Search

Aims Methods and results Conclusion Chondromyxoid fibroma (CMF) is a rare, benign bone tumour which arises primarily in young adults and is occasionally diagnostically challenging. Glutamate metabotropic receptor 1 (GRM1) gene encodes a metabotropic glutamate receptor and was recently shown to be up‐regulated in chondromyxoid fibroma through gene fusion and promoter swapping. The aim of this study was to interrogate cases of CMF for the presence of GRM1 gene rearrangements, gene fusions and GRM1 protein overexpression.Selected cases were subjected to testing by fluorescent in‐situ hybridisation (FISH) with a GRM1 break‐apart probe, a targeted RNA sequencing method and immunohistochemical study with an antibody to GRM1 protein. Two cases were subjected to whole transcriptomic sequencing. In 13 of 13 cases, GRM1 protein overexpression was detected by immunohistochemistry using the GRM1 antibody. Of the 12 cases successfully tested by FISH, nine of 12 showed GRM1 rearrangements by break‐apart probe assay. Targeted RNA sequencing analysis did not detect gene fusions in any of the eight cases tested, but there was an increase in GRM1 mRNA expression in all eight cases. Two cases subjected to whole transcriptomic sequencing (WTS) showed elevated GRM1 expression and no gene fusions.GRM1 gene rearrangements can be detected using FISH break‐apart probes in approximately 75% of cases, and immunohistochemical detection of GRM1 protein over‐expression is a sensitive diagnostic method. The gene fusion was not detected by targeted RNA sequencing, due most probably to the complexity of fusion mechanism, and is not yet a reliable method for confirming a diagnosis of CMF in the clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods and results Conclusions CIC‐rearranged sarcomas (CRS) are clinically aggressive undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (URCS), commonly driven by CIC::DUX4. Due to the repetitive nature of DUX4 and the variability of the fusion breakpoints, CIC::DUX4 fusion may be missed by molecular testing. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains have been studied as surrogates for the CIC::DUX4 fusion. We aim to assess the performance of DUX4 IHC in the work‐up of CRS and its expression in non‐CRS round cell or epithelioid neoplasms.Cases of molecularly confirmed CRS (n = 48) and non‐CRS (n = 105) were included. CRS cases consisted of 35 females and 13 males, with ages ranging from less than 1 year to 67 years (median = 41 years). Among the molecularly confirmed non‐CRS cases, C‐terminal DUX4 expression was investigated in Ewing sarcomas (38 cases), alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (18 cases), desmoplastic small round cell tumours (12 cases) and synovial sarcomas (n = five), as well as in non‐mesenchymal neoplasms such as SMARCA4/SMARCB1‐deficient tumours (n = five), carcinomas of unknown primary (n = three) and haematolymphoid neoplasms (four cases). DUX4 IHC was considered positive when strong nuclear expression was detected in more than 50% of neoplastic cells. When used as a surrogate for the diagnosis of CRS, the sensitivity and specificity of DUX4 IHC was 98 and 100%, respectively. Only one CRS case was negative for DUX4 IHC and harboured a CIC::FOXO4 fusion.DUX4 IHC is a highly sensitive and specific surrogate marker for the presence of CIC::DUX4 fusion, demonstrating its utility in establishing a diagnosis of CRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]