Search

This paper aims to re-examine the effects of funding on university autonomy since the relationship between university autonomy and funding is likely to be interpreted as a linear effect; namely, the more funding the greater autonomy. Such a simplistic vision is less than complete since it ignores the complicated nature of university autonomy. The nature of the latter should be defined contextually and politically. Its interpretation should also be placed in the changing government-university relationships. This paper argues that the effect of funding on university autonomy is conditioned by the nature of university autonomy in a given country. While university autonomy involves more than a financial tie, greater efforts on the part of universities to diversify their funding bases may well not enhance, at least directly, their autonomy. Through an extensive literature review, and empirical studies conducted in England and Taiwan, the argument of this paper is supported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In response to the global competitiveness in higher education, the government, in recent years, has encouraged Taiwan colleges and universities to seek international accreditation, which raises several questions, such as jurisdiction over national accreditation, a single set of standards for local and global quality assurance, demand for the mutual recognition of review outcomes, etc. With the looming pressures for change that international accreditation will likely pose on a Taiwan national framework of quality assurance, multiple impacts on institutions and national accrediting agencies in Taiwan are now beginning to be increasingly felt. Hence, this paper examines current academic international accreditation programs and institutions, recognizes Taiwan's accrediting organizations, and analyzes the challenges that institutions and national accrediting agencies are facing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]