methods: A total of 113 patients with medulloblastoma (out of 682 cases documented in KIGS, Pfizer International Growth Database) were treated with GH till final height was achieved. At the start of GH therapy (median dose 0.18 mg/kg/week), patients were 8.9 years old and had a median height SDS of –1.6. Results: After 6.8 years of GH, final height SDS was –1.9, reflecting an overall loss in height of 0.3 SDS. This contrasted with an age-matched group of patients with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (iGHD, n = 1,986), whose gain in height was 1.6 SDS on the same dose. The index of responsiveness averaged –0.9 during the first prepubertal year and –2.0 during total pubertal growth, thus indicating a major impairment in responsiveness to GH as compared to iGHD. Height at GH start, which correlated positively with the age at disease onset, was found to be the major determinant of final height. Conclusions: Our findings show that attempts to improve the height outcome in medulloblastoma must involve earlier recognition and treatment with higher-than-replacement doses of GH; additionally, modifications in cancer treatment programs need to be considered, such as lowering the dose of craniospinal irradiation or avoiding it as far as possible.

Background/Aims: The beneficial effects of growth hormone (GH) therapy on statural growth in children are well established, but the effects on skeletal maturation are less clear. The progression of bone age (BA) was therefore studied during the first year of GH treatment in pre-pubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency (GHD), Turner syndrome (TS) or idiopathic short stature (ISS), and in short pre-pubertal children born small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Cross-sectional data on 2,209 short children with idiopathic GHD, 694 with TS, 569 with ISS and 153 with SGA were analysed. Longitudinal data were also analysed from 308 children with idiopathic GHD, 99 with TS, 57 with ISS and 29 with SGA. All patients included in the study were enrolled in KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) and were being treated with recombinant human GH (Genotropin®). BA was assessed using the Greulich and Pyle method at baseline and after 1 year of GH therapy. Results: In all groups of patients the mean progression of BA was 1 year during the year of GH therapy, although there was considerable individual variation. Progression of BA was not correlated with chronological age, BA, height SD score (SDS) or body mass index SDS at the onset of GH therapy. There was also no consistent effect of the GH dose on BA progression. Conclusion: Progression of BA appears to be normal in patients receiving GH in these diagnostic groups, at least over the first year of treatment in pre-puberty.

Although recombinant techniques have enabled the production of limitless amounts of human growth hormone (GH), and clinical methods for diagnosis and treatment have been greatly enhanced, the mean final heights of children with idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD) treated with GH remain in the range of –1.3 standard deviation scores (SDS) below normal height. One of the methods used to increase height outcomes is to delay the onset and progression of puberty to allow for a longer ‘pre-pubertal’ growth phase. We reviewed the KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database) data of patients with IGHD who had been treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) in order to see if a greater gain in height could be achieved by altering the tempo of pubertal maturation. Near-final height data were analysed in 39 adolescents (out of a total of 249) who had received GH + GnRHa therapy and were compared with similar data from 1,893 patients with IGHD treated with GH alone. The total change in height SDS in boys who received GH alone was +1.6, in contrast to +1.1 in GH + GnRHa-treated boys; the total change in height SDS in girls who received GH alone was +1.4 in contrast to +1.1 in girls treated with GH + GnRHa. The near final height SDS in girls treated with GH + GnRHa was 1.0 below the mid-parental target height (MPH), whereas there was only a –0.5 SDS difference in girls treated with GH. Approximation to the MPH did not differ in boys between the two treatment groups. These data suggest that the attainment of a substantial height SDS by manipulating the tempo of puberty is limited, but that optimizing growth during the pre-pubertal phase is a more important factor.

Background: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment on testicular development in boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) followed in the KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database). Methods: For inclusion in the study, the patients had to have received more than 1 year of prepubertal GH treatment, at least 4 consecutive years of GH treatment in total, and to have attained their final height, defined as a height velocity of less than 2 cm/year. Data on 107 boys in the KIGS database have been analyzed. Results: No significant differences in duration of GH treatment and testicular volume at the start of treatment or at final height were found between the boys with ISS and those with IGHD. The progression of testicular volume in boys with ISS or IGHD during GH treatment did not differ from the reference population. Conclusions: This analysis shows that GH treatment does not alter testicular growth in boys with ISS or IGHD. However, prospective controlled studies are needed to rule out moderate attenuating or stimulating effects.