Search

Variants in the precore (G(1896)A) and core promoter (A(1762)T, G(1764)A) regions of hepatitis B virus (HBV) may be related to serum HBV DNA levels and severity of liver disease. The aims of this nationwide study were to determine the prevalence of HBV precore/core promoter variants in the United States and the association between these variants and patient demographics, HBV genotypes, serum HBV DNA level, and severity of liver disease. A total of 694 consecutive chronic HBV-infected patients seen in 17 U.S. liver centers during a 1-year period were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Sera were tested for HBV genotypes as well as precore and core promoter variants by line-probe assays. Quantitative HBV DNA levels were determined using Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor kits. Precore and core promoter variants were found in 27% and 44% of patients with chronic HBV infection in the United States. Precore and core promoter variants were more common in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative than in HBeAg-positive patients (precore, 38% vs. 9%; core promoter, 51% vs. 36%; respectively, P <.001). The prevalence of these variants was related to ethnicity, place of birth, and HBV genotypes. Patients with core promoter variants were more likely to have hepatic decompensation. Precore and/or core promoter variants were associated with higher serum HBV DNA levels in HBeAg-negative but not in HBeAg-positive patients. In conclusion, HBV precore and core promoter variants are not rare in the United States. Physicians should be aware of the existence of HBV precore and core promoter variants and the clinical condition of "HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis."

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype and precore/core promoter mutations have been implicated in spontaneous and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)-related hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. We performed a retrospective analysis of a previously reported randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of HBV genotype and precore/core promoter mutations on IFN-alpha response in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis. Clinical data and stored sera from 109 (95%) patients in the original trial were analyzed. Seventy-three patients received IFN-alpha and 34 received no treatment (controls). Almost all patients had HBV genotypes B (38%) and C (60%). Antiviral response was achieved in 39% and 17% of IFN-alpha-treated patients (P =.03) and in 10% and 8% of untreated controls (P =.88) with HBV genotype B and C, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified HBV genotype B, elevated pretreatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and low pretreatment HBV-DNA levels but not IFN-alpha treatment as independent factors associated with antiviral response. Among the 66 patients with elevated pretreatment ALT level, antiviral response was achieved in 57% and 21% of IFN-alpha-treated patients (P =.019), and in 25% and 8% of untreated controls (P =.45) with HBV genotype B and C, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that genotype B and low pretreatment HBV-DNA levels were independent predictors of antiviral response. In conclusion, our data showed that HBV genotype B was associated with a higher rate of IFN-induced HBeAg clearance compared with genotype C. Stratification for HBV genotypes should be considered in future clinical trials of antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B.

The goals of this retrospective study were to determine whether there is a threshold hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA value associated with spontaneous or antiviral therapy-related hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance. We also investigated whether there is an HBV DNA value that can be used for differentiating inactive carriers from patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. HBV DNA levels in sequential serum samples of 165 Chinese patients with different stages of chronic HBV infection were quantified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay. Our results showed that almost all of the patients (89%) who remained HBeAg-positive had HBV DNA levels that were persistently above 10(5) copies/mL. Serum HBV DNA levels decreased by a mean of 3 log(10) in patients with HBeAg loss, but 51% had levels above 10(5) copies/mL at the time HBeAg first became undetectable. Mean serum HBV DNA levels were significantly lower in HBeAg-negative patients. HBV DNA value above 10(5) copies/mL would exclude all inactive carriers, but 45% of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis would also be excluded if testing were only performed at presentation and 30% would be excluded if testing were performed on 3 occasions. In conclusion, serum HBV DNA levels decreased significantly in patients with HBeAg loss, but there was no threshold HBV DNA level associated with HBeAg clearance. Given the fluctuating course of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis, it is not possible to define a single cutoff HBV DNA value for differentiating inactive carriers from patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis.

Portal hypertension is associated with increased hepatic and collateral resistance to an increased portal blood flow. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) can induce intrahepatic vasoconstriction and consequently increase portal pressure. It is unknown if ET-1 also modulates portal pressure by a direct vasoconstrictive effect on collaterals. This study investigated the collateral vascular responses to ET-1, the receptors in mediation, and the regulation of ET-1 action by nitric oxide and prostaglandin. The portal-systemic collaterals of partially portal vein-ligated rats were tested by in situ perfusion. The concentration-response curves of collaterals to graded concentrations of ET-1 (10(-10)-10(-7) mol/L) with or without BQ-123 (ET(A) receptor antagonist, 2 x 10(-6) mol/L), BQ-788 (ET(B) receptor antagonist, 10(-7) mol/L) or both were recorded. In addition, the collateral responses to ET-1 with preincubation of n(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (NNA; 100 mol/L), indomethacin (INDO; 10 mol/L), or in combination were performed. ET-1 increased the perfusion pressure of collaterals and its effect was significantly suppressed by BQ-123 alone and BQ-123 plus BQ-788, but not BQ-788 alone (P <.05). Incubation with NNA, INDO, or both significantly enhanced the response of collaterals to ET-1 (P < .05). These results show that ET-1 produces a direct vasoconstrictive effect on the collateral vessels of portal hypertensive rats. This effect is mediated by ET(A,) but not ET(B), receptors. Both nitric oxide and prostaglandin modulate the collateral vascular response to ET-1 and may therefore participate in the development and maintenance of portal hypertension.

This study investigated the effect of vasopressin on portal-systemic collaterals in portal hypertensive rats and the influence of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin on the responsiveness of collateral vessels to vasopressin. The vascular responsiveness to graded concentrations of vasopressin was tested with or without the incubation of n(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (NNA) (100 micromol/L) and/or indomethacin (10 micromol/L) in perfused collateral vascular beds of rats with portal hypertension induced by partial portal vein ligation. In addition, concentration-response curves to vasopressin with incubation of a vasopressin V(1) receptor antagonist d(CH(2))(5)Tyr(Me) arginine vasopressin and concentration-response curves to a V(2) receptor agonist 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin were performed. Vasopressin significantly increased the perfusion pressure of collaterals, and this effect was suppressed by the addition of the V(1) receptor antagonist. Perfusion with the V(2) receptor agonist had no effect on the collaterals. Incubation with NNA, indomethacin, or both significantly potentiated the response of collaterals to vasopressin. In addition, the pressor response to vasopressin in the combination group was significantly higher than that in the NNA-alone group. The results show that vasopressin produces a direct vasoconstrictive effect on the portal-systemic collaterals of portal hypertensive rats. This effect is mediated by the vasopressin V(1,) but not V(2), receptors. The attenuation of the response to vasopressin by NO and prostaglandin suggest a function role of both mediators in the regulation of the portal-systemic collateral circulation in portal hypertensive rats.