Search

Background/aims: To explore the effect of prophylactic hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on survival probability after curative resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methodology: 85 patients with HCC were randomly assigned to HAIC group (42 cases) and control group (43 patients), all the database of two groups had no significant difference. Patients in HAIC groups underwent hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 and Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) starting 3 weeks after operation with intervals of 4 weeks. All patients were followed up for 3 years and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate were recorded., Results: Intrahepatic recurrence rate of HAIC group and the control group was respectively 19.05% and 39.53%, P < 0.05. Disease-free survival rate was respectively 57.14% and 44.19%, P < 0.05. Overall survival rate was 66.67% and 46.51%, P < 0.05. All patients in HAIC group tolerated the therapy. No adverse effect above grade 3 was reported in HAIC group., Conclusion: HAIC effectively and safely prevents intrahepatic recurrence and improves the prognosis of patients with HCC after curative resection.

Background/aims: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on liver metastases from pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy., Methodology: We randomly assigned 106 patients with pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2010 to receive 2 cycles of HAIC plus 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (Combined Therapy) or 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy alone (Monotherapy). Both the HAIC and systemic chemotherapy regimen consisted of a 5-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 as an over 30-min infusion on day 1 and day 8. The treatment was started on an average of 21.2 days after surgery and repeated every 4 weeks. The disease-free survival, overall survival and liver metastases-free survival were compared., Results: There was no significant difference in adverse effects between two groups. Significant differences were found in 3-year overall survival (Combined Therapy, 23.08 %; Monotherapy, 14.81%; P=0.0473) and liver metastases-free survival (Combined Therapy, 80.77%; Monotherapy, 55.56%; P=0.0014)., Conclusions: HAIC effectively and safely prevents liver metastases and improves the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy.

Background/aims: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and costs between endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS)., Methodology: We randomly assigned 112 patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction 2006 and 2011 to receive EBS or PTBS with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) as palliative treatment. PTBS was successfully performed in 55 patients who formed the PTBS group (failed in 2 patients). EBS was successfully performed in 52 patients who formed the EBS group (failed in 3 patients). The effectiveness of biliary drainage, hospital stay, complications, cost, survival time and mortality were compared., Results: Patients in PTBS group had shorter hospital stay and lower initial and overall expense than the BBS group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in effectiveness of biliary drainage (P = 0.9357) or survival time between two groups (P = 0.6733). Early complications occurred in PTBS group was significantly lower than in EBS group (3/55 vs 11/52, P = 0.0343). Late complications in the EBS group did not differ significantly from PTBS group (7/55 vs 9/52, P = 0.6922). The survival curves in the two groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.5294). Conclusions: 3.

Background/aims: This study aims to identify the optimal mini-invasive treatment for extrahepatic bile duct stones., Methodology: One hundred and seventy eight patients with EHBD stones were randomized into 4 groups: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) plus T-tube drainage (group LT), LC and LCBDE with endonasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube (group LE), and endoscopic sphincterotomy with ENBD followed by LC (group EE) and T-tube drainage of open CBDE (group OT). Demographic data, perioperative findings, postoperative outcomes, hospital expense, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) scores and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were analyzed., Results: The operating time was longest in group EE. There was less bleeding in group OT and EE. Group LE and EE had shorter hospital stay and recovery time of intestinal motility. The postoperative white blood cell count and serum C-reaction protein level were higher in group LT and OT. Postoperatively, the mean GIQLI scores in group LE and EE were higher. Mean cost were highest in group EE. Patients in group LE had lowest cost per QALY., Conclusions: The modified laparoscopic procedure, LC combined with LCBDE followed by a primary closure over the ENBD tubes, appears to be the best option for patients with EHBD stones.

Background/aims: Despite the emphasis on its role, the spleen has commonly been removed in distal pancreatectomy. We designed this study to evaluate the efficacy of spleen salvage during distal pancreatectomy for patients with benign and borderline malignant tumors., Methodology: From January 2005 to July 2009, 82 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) and 78 patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP). Medical records were retrospectively reviewed., Results: The demographics and final diagnoses were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion and operative time between the two groups. More perioperative complications occurred in DPS group than in the SPDP group (p = 0.0344). Consequently, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in SPDP group than in DPS group (p = 0.0273). Platelet counts on postoperative day (POD) 5, hemoglobin on POD 3, WBC counts and CRP level on POD 2 were significantly higher in the DPS group than in the SPDP group and these differences continued to be significant for months after surgery., Conclusions: In addition to frequent higher-grade complications, prolonged hospital stays, DPS appeared to result in severer hematological abnormalities. Even an effort to preserve adult spleen in distal pancreatectomy is worthwhile.

Background/aims: Despite the emphasis on its role, the spleen has commonly been removed in distal pancreatectomy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of spleen salvage during distal pancreatectomy for patients with benign and borderline malignant tumors., Methodology: 82 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) and 78 patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP). Medical records were retrospectively reviewed., Results: There were no significant differences in demographics, final diagnoses estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion and operative time between the two groups. More perioperative complications occurred in DPS group than in the SPDP group (p = 0.0344). Consequently, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in SPDP group than in DPS group (p = 0.0273). On the follow-up survey, episodes of common cold or flu were apparently more frequent in the DPS group (p = 0.047). More patients in the DPS group felt fatigue (p = 0.0481) and poorer health condition (p = 0.0371). Less newly developed (p = 0.0193) and aggravated diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0361) were also observed in SPDP group., Conclusions: In addition to frequent higher-grade complications, and prolonged hospital stays, DPS appeared to result in poorer health condition based on follow-up survey. Even an effort to preserve adult spleen in distal pancreatectomy is worthwhile.

Background/aims: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and costs between percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and surgical bypass., Methodology: We randomly assigned 142 patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction between 2005 and 2010 to receive PTBS or surgical bypass as palliative treatment. PTBS was successfully performed in 70 patients who formed the PTBS group (failed in 7 patients). Sixty five patients underwent surgical bypass treatment. Additional gastrojejunostomy was performed in five patients. The effectiveness of biliary drainage, hospital stay, complications, cost, survival time and mortality were compared., Results: Patients in PTBS group had shorter hospital stay and lower initial and overall expense than the surgical group (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in effectiveness of biliary drainage (p=0.9307) or survival time between two groups (p=0.4826). Early complications of PTBS group was significantly lower than surgical group (3/75 vs. 11/65, p=0.0342). Late complication in PTBS group did not differ significantly from surgical group (9/70 vs. 6/65, p=0.6823). The survival curves in the two groups showed no significant difference (p=0.1032)., Conclusions: PTBD is a better palliative treatment than surgical bypass for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction for its high effectiveness of biliary drainage and acceptable expense and complication.

Background/aims: This study aims to investigate the influence of endostatin on angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)., Methodology: Ninety-five patients with HCC were enrolled. Twenty-six patients received initial liver resection without preoperative TACE (non-TACE), 24 received preoperative TACE without endostatin (TACE), 22 received endostatin (15mg/m2) right after TACE intravenously (TACE-V) and 23 received endostatin (15mg/m2) through the hepatic artery during TACE (TACE-A). TACE was performed using Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 (emulsified with lipiodol, 10-12mL), cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 500mg/m2 through the hepatic artery feeding the tumor. Patients received liver resection 4 weeks after second course of TACE., Results: The mean microvessel density (MVD) was 32.23±12.71, 57.46±18.38, 44.36±15.13 and 43.48±15.59 in non-TACE, TACE, TACE-V and TACE-A group respectively. The positive rate of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression was 46.15%, 91.67%, 77.27% and 73.91% in non-TACE, TACE, TACE-V and TACE-A groups, respectively. Compared to the non-TACE group, MVD and VEGF expression in TACE, TACE-V and TACE-A groups were significantly higher (p<0.05). MVD and VEGF expression in the TACE-V and TACE-A groups were significantly lower than in the TACE group (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Endostatin could significantly repress angiogenesis in HCC after TACE by down-regulating expression of VEGF.

Background/aims: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on liver metastases of Stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection., Methodology: We randomly assigned 287 Stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection between 2002 and 2008 to receive 2 cycles of HAIC plus 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (combined therapy) or 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy alone (monotherapy). Both the HAIC and systemic chemotherapy regimen consisted of a 2-hour infusion of Oxaliplatin (85mg/m2) on day 1 followed by folinic acid 200mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on days 2 and 3 and by 5-fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 as a 48-hour infusion on days 2 and 3. The treatment repeated every 4 weeks. The disease-free survival, overall survival and liver metastases-free survival were compared., Results: There was no significant difference in adverse effects between two groups. Significant differences were found in 3-year disease-free survival (Combined therapy, 75.00%; Monotherapy, 63.27%; p=0.0035), overall survival (Combined therapy, 84.29%; Monotherapy, 65.31%; p=0.0006) and liver metastases-free survival (Combined therapy, 80.00%; Monotherapy, 69.39%; p=0.0451)., Conclusions: HAIC effectively and safely prevents metachronous liver metastases and improves the prognosis of patients with Stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection.