Search

Purpose: Concordance is an important dimension of the physician-patient relationship that may be linked to health care disparities. The purpose of this study was to determine if sex discordance between surgeon and patient impacts surgical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry was performed on all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair. Surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) and 30-day readmission rates were recorded. Results: Female patients operated on by male surgeons have increased odds of having an SSI/SSO (OR 1.099, 95% CI 1.022–1.181), SSOPI (OR 1.156, 95% CI 1.031–1.297), and readmission (OR 1.259, 95% CI 1.128–1.406) when compared to male patients operated on by male surgeons. There was no significant difference in adverse outcomes between patient groups when operated on by female surgeons. Conclusion: Sex discordance between surgeon and patient is associated with increased odds adverse outcomes when male surgeons operate on female patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Parastomal hernias (PSH) are the most common complication of stoma creation and can cause significant morbidity. We present a consecutive series of patients receiving prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) for prevention of PSH.Methods: This retrospective review evaluates the efficacy and outcomes of PMA for PSH prevention, and retrospectively compares traditional keyhole PMA (tPMA) (n = 28) with a prophylactic Stapled Ostomy Reinforcement with Retromuscular Mesh technique (pSTORRM) (n = 24).Results: PMA was performed in 52 cases between January 2015 and July 2018. All cases used a large-pore, non-coated, mid-weight polypropylene mesh placed in the retrorectus space. With a median follow-up of 16 mos, parastomal hernia was confirmed in 11.5% (n = 6), 5 of whom were symptomatic. patient-reported outcomes (PRO) indicated 6 additional patients with symptoms associated with PSH without clinical or radiographic confirmation. Patients had similar comorbidities and operative characteristics between tPMA and pSTORRM techniques, and no difference in a median follow-up. pSTORRM patients had fewer surgical site infections (8.3 vs 32.1%; p = 0.046) and occurrences (12.5 vs 46.4%; p = 0.015), and lower rate of PSH, though not statistically significant (4.2 vs 17.9%; p = 0.195).Conclusion: Permanent synthetic mesh placed as a sublay in the retromuscular space is safe and appears to decrease the risk of PSH formation after the creation of permanent stomas. A stapled technique may provide advantages over a traditional keyhole technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Currently, the need for additional myofascial release (AMR) in addition to retromuscular dissection during open Rives–Stoppa hernia repair is determined intraoperatively based on the discretion of the surgeon. We developed a novel method to objectively predict the need for AMR preoperatively using computed tomography (CT)-measured rectus width to hernia width ratio (RDR). Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent open retro-muscular mesh repair of midline ventral hernia between August 1, 2007 and February 1, 2018, who had a preoperative CT scan within 1 year prior to their operation. The primary endpoint was the ability of the defect ratio to predict the need for AMR in pursuit of fascial closure. The secondary endpoint was the ability of Component Separation Index (CSI) to predict the need for AMR to obtain fascial closure. Results: Of 342 patients, 208 repaired with rectus abdominis release alone (RM group), while 134 required AMR (RM + group). An RDR of > 1.34 on area under the curve analysis predicted the need for AMR with 77.6% accuracy. There was a linear decrease in the need for AMR with increasing RDR: RDR < 1 required AMR in 78.8% of cases, RDR 1.1–1.49 in 52%, RDR 1.5–1.99 in 32.1%, and RDR > 2 in just 10.8%. Similarly, CSI > 0.146 predicted the need for AMR with 76.3% accuracy on area under the curve analysis. Conclusion: The RDR is a practical and reliable tool to predict the ability to close the defect during open Rives–Stoppa ventral hernia repair without AMR. An RDR of > 2 portends fascial closure with rectus abdominis myofascial release alone in 90% of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]