Search

Background: Little is known about the very long term durability of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate very long term AF ablation outcomes., Methods: We followed 5200 patients undergoing 7145 ablation procedures. We evaluated outcomes after single and multiple ablation procedures for paroxysmal (PAF; 33.6%), persistent (PeAF; 56.4%), and long-standing (LsAF; 9.9%) AF. We compared 3 ablation eras by initial ablation catheter: early (101 patients) using solid big tip (SBT) catheters (October 2003 to December 2005), intermediate (2143 patients) using open irrigated tip (OIT) catheters (December 2005 to August 2016), and contemporary (2956 patients) using contact force (CF) catheters (March 2014 to December 2021)., Results: AF freedom at 5, 10, and 15 years was as follows: initial ablation: PAF 67.8%, 56.3%, 47.6%; PeAF 46.6%, 35.6%, 26.5%; and LsAF 30.4%, 18.0%, 3.4%; final ablation: PAF 80.3%, 72.6%, 62.5%; PeAF 60.1%, 50.2%, 42.5%; and LsAF 43.4%, 32.0%, 20.6%. For PAF and PeAF, CF ablation procedures were better than OIT ablation procedures (P < .0001) and both were better than SBT ablation procedures (P < .001). LsAF had no outcome improvement over the eras. The 8-year success rate after final ablation for CF, OIT, and SBT catheter eras was as follows: PAF 79.1%, 71.8%, 60.0%; PeAF 55.9%, 50.7%, 38.0%; and LsAF 42.7%, 36.2%, 31.8%. Highest AF recurrence was in the first 2 years, with a 2- to 15-year recurrence of 2%/yr. Success predictors after initial and final ablation procedures were younger age, smaller left atrium, shorter AF duration, male sex, less persistent AF, lower CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, fewer drugs failed, and more recent catheter era., Conclusion: After year 2, there is 2%/yr recurrence rate for all AF types. Ablation success is best in the CF catheter era, intermediate in the OIT era, and worst in the SBT era. Over the ablation eras, outcomes improved for PAF and PeAF but not for LsAF. We should follow patients indefinitely after ablation. We need an understanding of how to better ablate more persistent AF., (Copyright © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an important cause of sudden cardiac death in young people and athletes. To date, no treatment has proven to slow the progression of the disease. Preload reducing agents such as nitrates and diuretics have shown promising results in preventing training-induced development of ARVC in a murine model., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with preload reducing therapy in patients with ARVC and symptomatic right ventricular (RV) dysfunction., Methods: We performed retrospective chart review of prospectively collected registry data and included 20 patients with definite ARVC who had serial echocardiographic measurements and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Six of the 20 patients with RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) above median (>25 cm 2 ) and New York Heart Association functional class II-IV symptoms were successfully treated with long-term isosorbide dinitrate 5-40 mg tid (at maximum tolerated dose) and hydrochlorothiazide-spironolactone 25-25 mg daily. The main outcomes of interest were RVEDA, RV fractional area change (FAC), and RV outflow tract measurements. Generalized estimating equations with repeated measures were used to identify the association between preload reducing agents and echocardiographic structural progression., Results: Patients who received preload reducing agents (n = 6) were older and had larger RVs with lower FAC at baseline. However, treatment with preload reducing agents was associated with less RVEDA enlargement during mean 3.3 (range 1-6.7) years of treatment in multivariate analysis (% change in RVEDA associated with treatment -7.71; 95% confidence interval -13.29 to -2.13; P = .007)., Conclusion: Preload reducing agents show promising results in slowing RV enlargement in patients with ARVC and show possible disease-modifying potential., (Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)