Search

Purpose: The Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) proposed a ventral hernia grading guideline, primarily supported by expert opinion, recommending biologic mesh placement in high-risk patients. We investigated the relationship between this industry-sponsored guideline and discourse around ventral hernia repair (VHR).Medline platform from Web of Science’s database identified publications “pre-VHWG”(1999-01-01 to 2009-12-31), and “post-VHWG”(2010-01-01 to 2020-12-31) describing VHR and complications or recurrence of VHR with the following comorbidities: COPD, smoking, diabetes, immunosuppression, or obesity. Poisson regression analyzed keyword frequency over time using logarithmically transformed data.Of 1291 VHR publications identified pre-VHWG and 3041 publications identified post-VHWG, 172 (13.3%) and 642 (21.1%) publications respectively included prespecified keywords. The keyword groups “biologic”(IRR 3.39,95%CI1.34-11.4,p = 0.022) and “comorbid”(IRR 1.95, 95%CI1.09-3.74,p = 0.033) significantly increased with frequency after publication of the VHWG.The VHWG publication likely contributed to a focus on comorbidities and biologic mesh in the ensuing literature within the field of VHR.Methods: The Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) proposed a ventral hernia grading guideline, primarily supported by expert opinion, recommending biologic mesh placement in high-risk patients. We investigated the relationship between this industry-sponsored guideline and discourse around ventral hernia repair (VHR).Medline platform from Web of Science’s database identified publications “pre-VHWG”(1999-01-01 to 2009-12-31), and “post-VHWG”(2010-01-01 to 2020-12-31) describing VHR and complications or recurrence of VHR with the following comorbidities: COPD, smoking, diabetes, immunosuppression, or obesity. Poisson regression analyzed keyword frequency over time using logarithmically transformed data.Of 1291 VHR publications identified pre-VHWG and 3041 publications identified post-VHWG, 172 (13.3%) and 642 (21.1%) publications respectively included prespecified keywords. The keyword groups “biologic”(IRR 3.39,95%CI1.34-11.4,p = 0.022) and “comorbid”(IRR 1.95, 95%CI1.09-3.74,p = 0.033) significantly increased with frequency after publication of the VHWG.The VHWG publication likely contributed to a focus on comorbidities and biologic mesh in the ensuing literature within the field of VHR.Results: The Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) proposed a ventral hernia grading guideline, primarily supported by expert opinion, recommending biologic mesh placement in high-risk patients. We investigated the relationship between this industry-sponsored guideline and discourse around ventral hernia repair (VHR).Medline platform from Web of Science’s database identified publications “pre-VHWG”(1999-01-01 to 2009-12-31), and “post-VHWG”(2010-01-01 to 2020-12-31) describing VHR and complications or recurrence of VHR with the following comorbidities: COPD, smoking, diabetes, immunosuppression, or obesity. Poisson regression analyzed keyword frequency over time using logarithmically transformed data.Of 1291 VHR publications identified pre-VHWG and 3041 publications identified post-VHWG, 172 (13.3%) and 642 (21.1%) publications respectively included prespecified keywords. The keyword groups “biologic”(IRR 3.39,95%CI1.34-11.4,p = 0.022) and “comorbid”(IRR 1.95, 95%CI1.09-3.74,p = 0.033) significantly increased with frequency after publication of the VHWG.The VHWG publication likely contributed to a focus on comorbidities and biologic mesh in the ensuing literature within the field of VHR.Conclusion: The Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) proposed a ventral hernia grading guideline, primarily supported by expert opinion, recommending biologic mesh placement in high-risk patients. We investigated the relationship between this industry-sponsored guideline and discourse around ventral hernia repair (VHR).Medline platform from Web of Science’s database identified publications “pre-VHWG”(1999-01-01 to 2009-12-31), and “post-VHWG”(2010-01-01 to 2020-12-31) describing VHR and complications or recurrence of VHR with the following comorbidities: COPD, smoking, diabetes, immunosuppression, or obesity. Poisson regression analyzed keyword frequency over time using logarithmically transformed data.Of 1291 VHR publications identified pre-VHWG and 3041 publications identified post-VHWG, 172 (13.3%) and 642 (21.1%) publications respectively included prespecified keywords. The keyword groups “biologic”(IRR 3.39,95%CI1.34-11.4,p = 0.022) and “comorbid”(IRR 1.95, 95%CI1.09-3.74,p = 0.033) significantly increased with frequency after publication of the VHWG.The VHWG publication likely contributed to a focus on comorbidities and biologic mesh in the ensuing literature within the field of VHR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.Methods: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.Results: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.Conclusion: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.Trial registration: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Numerous studies have identified diabetes mellites (DM) as a significant risk factor for postoperative wound morbidity, with suboptimal preoperative glycemic control (GC) posing an even greater risk. However, this data largely excludes ventral hernia patients. Our study examined the association between diabetes and preoperative GC and postoperative outcomes following open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).We identified diabetic patients who had undergone open, elective, clean VHR with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and permanent synthetic mesh at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 2014 and December 2023. Their 30-day outcomes were compared to non-diabetic patients undergoing the same procedure. Subsequently, diabetic patients were categorized based on GC. status: “Optimal GC” (HbA1c < 7%), “Sub-optimal GC” (HbA1c 7-8.4%), and “Poor GC” (HbA1c ≥ 8.5%) and their outcomes were compared.514 patients with DM who underwent clean elective TAR were identified, of which 431 met the inclusion criteria. GC was deemed optimal in 255 patients, sub-optimal in 128, and poor in 48 patients. Demographics were similar, except for anticoagulation treatment (p = 0.014). The entire study population exhibited significantly higher rates of wound morbidities and overall complications compared to non-diabetic patients. However, rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and reoperation did not differ significantly among the three cohorts of presurgical glycemic control (p = 0.82, p = 0.46, p = 0.51, p = 0.78), respectively. No occurrence of mesh removal was documented.In general, diabetes is a marker for increased wound morbidity and complications following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. However, we could not establish a hard cutoff to justify withholding surgery in symptomatic patients based on an arbitrary HbA1C level. We believe this data is important for shared decision-making when considering AWR for symptomatic ventral hernias in diabetic patients.Methods: Numerous studies have identified diabetes mellites (DM) as a significant risk factor for postoperative wound morbidity, with suboptimal preoperative glycemic control (GC) posing an even greater risk. However, this data largely excludes ventral hernia patients. Our study examined the association between diabetes and preoperative GC and postoperative outcomes following open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).We identified diabetic patients who had undergone open, elective, clean VHR with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and permanent synthetic mesh at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 2014 and December 2023. Their 30-day outcomes were compared to non-diabetic patients undergoing the same procedure. Subsequently, diabetic patients were categorized based on GC. status: “Optimal GC” (HbA1c < 7%), “Sub-optimal GC” (HbA1c 7-8.4%), and “Poor GC” (HbA1c ≥ 8.5%) and their outcomes were compared.514 patients with DM who underwent clean elective TAR were identified, of which 431 met the inclusion criteria. GC was deemed optimal in 255 patients, sub-optimal in 128, and poor in 48 patients. Demographics were similar, except for anticoagulation treatment (p = 0.014). The entire study population exhibited significantly higher rates of wound morbidities and overall complications compared to non-diabetic patients. However, rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and reoperation did not differ significantly among the three cohorts of presurgical glycemic control (p = 0.82, p = 0.46, p = 0.51, p = 0.78), respectively. No occurrence of mesh removal was documented.In general, diabetes is a marker for increased wound morbidity and complications following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. However, we could not establish a hard cutoff to justify withholding surgery in symptomatic patients based on an arbitrary HbA1C level. We believe this data is important for shared decision-making when considering AWR for symptomatic ventral hernias in diabetic patients.Results: Numerous studies have identified diabetes mellites (DM) as a significant risk factor for postoperative wound morbidity, with suboptimal preoperative glycemic control (GC) posing an even greater risk. However, this data largely excludes ventral hernia patients. Our study examined the association between diabetes and preoperative GC and postoperative outcomes following open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).We identified diabetic patients who had undergone open, elective, clean VHR with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and permanent synthetic mesh at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 2014 and December 2023. Their 30-day outcomes were compared to non-diabetic patients undergoing the same procedure. Subsequently, diabetic patients were categorized based on GC. status: “Optimal GC” (HbA1c < 7%), “Sub-optimal GC” (HbA1c 7-8.4%), and “Poor GC” (HbA1c ≥ 8.5%) and their outcomes were compared.514 patients with DM who underwent clean elective TAR were identified, of which 431 met the inclusion criteria. GC was deemed optimal in 255 patients, sub-optimal in 128, and poor in 48 patients. Demographics were similar, except for anticoagulation treatment (p = 0.014). The entire study population exhibited significantly higher rates of wound morbidities and overall complications compared to non-diabetic patients. However, rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and reoperation did not differ significantly among the three cohorts of presurgical glycemic control (p = 0.82, p = 0.46, p = 0.51, p = 0.78), respectively. No occurrence of mesh removal was documented.In general, diabetes is a marker for increased wound morbidity and complications following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. However, we could not establish a hard cutoff to justify withholding surgery in symptomatic patients based on an arbitrary HbA1C level. We believe this data is important for shared decision-making when considering AWR for symptomatic ventral hernias in diabetic patients.Conclusion: Numerous studies have identified diabetes mellites (DM) as a significant risk factor for postoperative wound morbidity, with suboptimal preoperative glycemic control (GC) posing an even greater risk. However, this data largely excludes ventral hernia patients. Our study examined the association between diabetes and preoperative GC and postoperative outcomes following open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).We identified diabetic patients who had undergone open, elective, clean VHR with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and permanent synthetic mesh at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between January 2014 and December 2023. Their 30-day outcomes were compared to non-diabetic patients undergoing the same procedure. Subsequently, diabetic patients were categorized based on GC. status: “Optimal GC” (HbA1c < 7%), “Sub-optimal GC” (HbA1c 7-8.4%), and “Poor GC” (HbA1c ≥ 8.5%) and their outcomes were compared.514 patients with DM who underwent clean elective TAR were identified, of which 431 met the inclusion criteria. GC was deemed optimal in 255 patients, sub-optimal in 128, and poor in 48 patients. Demographics were similar, except for anticoagulation treatment (p = 0.014). The entire study population exhibited significantly higher rates of wound morbidities and overall complications compared to non-diabetic patients. However, rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and reoperation did not differ significantly among the three cohorts of presurgical glycemic control (p = 0.82, p = 0.46, p = 0.51, p = 0.78), respectively. No occurrence of mesh removal was documented.In general, diabetes is a marker for increased wound morbidity and complications following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. However, we could not establish a hard cutoff to justify withholding surgery in symptomatic patients based on an arbitrary HbA1C level. We believe this data is important for shared decision-making when considering AWR for symptomatic ventral hernias in diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]