Search

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: By today's standard, the optimal treatment of every individual tumor patient is discussed and determined in an interdisciplinary tumor board. According to the new S3 guidelines, larger volume T3 laryngeal cancers which are no longer safely resectable with larynx-sparing surgery are ideal candidates for a larynx preservation approach using primary chemoradiation (pCRT). So far, no clear criteria have been defined under what circumstances primary radiotherapy alone (pRT) might be acceptable in case chemotherapy (CT) is prohibited or in what cases, even in T3, upfront total laryngectomy with risk-adapted adjuvant treatment (TL±a[C]RT) should be recommended., Method: The literature was searched for parameters chosen as criteria for an inclusion in the surgical rather than the conservative arm in non-randomized LP studies or which proved to be significant prognostic markers after conservative treatment. Development of a counselling tool for therapeutic decision making., Results: Significant prognostic markers were tumor volume (< 3.5 ccm/< 6 ccm vs. 6-12 ccm vs. > 12 ccm), presence and kind of vocal cord fixation (none vs. Succo I/II vs. Succo III/IV), extent of cartilage infiltration (none vs. minimal vs. multiple/gross), nodal status (N0‑1 vs. N2-3), and laryngeal dysfunction (pretreatment necessity of feeding tube or tracheostomy)., Conclusion: For T3 laryngeal cancers, pRT could be acceptable when the tumor volume is < 3.5 ccm for glottic and < 6 ccm for supraglottic tumors and there are no further risk factors. pCRT can be regarded as the standard for LP for tumors between 6 ccm and 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern I/II, only minimal cartilage infiltration and a high nodal burden. For tumor > 12 ccm, vocal cord fixation Succo pattern III/IV, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration or clinically relevant laryngeal dysfunction, upfront TL±a[C]RT should be considered., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Could primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) possibly be viewed as an alternative standard therapy to upfront total laryngectomy (TL)? According to the new German S3 guideline, despite higher rates of local recurrence, there would be no survival disadvantage and salvage surgery would be a curative option. In several large database studies and case series, statistically significant survival disadvantages of more than 30% between pCRT and TL have been reported for T4 laryngeal cancer. According to the literature, the success rate of salvage TL for T4 laryngeal cancer is only about 25-50%. Larynx preservation (LP) studies which could qualify the recommendation of pCRT as an alternative standard therapy to TL in T4 carcinomas should 1) evaluate T4a cancers within the T4 category; 2) perform subgroup analysis of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers; 3) be sufficiently highly powered; 4) provide long-term outcomes of at least 5 years; 5) with oncological and 6) functional outcomes (duration of the need for tracheostomy and/or feeding tube dependency; necessity and success of salvage laryngectomies). 7) Specification of the criteria of the respective T4 classification (invasion through the outer cortex of the cartilage, or infiltration of which extralaryngeal structures) and 8) evaluation of pretreatment laryngeal function (at least: tracheostomy, feeding tube dependency). Collection of all the aforementioned data of T4 patients treated with pCRT in a large prospective observational cohort study in German-speaking countries is suggested. In case of rejection of TL by T4 laryngeal cancer patients, differentiation between primary spontaneous reluctance and a definitive, carefully considered decision is important. This distinction should be achieved by sensitive discussions. Not only oncological but also functional outcome probabilities should be included in the overall decision-making process., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The carcinoid tumor of the middle ear is a very rare neoplasm which in general is regarded as benign but may be mistaken for an adenocarcinoma because of its histological heterogeneity. Typical, however, is its neuroendocrine and mucinous differentiation so that an unequivocal diagnosis is possible by means of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. As the tumor is very rare, there is no statistical evidence as to whether further treatment is necessary after primary exstirpation of the tumor. Therefore, a review of the literature was performed. We report about a 28-year-old male patient with a carcinoid tumor of the left tympanic cavity. Without any further treatment there has been no evidence for either recurrence or metastases 32 months after surgical resection. As treatment of choice we recommend conservative surgery with complete removal of the tumor and a clinical follow-up on a regular basis.

Especially after prolonged antibiotic ototopic therapy otomycosis is not rare. An inoculation of fungi into the tympanic cavity however may have serious sequelae. Therefore an eradication of fungi from the external auditory canal is imperative before surgery. In addition to thorough cleaning of the outer ear canal antimycotic preparations are recommended in treating otomycosis. However, all of the commercially available ear drops contain ototoxic agents. In the case of defects of the tympanic membrane a damage of the inner ear may result. Alternatively, we suggest an aqueous solution of Miconazol 0,5%.