Search

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis with the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI): Usefulness in patients with chronic liver disease," by Y. Yilmaz and colleagues in the 2011 issue.

Background: In chronic liver diseases, a correct estimation of the severity of liver fibrosis is important for recommendations regarding the treatment. Nowadays, evaluation of fibrosis is done by noninvasive methods such as biochemical scores and transient elastography instead of liver biopsy. The lack of sensitivity to detect fibrosis, because of its heterogeneity is a drawback of liver biopsy (LB). Objectives: To compare transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) for the evaluation of liver stiffness (LS), against percutaneous LB. Patients and Methods: Our study comprised of 223 subjects; 52 without fibrosis (38 volunteers and 14 patients with F0 on LB), 36 with F1, 40 with F2, 26 with F3 and 69 with liver cirrhosis (46 with LB and 23 with signs of cirrhosis). For each patient we performed in the same session 10 TE and 5 ARFI measurements. The median values were calculated. Results: A strong linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.870) was found between TE and fibrosis (P < 0.0001); there was also a weaker correlation between ARFI and fibrosis (Spearman rho = 0.646; P < 0.0001). TE measurements were also correlated with ARFI measurements (Spearman rho = 0.733, P < 0.0001). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE with a cut-off value of 7.1 kPa (AUROC 0.953). For ARFI, the cut-off value was 1.27 m/s--area under ROC curve (AUROC): 0.890, sensitivity (Se) of 88.7%, specificity (Sp) of 67.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (P = 0.0044). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4), the optimum cut-off values were 14.4 kPa for TE (AUROC: 0.985, Se: 95.6%, Sp: 94.7%, PPV: 89.2%, NPV: 98%) and 1.7 m/s for ARFI (AUROC: 0.931, Se: 93%, Sp: 86.7%, PPV: 73.6%, NPV: 96.9%) (P = 0.0102). Conclusions: LS evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic viral hepatitis can be evaluated using invasive or noninvasive methods. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate liver stiffness in inactive HBsAg carriers compared with normal subjects and determine if it is influenced by viral load in these patients. Patients and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 140 inactive HBsAg carriers and 152 normal subjects (without any signs or history of liver disease). In all subjects, liver stiffness was measured by 3 experienced physicians using a FibroScan® device (EchoSens, France) per standard procedures. We excluded patients for whom the SR of liver stiffness measurements was <60% and those who had measurements with an IQR>30%. Results: The mean liver stiffness in inactive HBsAg carriers was 5.6±2.1kPa, significantly higher than in normal subjects (4.8±1.2 kPa, p = 0.0002). In 16.4% (23) of inactive carriers, liver stiffness exceeded 7 kPa (the cutoff for significant fibrosis F > 2). In patients with undetectable viral loads, the mean liver stiffness was 4.9± 1.2 kPa, significantly lower than in those with detectable DNA (<2000 IU/ml)(6.7±2.7 kPa, p<0.001). Conclusions: Inactive HBsAg carriers have higher liver stiffness values compared with healthy individuals. Liver stiffness in inactive HBsAg carriers with detectable viral loads is higher than in those who are aviremic, suggesting that low viral loads promote fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: To compare several non-invasive methods of fibrosis assessment in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (platelet count, the APRI score, the Forns score, the Lok score, FIB-4, Transient Elastography [TE]), versus percutaneous liver biopsy (LB)., Methods: Our study included 150 patients with chronic HCV infection in which LB, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by means of TE and biological tests needed for calculating the scores (according to the classic formulas) were performed in the same session., Results: The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F = 2 Metavir) was LSM with AUROC-0.773, followed by APRI (AUROC-0.763), Forns (AUROC-0.744), platelet count (AUROC-0.732), Lok (AUROC-0.701) and FIB-4 (AUROC-0.669), but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For excluding cirrhosis, all the tests had excellent NPV (>97%). The best test for predicting cirrhosis was LSM (AUROC-0.979), significantly better than platelet count (AUROC- 0.899, P = 0.022) and than FIB-4 (AUROC-0.839, P = 0.042), otherwise the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). All of the non-invasive tests were statistically significantly correlated (P < 0.0001) to the severity of fibrosis: APRI r=0.570; Forns r=0.540; Lok r=0.4843; FIB-4 r=0.4171; platelet count r=-0.4842., Conclusions: LSM by means of TE seems to be more sensitive than APRI, Forns, Lok and FIB-4 scores and than platelet count for the prediction of significant fibrosis, but the differences are not statistically significant. The APRI score and Forns scores correctly identified most (71%) of the patients having, or not having, significant fibrosis. LSM was the best method for predicting cirrhosis, but all the evaluated tests had excellent predictive value (AUROCs 0.839-0.979).