Search

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend radiation therapy (RT) for localized indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL). Many referring physicians avoid RT to the head and neck (HN) due to fears of toxicity. Very low‐dose radiation (4 Gy) for select patients produces sustained local control and recently gained popularity. We compared early and late toxicities of standard 24–30 Gy to 4 Gy in patients with HN iNHL. We retrospectively analyzed 266 consecutive patients with HN iNHL receiving RT from 1994 to 2017. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and toxicities were collected from medical records. Early (≤2 months post‐RT) and late (>2 months post‐RT) toxicities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Grades 1–2 were defined as "low‐grade" and 3–4 "high‐grade." Toxicity incidence was compared between 4 and >4 Gy, grouped by treated site (orbit, nonorbital head, neck, skin) and early versus late. Median follow‐up was 23 months (2–145) and 68 months (2–256) for 4Gy and >4 Gy cohorts, respectively. Median dose for the >4 Gy cohort was 30 Gy (10.5–54 Gy). Early and late toxicity incidences were lower in the 4 Gy cohort compared to >4 Gy across all RT‐sites: early toxicity, orbit, 42% versus 96%; nonorbital head, 24% versus 96%; neck, 22% versus 94%; skin, 31% versus 87%; late toxicity, orbit, 20% versus 71%; nonorbital head, 6% versus 66%; neck, 6% versus 57%; skin, 0% versus 46% (4 Gy vs. >4 Gy, respectively). Toxicities among both cohorts were largely low‐grade. High‐grade early and late toxicities did not occur in the 4 Gy cohort. There was 1 high‐grade early toxicity (Grade 3 dry mouth) and 17 high‐grade late toxicities (Grade 3 cataracts) in the >4 Gy cohort. RT to HN for iNHL is associated with minimal short‐ and long‐term toxicity and excellent local control among 4 Gy and >4 Gy treatments. In this setting, "toxicity" concerns should not deter oncologists from potentially curative RT. In select patients where toxicity remains a concern, very low dose 4 Gy could be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last years several borderline B‐cell lymphoid proliferations have been recognized that lie at the interface between benign and malignant. These lesions can be divided in two groups; those considered precursor lesions of well recognized lymphoid malignancies and the group of indolent lymphomas with limited potential for progression. Precursor lesions are monoclonal and share many genetic features of their malignant counterpart. The first recognized precursor lesion was monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Thereafter, the widespread use of immunohistochemistry, fluorescence‐activated cell sorting analysis and molecular techniques in lymphoid samples led to the recognition of other precursor lesions such as monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis, in situ follicular neoplasia and in situ mantle cell neoplasia. The second group of disorders comprises monoclonal lymphoid proliferations with limited malignant potential without a counterpart among the currently recognized lymphoma entities; these include pediatric‐type follicular lymphoma, pediatric nodal marginal zone lymphoma, and duodenal‐type follicular lymphoma. Despite their clonal nature, a conservative treatment has been shown to be sufficient in most cases. The diagnostic criteria of precursor/indolent B‐cell proliferations, recent advances in the understanding of progression and lymphomagenesis and current recommendations for treatment will be discussed. In order to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful therapy, these lesions need to be recognized and diagnosed correctly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BCD-020 is a proposed rituximab biosimilar, which has shown high similarity to rituximab in quality and nonclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of BCD-020 and reference rituximab in adult (older than 18 years) patients with indolent lymphomas (follicular lymphoma grade 1-2, splenic marginal zone lymphoma, and nodal marginal zone lymphoma). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity were also studied. Patients with no previous biologic treatment for lymphoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BCD-020 or comparator 375 mg/m2 for 4 weeks. Primary study outcome was day 50 overall response rate defined as complete or partial remission. Equivalence range was -20% to 20% for 95% CI for overall response rates difference. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled, 89 in BCD-020 arm and 85 in comparator arm. The overall response rate was 44.71% in BCD-020 arm and 41.89% in comparator arm. Limits of 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference of overall response rates between arms were (-12.62%-18.24%) showing equivalent efficacy. Sixty-one (68.54%) and 59 (69.41%) patients had at least one adverse event in BCD-020 arm or comparator arm, respectively. No unexpected adverse reactions were reported. Antidrug antibodies with no neutralizing activity were detected in two patients in comparator arm on day 14 further declining below detection threshold. Rituximab concentrations had equivalent pattern after intravenous administration of both drugs. Both drugs caused depletion of B-cells without significant influence on other blood cell lineages. In this study, we showed equivalent efficacy of BCD-020 and reference rituximab when used in patients with CD20-positive indolent lymphomas. We also confirmed pharmacokinetic equivalence of BCD-020 and reference rituximab. Safety profile, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of BCD-020 were also comparable with those of reference rituximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

These are the final results of the Ofatumumab in MALT lymphoma study (O-MA 1), a pilot phase II trial evaluating the capacity and safety of ofatumumab to induce objective responses in patients with Helicobacter pylori eradication refractory or extragastric MALT lymphoma. Ofatumumab was given at 4 weekly doses (1000 mg) followed by 4 doses at 2-month intervals starting at week 8. According to protocol, a total of 16 patients were recruited (median age 69 years; range 38-85). Thirty one percent (5/16) of patients had primary gastric MALT lymphoma while the remaining 69% (11/16) presented with extragastric manifestations. Seventy-five percent (12/16) had localized lymphoma and 4 patients disseminated disease. The overall response rate to treatment with ofatumumab was 81% (13/16), with the median time to best response being 5.5 months. In detail, 50% (8/16) achieved complete remission; 31% (5/16), partial remission; and 19% (3/16), disease stabilization as best response. However, 1 patient with gastric lymphoma and complete remission at second restaging had a relapse at final assessment but ongoing complete remission during further follow-up. Tolerability was excellent accept low-grade infusion reactions occurring in 86% (14/16). At a median follow-up time of 25 months only 1 patient has relapsed suggesting durable responses in the majority of patients. This pilot trial shows clearly that ofatumumab is active and safe for the treatment of MALT lymphoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purine analogue 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine (2-CDA, cladribine) +/- rituximab has been successfully tested in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT lymphoma) patients. However, studies using cladribine in other indications have reported the potential for prolonged hematological side effects and secondary hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies. To date, there have been no data on long-term effects of cladribine in MALT lymphoma patients. We have analyzed a large number of 49 patients treated with cladribine at our institution 1997-2011. All patients were treated within clinical trials and had undergone a standardized follow-up protocol minimizing a potential bias in the detection of late sequels and relapses. After a median follow-up time of 61 months (interquartile range: 43-72) for 49 analyzed patients, 35 (71%) are alive, while 14 (29%) have died. In the entire collective, three cases (6%) of prolonged pancytopenia including manifest myelodysplastic syndrome in one patient (2%), three cases (6%) of secondary lymphoid malignancies, and five cases (10%) of non-hematologic cancers were documented. In terms of outcome, 42/49 (86%) patients responded to cladribine-containing treatment, and only 10/42 (24%) responding patients needed further treatment after a median time to progression of 14 months (interquartile range, 8-34). Currently, 25/35 (71%) patients being alive are in ongoing complete remission and 2/35 (6%) in ongoing stable disease, respectively. Eight patients (23%) are free of lymphoma after second-line therapy, with the median overall survival not having been reached. Our data suggest that cladribine might be safely applied in patients with MALT lymphoma, also in terms of long-term toxicities. These data also confirm the potential of cladribine to induce durable remissions. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]